265
Design and Development of a Medical Parallel Robot for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Yangmin Li, Senior Member, IEEE, and Qingsong Xu
Abstract—The concept of a medical parallel robot applicable to chest compression in the process of cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR) is proposed in this paper. According to the requirement of
CPR action, a three-prismatic-universal-universal (3-PUU) translational parallel manipulator (TPM) is designed and developed for such applications, and a detailed analysis has been performed for the 3-PUU TPM involving the issues of kinematics, dynamics, and control. In view of the physical constraints imposed by mechanical joints, both the robot-reachable workspace and the maximum inscribed cylinder-usable workspace are determined. Moreover, the singularity analysis is carried out via the screw theory, and the robot architecture is optimized to obtain a large well-conditioning usable workspace. Based on the principle of virtual work with a simplifying hypothesis adopted, the dynamic model is established, and dynamic control utilizing computed torque method is implemented. At last, the experimental results made for the prototype illustrate the performance of the control algorithm well. This research will lay a good foundation for the development of a medical robot to assist in CPR operation.
Index Terms—Control, design theory, dynamics, medical robots, parallel manipulators.
I. INTRODUCTION
N the case of a patient being in cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) must be applied in both rescue breathing (mouth-to-mouth resuscitation) and chest compressions. Generally, the compression frequency for an adult is at the rate of about 100 times per minute with the depth of
4–5 cm using two hands, and the CPR is usually performed with the compression-to-ventilation ratio of 15 compressions to two breaths,1 so as to maintain oxygenated
References: Biomed. Eng., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 211–217, Feb. 1990. L. W. Tsai, Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators. New York: Wiley, 1999. J.-P. Merlet, Parallel Robots. London, U.K.: Kluwer, 2000. vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 799–810, 2002. 732, 2003. R. Di Gregorio, “A new family of spherical parallel manipulators,” Robotica, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 353–358, 2002. Theory, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 475–494, 2005. Oct. 2003. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., San Francisco, CA, 2000, pp. 1384–1389. Japan, 2003, pp. 908–913. Symp. Ind. Robots, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1988, pp. 91–100. Minneapolis, MN, 1996, pp. 3446–3451. machines,” Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 615–624, 2004. J. Lenarcic and M. L. Husty, Eds. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 49– 58. vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 59–72, 2006. C. Gosselin, “Determination of the workspace of 6-DOF parallel manipulators,” ASME J. Mech. Des., vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 331–336, 1990. Mech. Des., vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 259–264, 2002. J. Lenarcic and F. Thomas, Eds. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 2002, pp. 165– 174. Washington, DC, 2002, pp. 496–502.