Preview

Descartes Reflex Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
662 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes Reflex Act
Reflex acts were one of the first human reactions to being studied. Descartes was the first beginning a study model of reflex acts, this to be able to demonstrate that the body worked like any other machine. Another scientist in studying this phenomenon, Robert Whytt. He was a Scottish physicist and physicist. He inclined his research around action-reflex, differentiating voluntary and involuntary movements. Describing the pupil reflex to light (reflecting Whytt), he further proposed that the arches of the spinal cord were interconnected and interacted in the production of coordinated movement. It was the first to demonstrate using the technique of progressive extirpation, thus giving the idea of a central organ (nervous system), capable of …show more content…
This experiment also showed that the production of the reflex does not depend on the marrow as a whole since to produce it is
Preserving a small cord segment. The sensuous anima, which he called the sentient principle, would be found located in the brain and spinal cord. He further proposed that the arches were interconnected and that they interacted in the production of the coordinated movement. His ideas expounded them in On the Reflex Function of the Medulla Oblongata and the Medulla Spinalis, and On the True Spinal Marrow, and the eExcitomotor system of n erves.

It may be observed that even in the most rudimentary acts, reflexes, considered before as a mechanical response to excitation, are discovered by physiologists, an intrinsic purpose sufficient to indicate that in them the mental character begins with their specific character. The defensive positions, implicit in the reflexes that reveal an inner impulse. They are also discovered in other irreflexive and involuntary acts (contraction of physiognomy, blushing, etcetera), and acquire undeniable subsistence in the volunteers, where there already appears all the quality of mind that directs with conscience and freedom the inner impulses, according to type Ideal that in the representation conserves of the elements offered by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Throughout Meditation One in The Meditation of the First Philosophy, Descartes reflects on a number of falsehoods he has believed throughout his life. He does this to create a system in order to clarify whether they are true or false, so that he can build a basic structure from which future knowledge can be based. This approach is called Method of Doubt. Doubt is defined as a feeling of uncertainty. Descartes opens Mediation One by stating that if he wants to establish information that is firm and lasting in the sciences, he would have to begin from the earliest foundations from which his current knowledge has been built upon. He establishes that the task includes breaking down the components that make up his general knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phyl 1000

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Spinal reflexes don’t require input from brain – may be modulated by higher input from brain but integrated in spinal cord…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Descartes’ First Meditation, Descartes’ overall intention is to present the idea that our perceptions and sensations are flawed and should not be trusted entirely. His purpose is to create the greatest possible doubt of our senses. To convey this thought, Descartes has three main arguments in the First Meditation: The dream argument, the deceiving God argument, and the evil demon “or evil genius”. Descartes’ dream argument argues that there is no definite transition from a dream to reality, and since dreams are so close to reality, one can never really determine whether they are dreaming or not. To reinforce that argument, Descartes presents the deceiving God argument. He says that since God is all powerful, then he has the power to deceive us about reality or our dreams. But again, Descartes feels this argument is missing something, which is why he concludes with the evil genius argument. The evil genius argument’s purpose is to tie all these arguments together and strengthen Descartes’ entire argument. The evil genius argument goes like this: God is omnipotent and supremely good, which means God cannot be the one who deceives humans, rather, a separate entity -- an "evil genius, [who is] supremely powerful and clever, who has directed his entire effort at deceiving me" (Descartes 492). By deceiving, I mean tricking humans that their sensations and perceptions are real, when they are indeed not real. To overcome this evil genius, Descartes says he will regard all external things as “hoaxes of my dreams, with which he (the evil genius) lays snares for my credulity” (Descartes 492). In this analysis, I will further discuss Descartes’ arguments in the First Meditation, the purpose of the evil genius argument, how Descartes attempts to overcome the power of this great deceiver, and ultimately why his attempt is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his first meditation, Descartes embarks on a journey to ensure that all his beliefs are true. He deems that he must rid himself of all false knowledge in order to obtain any true knowledge. Descartes decides to doubt everything he has previously held to be true. He will rely on his reasoning ability to rebuild his own knowledge, beginning with things of which he is completely certain. He states, “But reason now persuades me that I should withhold my assent no less carefully from opinions that are not completely certain and indubitable than I would from those that are patently false,” (18). Descartes refuses to accept anything that is possible to doubt. His reason for doing so is because he truly believes that this is the only way to discover the possible existence of something that cannot be doubted.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes Meditation Iii

