Preview

description and evaluation of strategies used in social encounters

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
description and evaluation of strategies used in social encounters
2.2
Theories of attribution bias

Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Heider (1958) was the first to propose a psychological theory of attribution, but Weiner and colleagues (e.g., Jones et al, 1972; Weiner, 1974, 1986) developed a theoretical framework that has become a major research paradigm of social psychology

Fundamental attribution error
The fundamental attribution error focuses generally on how people explain how and why things happen in a social setting. There is a strong tendency for people to explain their own behavior as a function of external situations, but attribute the behavior of others to internal factors.
The fundamental attribution error explains why people often blame other people for things over which they usually have no control. The term blaming the victim is often used by social psychologists to describe a phenomenon in which people blame innocent victims of crimes for their misfortune.
The actor-observer bias tends to be more pronounced in situations where the outcomes are negative.For example, someone might say they did poorly on an exam because it was very difficult or unfair. But when explaining another's behavior, they would be more likely to attribute something internal, like not studying enough.

Actor observer effect
The actor-observer bias is a term in social psychology that refers to a tendency to attribute one's own actions to external causes, while attributing other people's behaviors to internal causes. Essentially, people tend to make different attributions depending upon whether they are the actor or the observer in a situation.

3.1 Self-monitoring in social encounters- Snyder 87-95

3.1 self-disclosure in social encounters- wiemann & Giles/Jourard71

3.1 self-presentation in social encounters- duck 88 influence people in positive way

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    ATTRIBUTION OF BLAME: A process whereby victims are faulted for bringing maltreatment on themselves, or extraordinary circumstances are invoked as justification for questionable conduct. (p. 112)…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social psychologists interested in social perception and cognition have an ‘intuitive scientist’ model of how people understand their worlds – people seek ‘truths’ in a logical and rational way (as cited in Buchanan et al, 2007, p.106). They suggest that in order for people to have a sense of control over their social interactions, they make inferences and assumptions about people’s behaviour and events that they encounter. This concept falls under the ‘attribution theory’ umbrella, which means; assigning cause to our own or other peoples behaviour. Fritz Heider (cited in Buchanan et al, 2007) was the first to propose a psychological theory of attribution. Heider discussed what he called “naïve” or “commonsense” psychology. In his view, people were like amateur scientists, trying to understand other people’s behaviour by piecing together information until they arrived at a reasonable explanation or cause. However, there is also evidence that suggests that this is not the case and that people do not always behave in ‘rational’ or ‘objective’ ways as expected. This essay therefore aims to evaluate both sides of the argument whilst concluding whether the ‘lay scientist’ view is realistic or not.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Psych Study Guide

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Describe the difference between personal and situational attributions in explaining behavior. What is the Fundamental Attribution Error, and how is it related to these types of attributions?…

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4.|The tendency for observers to underestimate the impact of the situation and to overestimate the impact of personal dispositions upon another's behavior is called:|…

    • 6548 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Serving Bias

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How would you explain the similarities and differences between fundamental attribution error and self-serving bias to someone who was not familiar with the two concepts?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fundamental attribution error is when a person overestimates the influence of another person’s personality over a remark or behavior rather than giving credit to the influence the situation may have on the person. A famous experiment demonstrating this “error” was conducted by David Napolitan and George Goethals. In this experiment, they instructed a woman to act either rude and critical, or warm and friendly to each person individually. Half of the group was told that the woman would be acting spontaneously, and the other half was let in on the experiment. The result was that the assumptions about her personality did not change even though half the group had known that she was an actor. Each group assumed that because the woman behaved coldly, her personality was so. Even the group who was told that her behavior was situational had still believed that she was warm and friendly because of the way she was acting in the situation.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    14. Fundamental attribution error: a bias toward overattributing the behavior of others to internal causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fundamental attribution error plays a role in this because, the error is made by people in which they attribute someone else 's behavior more to their personality and characteristic then to the situation in which they have been placed. In reality, someone 's behavior is actually more likely to be caused by the environment and situation that they have been placed in as opposed to their…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cognitive Dissonance Paper

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attribution theory attempts to explain how we attach meaning to either our behavior or other people’s behavior. As explained by Malle (2011), the attribution theory examines how the social observer uses certain tiding to arrive at contributory clarifications for certain events. Attribution theory, therefore, is keen on examining how information is gathered and shared to shape a causal ruling. The first proponent of this theory, Heider believed that individuals are naïve psychologists who try to make sense out of the world around them. This theory was later taken up by various…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, researchers are more focused on “how people develop their own ideas about other people, that is attribution theory, and the ways these ideas are organized, that is called personal construct theory (Hartley113). The attribution theory, is set to explain how we perceive each other. Once we are able to master the attribution theory, we are able to understand why we perceive each other the way we do; this allows us to analyze what we will say and how we will say something in the future ahead of us, such as in perception checking. Attribution theory determines “how people decide the cause of other people’s actions and vice versa” (Hartley 116). When faced with hard times, it is important that we come to understand that “our perception of other people is inextricably bound up with our perception of the situation that we believe they are in” (Hartley…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals whom possess an unambiguous perception are extremely likely to foster this bias of fundamental attribution error. For instance, one’s early assumptions of a quiet person he or she met at a family festivity may emulate an unfavorable first impression. In fact, others in attendance may ostracize the individual based on his or her behavior. However, in this case, the person was informed of a family tragedy prior to arriving at the event. Naturally, an event of such magnitude would alter a person's behavior in a social setting. After examining the situation, one may conclude a different perspective of the individual’s behavior; hence a non-descriptive trait. In addition to obedience in authority and fundamental attribution error, a self-serving bias is also a factor, which shapes an individual’s personal…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the biases commonly seen in attribution, including the fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer effect. List the factors that may account for these biases.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays