Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Descartes Problem of the Cartesian Circle

Good Essays
413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Problem of the Cartesian Circle
Does Descartes solve the problem of the Cartesian Circle? Despite Arnauld’s objection being to distinguish “what we are actually perceiving clearly and what we recall having clearly perceived sometime earlier” (Pynn 2011) we will always rely on our clear and distinct views and or perceptions we had, have, or will have to be true. Agreeing with Descartes is the obvious position I am taking in this argument because the questioning towards his theory is relying on the fact that our current clear and distinct perceptions are true. Arnauld’s disagreement lies in a couple of ways. One being that the doubts brought up from the beginning stages of meditations apply to all the clear and distinct perceptions and not just the ones from the past and not being deceived when I perform a basic operation like adding or counting sides. Also, if this response is just to put up a fight against this theory, then what shall we do when we cannot perceive clearly any longer? Or even have distinctive thoughts? Does it replay in our head like that of a film or a recording? Philosophers abroad have sought out potential solutions on behalf of Descartes over the past year by almost “borrowing” various ideas he has mentioned throughout his writings, but one in particular seems very interesting for decent solution to this argument. His second set of answers or Replies to more objections Descartes brings up the topic of atheism and how they can know that three angles of a triangle are equal to two right angles (Pynn 2011). The nonbelief in God shows that God’s existence may be irrelevant and Descartes may have an issue. Descartes claims that an atheist can be clearly aware that the basics of geometry and the three angles of a triangle equaling two right angles. Therefore he states, “This awareness of his is not true knowledge since no act of awareness that can be rendered doubtful seems fit to be called knowledge.” (Pynn). He (Descartes) wants to be able to come up with a true distinction between two levels of knowledge and having a clear awareness of something or almost a true thought or true “knowledge”. I believe this problem could possibly be solved because the atheist can have the doubt, but not the last word in this argument unless he knows that God exists because he cannot be free from this doubt that he is being deceived that God is not present.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum112 Assignment 1:Essay

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This surprise is first revealed after three paragraphs of Descartes debating the truth of his own existence between the conscious awake times and the unconscious dream times and the relationship to things in nature. According to Descartes (1636), “In thinking it is necessary to exist” and “that all things which we very clearly and distinctly conceive are true.” It is at that point that his focus turns to describing the proof of existence of God as the creator of all imperfect things.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This meditation makes emphasis in analyzing the things that someone can really call knowledge and that if there is even a slight reason to question whether you are right or not you should then dump everything you deed based from those principles, and be left with only the foundations of the principle. Scientific knowledge is a good example for this meditation because according to Descartes: “Physics, astronomy, medicine, and other disciplines which depend on the study of composite things are doubtful”; while subjects like arithmetic “deal only with the most simple and general things contain something certain and indubitable” (Descartes pg 167). Science relies in facts, but most of these facts can be prove wrong for example: A theory is a widely and likeable explanation to an event, yet it only has the word “possible” because an event or discovery may happen, and could really question the reliability of the theory and if wrong, then scientist will have to start from zero again in order to solve the problem. Although this may sound unlikely to happen today, there had been theories such as the “flat/centric earth” that people believed to be true some hundreds of years ago, but were proven wrong by scientist later…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descarte would also agree with the statement, as in his ontological argument he sets out that God is a perfect being, a part of being perfect is existing, and therefore God must exist. Descarte also uses the idea of the triangle in his argument, he writes that even if we think of triangles having four sides, the truth will not change; the triangle will remain to have 3 sides. For Descarte the triangle is God, he believes that God is immutable and will not change even if humans think he does not exist. Descarte would argue…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Now that I have had a chance to review my original essay, I’ve determined that my arguments for Descartes’ logic being circular were unclear because I believed something different from what I believe now. Though this revision will still address the same concepts from the Meditations as my previous essay, I will argue instead that Descartes’ argument for the existence of God is not guilty of circular logic but merely has the illusion of such. Descartes’ belief system for the existence of God consists of claims that seem to presuppose one another in defending their conclusions of each other, but instead, each follow from the Cogito as first principles.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes vs. Aquinas