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the "Mediations of First Philosophy" Descartes tries to prove the existence of God in the third meditation. He does this by coming up with several premises that eventually add up to a solid argument. First, I will explain why Descartes ask the question, does god exist? And why does Descartes think he needs such and argument at this point in the text. Secondly, I will explain, in detail, the arguments that Descartes makes and how he comes to the conclusion that God does exist. Next, I will debate some of Descartes premises that make his argument an unsound one, including circular reasoning. Finally, I will see if his unsound argument has diminished and undermined his principal goals and the incorrigible foundation of knowledge.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the second meditation Descartes discusses analyzing a fresh piece of wax examining its physical attributes “... it still tastes of honey and has the scent of the flowers from which the honey was gathered; its colour, shape and size are plain to see; it is hard, cold and can be handled easily…” (Descartes). He then imagine it placed within a fire noticing all its physical attributes change the wax loses its fragrance, colour, and shape; it now has become soft, warm and cannot be easily handled. However, Descartes is still able to identify it as wax. Even though his sight would perceive the wax as a completely different substance if it completely liquified it could be mistaken for some type of oil or even water. The assumption would remain…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes' Firth Meditiation addresses the existence of God for a second time for the purpose of revealing additional information as to his attributes. Being an ontological argument, it sheds light upon aspects of God's being, and in doing so, we may gain a better idea of not only the fact that he exists, but also how he exists. What may become evident to the reader of Fifth Meditation, although ironically not being explicitly defined as such by Descartes, is that his ontological argument for the existence of God is largely a causal one. That is to say, the meditator's idea of God (as being infinite, creatively potent, etc.) unavoidably depends upon the meditator's own origination, or, in Aristotelian terms, his efficient cause. Descartes describes something much like the causal principle in the Third Meditation as being, "obvious by the natural light that the total cause of something must contain at least as much reality as does the effect."…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Descartes’ Second Meditation the key philosophical idea of “I think, therefore I am” is introduced and thus begins a new age in western philosophy. Some of the arguments Descartes provide in order to support his claims are that in order to doubt anything, you must be able to think and if you think, you exist. Descartes brings up the point that there may be no physical world, along with that thought comes the doubt of anything else being real, which again concludes that he is thinking which means he is real.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main premises Descartes’ uses to build his subjective proof of God’s existence in the third meditation which connects directly to the objective one in the fifth, is that he possesses a clear and distinct idea of an infinite substance which he, as a finite substance, could not have created himself, and which therefore must come from the infinite substance itself. This, of course, follows from the causality premise that states that effect, in this case, an idea of God, cannot have more reality that its cause, which, should the idea of God come from Descartes’ mind alone, would be that mind in particular. However, what makes this argument less than perfectly sound for me is that Descartes clearly understands clear and distinct ideas…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I applaud Descartes in actually establishing something (that is not nothing) in his second Meditation and think he is getting somewhere, however, I also feel that there remains a large hole in his logic and that he is perhaps not being quite as methodical and careful in the conclusions he draws from the cogito. The starting point is, of course, the projection of thought – the actual act of thinking and the way in which it defines and characterizes the human mind. To be as meticulous and scrupulous as Descartes himself (previously), how do we know that thoughts are, in fact, a projection of the human mind? How can it be known whether or not a thought is projected from who-knows-where and that it is the actual nature or essence of the mind to…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditation II

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    x. Your claim is not about the external world, but about what is inside your mind…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes: Meditations

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How does a person determine what is a clear and distinct idea? In other words, is there any way of knowing what is certain and what is not? The Meditations are generally considered the starting point of modern Western philosophy, and with good reason. In this one brief text, Descartes turns many of the old doctrines, created by Aristotle, upside down and frames many of the questions that are still being debated in philosophy today. Among other things, Descartes breaks down Aristotle’s notion that all knowledge comes via the senses and that mental states must in some way resemble what they are about. In so doing, he develops an entirely new conception of mind, matter, ideas, and much more. Rene Descartes explains that in order to even begin to grasp what the difference is between what is certain and what is not, one must first learn how not to rely on their senses and to use skepticism in order to develop one’s certainty of the world. In this essay, we will look into the claim that the senses are not to be completely trusted and only clear and distinct ideas are certain.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The temperaments are supposed to depend upon the constitution of particular systems of the body: the brain and nerves being predominantly active from constitutional causes, seem to produce the nervous temperament; the lungs, heart, and blood vessels being constitutionally predominant, to give rise to the sanguine; the muscular and fibrous systems to the bilious; and the glands and assimilating organs to the lymphatic” (Whye).…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes views in the Second Meditation is that he tries to clarify precisely what this “I” is, this “thing that he thinks.” He concludes that he is not only something that thinks, understands, and wills, but is also something that imagines and senses. Even though he thinks he may be dreaming or deceived by an evil demon, he’s still something that can imagine, hear, and see things. His sensory perceptions may not be truthful, but they are certainly a part of the same mind that thinks. He believes that the senses, as we have seen, cannot be trusted, and should be doubted. Similarly, he also states he cannot trust imagination. The imagination can come up with all sorts of things that are not real, so with it being said, it can’t be the guide…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cuando nos referimos a las teorías biológicas de la personalidad, debemos tener presente que son aquellas que se interesan por el estudio de la personalidad desde dos perspectivas.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays