Throughout Meditation One in The Meditation of the First Philosophy, Descartes reflects on a number of falsehoods he has believed throughout his life. He does this to create a system in order to clarify whether they are true or false, so that he can build a basic structure from which future knowledge can be based. This approach is called Method of Doubt. Doubt is defined as a feeling of uncertainty. Descartes opens Mediation One by stating that if he wants to establish information that is firm and lasting in the sciences, he would have to begin from the earliest foundations from which his current knowledge has been built upon. He establishes that the task includes breaking down the components that make up his general knowledge.…
If he had not reached the metaphysical certainty of the self, it is likely that he would not be able to find any metaphysical certainty at all, including that of God’s existence. From this, Descartes then moves on to go about proving the existence of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, infinite, omniscient God. Before discussing Descartes’s proof of God’s existence, it is important to first discuss ideas, substances, and their realities. According to Descartes, ideas are formed in the human mind in three ways. Ideas are either experienced or perceived in the world, they have been created or invented, or they have been derived from one’s own nature.…
The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…
The Meditator is alone, no trees, no people, no oceans, no mountains, no earth, no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”, Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God, people would have created themselves. If this were to be true, everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects to allow humans to think. This human ability to think allows them to exist. If nothing else were to exist and the Meditator was alone in the universe then he could not think and without thought,…
According to this principle, the reality of the cause must be greater than or equal to the reality of the effect. The idea of God has infinite reality and, by theory, the only cause of this infinite idea can only be God. With all this said, the reality of God is the only plausible cause to the reality of the idea of God. Descartes gives another proof in Meditation Five where he has reasoned that a triangle must have all the properties he assigns to it, because the triangle exists as an idea in his mind and he clearly and distinctly perceives all these properties. He then reasons, by analogy, that God exists as an idea in his mind and he clearly and distinctly perceives all of his qualities. One of these qualities is existence, so it follows from his clear and distinct perception that God must exist. If existence is the essence of God, then God would not be God if he did not exist, just as a triangle would not be a triangle if it were not three-sided. At the very least, then, the existence of God must be as certain as the properties of mathematical and geometrical objects since he can prove them in the same way. Having concluded that God must necessarily exist, Descartes goes further and then asks how he received the idea of God. He could have not invented the idea. Therefore, the idea must be innate which, according to Descartes, means that God must have created him…
Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…
"Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…
In Meditation one, Descartes initially writes about a blanket of ignorance that he feels he’s been trapped under for his entire life up until this point. He says “I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true.” With this statement, Descartes decides to do a spring cleaning of sorts of all his beliefs that he has reason to doubt. He makes a point to mention though, that not all of his beliefs are false or able to be refuted.…
Although the concept of finite existence should be preceded with some substance that is definitely infinite, this mere substance is not enough to explain the infiniteness because I am positively finite and to my understanding of God, and that he is independent, infinite, having both supreme power and intelligence. Therefore, this is a show that he cannot be able to have the ability of thinking the way he does, if it is not a fact that he is either an infinite being or an infinite being supports his thinking capacity. Although the explanation is logical, several flaws in thinking can be analyzed from the reading and understanding. I do agree with most of Descartes’ reasoning of the existence, that’s why I will not only give further clarification, but also explain Descartes biggest flaw in his argument.…
Firstly, Descartes in the third meditation sets out to prove that God does indeed exist. To begin with, he considered that the source of an idea must be as real as the idea itself. He thought that since his idea of God had overwhelmingly unlimited content, then the one who caused the idea must be infinite and that it must be god, and thus asserted that what is more perfect cannot arise from what is imperfect. In his conclusion, Descartes says that God is a substance that is omnipotent, omniscient, independent and infinite. He argued that if the objective reality of an idea could not come from him, then it could have come from something else. The basis for the arguments he put forward lies in the…
Descartes constructs an argument for God’s existence on page 32-34 of his third meditation titled: Concerning God and He Exists. In this paper, I will summarize Descartes’s argument in my own words.…
Descartes also states that this argument isn’t strong enough to prove that God exists. Because he has been constantly revising his believes he says that at this point he can easily tell the difference between essence and existence. After he points that out he explains that he believes that God could be separated from the existence but not from his essence. Then he contradicts himself saying that not existing would be prove of him not being perfect thus he had to exist. After that Descartes starts lacking of confidence that God exists. He thinks that he is giving some attributions, being perfect; to a creature that he doesn’t even know if exists. He thinks that he is just matching two things that he knows to make something new, something that…
René Descartes begins his first meditation by calling all our current beliefs to suspicion. His purpose of this practice was to stripe away all the falsehoods that we have acquired since childhood by the use of our senses. He also wanted to build anew a stable foundation of beliefs that he can be certain are of undeniably truths.…
However, Descartes’ argument for God’s existence involves a circular argument, the Cartesian circle, as he relies upon the principles of clarity and distinctness to argue for the existence of God, and then claims that God is the guarantor of his clear and distinct ideas. Descartes says that we are sure that what we clearly and distinctly perceive is true only because God exists. However, how can we be sure that God exists only because we clearly and distinctly perceive this. Before we can be sure that God exists, we need to be able to prove that whatever we perceive clearly and distinctly is true. The proof for clear and distinct perceptions does not hold. So, because we still do not have a solid reason to think that what we clearly and distinctly perceive outside of ourselves is true, we have no reason to trust our ability to reason about other things, such as God, which means we can prove without a shadow of a doubt that God is not a…
He starts with the idea of a God who is eternal, infinite, and perfect. In the beginning of Meditations on First Philosophy, He explains that “we must believe that there is a God, because we are so taught in the Holy Scriptures, and, on the other hand, that we must believe the Holy Scriptures because they come from God “(Descartes 1). He then doubts himself if god does really exist. Through examining his thoughts, he ends up believing that the idea of God exists because of his innate idea of God which has to be God who “is the cause of this idea”(Descartes 25). Descartes then explains more in depth saying, “I have no choice but to conclude that the mere fact of my existing is and of there being in me an idea of a most perfect being, that is God, demonstrates most evidently that God too exists” (34). Another reason is how in his further mediations, he explains how if God does not exist, then he is not a supremely perfect being. Saying that God does not exist, we can imagine a being that is more perfect than God. But this is a contradiction because since the idea of God is the idea of the most perfect being of all. Therefore, God must exist because you cannot image a more perfect being than god, who he is the almighty and perfect of…