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I found Descartes’ way of thinking very interesting when compared to Aristotle. Descartes doubts the existence of God when he decides to start over and completely ignore his senses. He states in his third meditation, “…and I do not yet even know for sure whether there is a God at all…I must examine whether there is a God, and if there is, whether he can be a deceiver.” (25) Descartes makes a goal for himself to find out if there is a God and who he is. According to Aquinas we will never be able to understand who or what God is. We are finite and so we cannot understand the infinity of God. We can only know He is and always will be because He has instilled that bit of knowledge within us. So when Descartes says we cannot have the idea of finite without the idea of infinite, he claims we understand what God is. But I would disagree and take Aquinas’ side because what Descartes is understanding is not who God is entirely; it is an idea of what he is like. We as human beings, can contemplate God and try to understand what makes him, him. But since we are so limited in our knowledge, we will never comprehend our God. Later on page 32, Descartes starts to say it does not matter that he does not grasp the infinite only that he understands it. In line 47 he says he sees no reason that his knowledge cannot increase to infinity and use that infinite knowledge to understand all of the other perfections of God. This idea cannot ever happen because we humans have a beginning. God is the one who made us, but no one made God. His knowledge is truly infinite because he, himself has no beginning and no end. We on the other hand were born, will die, and though are spirits will join God in heaven, he can still choose to end our spirits existence. I began to agree with Descartes as he realizes that even if his knowledge increases more and more, it will never actually be infinite because it will never reach the point where it can no longer increase. (pg 32) I liked his quote. ” God,…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    SKEPTICISM

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes lived during a very skeptical period, at a time before science as we know it existed, and after a long period of relative stagnation in philosophical thought during the Church-dominated and Aristotle-influenced late Middle Ages. He had been impressed, in both his academic work and in his experience of the world at large, by the realization that there appeared to be no certain way of acquiring knowledge, and he saw his main task as the epistemological one of establishing what might be certain knowledge as a stepping stone towards the ultimate pursuit of truth. His more immediate aim in this was to put scientific enquiry in a position where it was no longer subject to attack by Skeptics, and he tried to do this by a kind of…

    • 839 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Meditation one, Descartes initially writes about a blanket of ignorance that he feels he’s been trapped under for his entire life up until this point. He says “I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true.” With this statement, Descartes decides to do a spring cleaning of sorts of all his beliefs that he has reason to doubt. He makes a point to mention though, that not all of his beliefs are false or able to be refuted.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the beginning of the third meditation, Descartes seeks to establish the existence of God using his initial concept of self awareness. Descartes argued that because he thought, then he lived. Thinking ability at this time was linked to being alive and thought that there must be a god who puts the thoughts in his mind. In his quest for indubitable truth, Descartes came up with the theory of ideas, which classified those things that he considered distinct and clear to be true. Descartes argued that the idea of god should be coming from within him since he cannot experience god himself directly or find any perfection in himself.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Study Guide

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The aim of Descartes’ first meditation is to first rid the mind of opinion and to only believe what is true. The second goal of his is to begin to put sciences on a firm foundation. He plans on achieving these goals by using a methodological doubt process in which he will see if he can discover a basis or corrosive agent that can bring all his beliefs into doubt. He believes that once a belief can be doubted, all…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes and Hume are two very famous philosophers who had very distinct and competing beliefs about God. Descartes was a rationalist and Hume was an empiricist, therefore both had different restrictions on our ability to have knowledge on God. Rationalist claim that our knowledge is gained independently of sense experience. Empiricists claim that sense experience is the source of all our concepts and knowledge. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes attempts to prove that there is knowledge that God exists.…

    • 1772 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Descartes’ argument for God’s existence involves a circular argument, the Cartesian circle, as he relies upon the principles of clarity and distinctness to argue for the existence of God, and then claims that God is the guarantor of his clear and distinct ideas. Descartes says that we are sure that what we clearly and distinctly perceive is true only because God exists. However, how can we be sure that God exists only because we clearly and distinctly perceive this. Before we can be sure that God exists, we need to be able to prove that whatever we perceive clearly and distinctly is true. The proof for clear and distinct perceptions does not hold. So, because we still do not have a solid reason to think that what we clearly and distinctly perceive outside of ourselves is true, we have no reason to trust our ability to reason about other things, such as God, which means we can prove without a shadow of a doubt that God is not a…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Beliefs

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As Descartes continued to ponder his beliefs he began to examine his beliefs about God and whether those could be trusted or not. He had to question whether or not his beliefs could be relied upon or if God was actually deceiving him or if God is even a real thing. However, Descartes concludes that God does in fact exist and “God has never owed me anything, so I should thank him for his great generosity to me, rather than feeling cheated because he did not give me everything” Descartes also comes to the realization that God understands everything there could possibly be to know. As he continues in his mediations, he also states that even though God knows everything and we do not, we should not blame him for our flawed beliefs and the many misconceptions…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays