Preview

Describe The Time Period Between The Fall Of Roman Empire And The Beginning Of The Middle Ages?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
757 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe The Time Period Between The Fall Of Roman Empire And The Beginning Of The Middle Ages?
1. Define: Middle Ages, medieval
Middle Ages: used to describe the time period between the fall of the Roman empire and the beginning of the Renaissance
Medieval: related to the Middle Ages
2. Identify: Clovis, Merovingians, Charles Martel, Pepin the Short, Charlemagne, Louis the Pious, Magyars, Vikings
Clovis: a military leader, who became king of one of the Frankish tribes
Merovingians: successors of Clovis, including Clovis himself
Charles Martel: successor of Pepin as the mayor of the palace
Pepin the Short: the son of Charles Martel, and the ‘king by the grace of God’
Charlemagne: the son of Pepin the Short, known as one of history’s outstanding rulers
Louis the Pious: the son of Charlemagne who ruled after Charlemagne’s death
Magyars:
…show more content…
Summarizing Ideas:
What were the accomplishments of Clovis? - Clovis excelled as a military leader by conquering Frankish tribes and soon all of northern Gaul. He also became a strong supporter of Christianity, which united the kingdom and the church.
What were the accomplishments of Charles Martel? - Charles Martel defeated the Moors near Tours, in central France, which stopped the Muslim expansion in western Europe and other raids that were present at the time.
What were the accomplishments of Charlemagne? - Charlemagne unified the empire during his lifetime, defeated the Lombards in Italy, the Saxons in northern Germany, and the Avars in central Europe.
5. Evaluating Ideas: Why did Charlemagne’s empire disintegrate? What actions might his successors have taken to hold the empire together?
Charlemagne’s empire disintegrated, because his descendants were poor rulers who fought among themselves instead of uniting against powerful and ambitious local lords. His successors could have agreed with each other with strategies and ideas to maintain the empire as it was when Charlemagne
…show more content…
Classifying Ideas: List three aspects of the feudalism system and three aspects of the manorial system. Then show how the two systems worked together.
The three aspects of the feudalism system are only nobles could be vassals, the same man could be both vassal and lord, and each man’s loyalties and obligations were owed only to the lord immediately above him or to the vassal immediately below him.
The three aspects of the manorial system are the lord and several peasants shared the land of the manor, each manor tried to be self-sufficient, and the lord owns ⅓ of the field while the peasants receive and work the other ⅔ of the field.
These systems worked together in which feudalism is the political structure of Europe while the manorial system is the economical structure of Europe. They both work together to form social stability among the society and produce goods.
3. Comparing Ideas: How did the life of the medieval peasant compare with the life of the medieval lord or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When Charlemagne was still alive, he crowned his son, Louis the Pious, which is also the king of Aquitaine as a backup emperor just in case something happened to Charlemagne. Sadly, Charlemagne died of Pleurisy in Eight hundred and fourteen. He’s Son the empire together for another Four decades after the death of his father. Charlemagne was buried in Aachen, which that city is name after him in French and his body buried underneath a catholic…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alfred The Great Dbq

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Well for starters, Charlemagne did bring a whole lot to the table. The only significant thing I got out of him was the fact that he split his empire into “countries”, with a total of 300 counts watching those territories.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years 400-600, the kingdom border changed by cause of these wars. During this chaotic turbulence, the church stood by Rome and helped them get through the war by providing safety and strength. A Germanic tribe named the Franks took over the entire Germanic tribes, led by a strong leader by the name of Clovis. The Franks controlled a big part of Europe. Charles Martel, the mayor of the palace, expanded regions in the north, south, and eastern parts, thereby defeating the Muslims.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne’s Carolingian Renaissance most important consequences was the encouragement to spread of uniform culture as well as uniform religious practices. Construction of a Christian republic was Charlemagne’s vision. Despite the fact that Charlemagne unified his handwriting, standardized coins, elevated education, empire, and even scholarly Latin. Following his death in the year 814 his Empire declined in strength within a generation or two. His rule was so brilliant, such a hard act to follow. Many emperors who followed him seemed inferior. We've seen this before with Mohammed, Alexander the Great, Justinian, Constantine, and Augustus…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcuin and Charlemagne

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only was Charlemagne good at conquering land but he also did very well at governing the land he conquered. He was a clever ruler and knew he had to keep the nobles in his service. To do this he granted part of the royal lands as lifetime holdings to nobles who assisted him. Charlemagne also knew that he could not let the counts gain more power then him. To hold more control over his kingdom, Charlemagne required counts to serve outside their own family lands. He also sent out…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When Charlemagne’s father Pippin died, he inherited the Frankish Empire. The Empire was already powerful and Charlemagne made it even more powerful. He had governors throughout his Kingdom to help control the people and lands. Charlemagne sent out other men to check up on them to make sure they were doing a good job. Having governors helped make his kingdom larger and more powerful. He conquered France,…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Maple/ McBride HONR- 1114 12-09-99 By the Cross and the Sword : Charlemagne's Impact on the West. "He who ordains the fate of kingdoms in the march of the centuries, the all-powerful Disposer of events, having destroyed one extraordinary image, that of the Romans, which had, it was true, feet of iron, or even feet of clay, then raised up, among the Franks, the golden head of a second image, equally remarkable, in the person of the illustrious Charlemagne. Notker the Stammerer, the monk of St. Gall, wrote these words in AD 844 to describe the reign of the most influential Frankish king Charlemagne ( Lectures 1). Charlemagne, son of Pepin the Short, ruled the Franks for 47 years (Koeller 1). The Carolingian Dynasty, of which Charlemagne was a member, was established in AD 751 when Pepin dethroned the last Merovingian king. The Carolingians ruled a land that "spoke several different tongues, had different cultural and historical traditions, and different institutions."(Nelson 2). The great variation found in the people of the Frankish kingdom produced for Charlemagne great obstacles. Dr. Skip Knox, Professor at Boise State University argues that the "monarchy among the Franks was not equipped to deal with this situation…" (Knox 11). Attempting to establish control in his empire, Charlemagne implemented a series of programs that would produce a new form of government and would engage his court in an intellectual renaissance. Charlemagne was forced to entirely reinvent the Merovingian system of government, and to do so he "either created new offices, or adapted old ones to new purposes…" (Knox 11). He appointed dukes and counts, and appointed in the German regions of the land margraves, an office that would remain long after the time of Charlemagne. Thus, Charlemagne created a political hierarchy in which the counts would report to the dukes, and the dukes to Charlemagne himself. Charlemagne gained the loyalty and respect of his barons by…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charlemagne was born in 742 at Aachen, the son of Pepin(or Pippin) the Short and…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne’s reform of the church was key to the governance of his empire. The local priests and clergy were ineffective in their service to the people, and became apathetic towards their communities (Text Pg. 233). To this effect, Charlemagne and his son, reformed the churches and parishes so that they best served the people, and the King. Competent staff were placed in positions of influence so as to increase the effectiveness of the church (Text Pg. 235).…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Charlemagne expanded the boundaries of the Frankish kingdom with resolute and strategic military action including large victories in Saxon and Rome. His unyielding tactics secured his victory in the Saxon War which carried on for over 30 years. In this conquest, King Charlemagne aimed to conjoin the Germanic tribes of Saxon and Frank by forcibly spreading the influence of Christianity. Christendom was the foundation that united his kingdom. He was revered by the leaders of nations outside his land because he was both affable and unrelenting. Charlemagne gained…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne was way ahead of his time in many aspects. Though granting the church complete independence he watched over their actions like a vulture flying over fresh death . Promoting social stability and implementing hierarchical order in addition with being seen through spectacles of reverence, this was a huge advantage to himself using the church as a backbone to lay his own foundation. Charlemagne holds a unique position in the history of the Christian church. If he had not stood on his bloodthirsty ways of brutal conversion would the Christian church be what it is today? It brings rise to the possibility of a entire religion being executed just how his many victims who denied conversion to Christianity were. In a different aspect Charlemagne reformation of education…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the fall of Rome a man named Charlemagne tried to build back the empire. At the end of his life raids of people Scandinavia called Vikings started to come in and raid. This made the holy roman empire think of new ways to defend and try to keep the vikings out. These hit and run raids helped shift power to nobles and away from kings.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During his reign, Charlemagne was often crusading to extend his empire. He gained support early in his career by granting land to lords, thereby securing their loyalty. He built a huge, fearsome army and led the men into many victories.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A quality of a good leader is to be able to improve your empire and also be able to sustain it. Charlemagne noticed how the Franks were not as educated as other civilizations, so he set up a school in his palace, with the help of Alcuin, the greatest scholar in Europe. His students learned Latin, music, maths, and literature. When improving infrastructure, he made many things like Rome, he built forums, baths, theatres, and aqueducts. He also modeled his capital city, Aachen, on Rome. He converted his people to Christianity by adding many churches throughout the empire, but he also converted people with force, by “shortening them by a head”[1], which was really just beheading someone; it is with this method that he converted many people he…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudalism is a popular theme in the 9th through 12th century. It refers to a social system that was key feature in medieval Europe (Medieval Europe: Feudalism) and is also “unsuitable in describing an extraordinarily complex situation” (Medieval Europe: Feudalism). The concept of feudalism adapted the longer it stayed around is why most historians do not approve of the standard concept of just a social system. The origin of feudalism stems from the “basic idea common to any society with a warrior caste” for example in Sparta, where all free men are warriors, the support came directly from the slaved peasants of Messenia, referred as the helots. (History of Feudalism). The complication to fully define feudalism comes from the development of…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays