2/25/15
NT2640
Unit 9 Labs
Detailed Lab Step Answers: 25 answers
Step 6.
Full duplex 100Mb/s
Step 10. show interfaces status
Detailed Lab Step Answers:
Step 5.
0200.0000.AAAA Fa0/11 0200.0000.BBBB Gi0/1 0200.0000.1111 GI0/2 0200.000.2222 Gi0/1
Step 9.
0200.0000.2222 Fa0/12 0200.0000.1111 Gi0/1 0200.0000.AAA Gi0/1 0200.0000.BBBB Gi0/1
No Detailed Lab Step Answers:
Detailed Lab Step Answers:
Step 5.
no conformation message
Step 9.
VLAN_TWO Fa0/2
Step 10. five periods
Detailed Lab Step Answers:
Step 2. yes Step 5. three are connected to VLAN1. All IP's are on the same subnet. It is important because …show more content…
A new version has already been designed to support future IPv6 networks.
Conventional subnet masking replaces the two-level IP addressing scheme with a more flexible three-level method; it lets network administrators assign IP addresses to hosts based on how they are connected in physical networks, subnetting is a real breakthrough for those maintaining large IP networks. It has its own weaknesses though, and still has room for improvement. The main weakness of conventional subnetting is in fact that the subnet ID represents only one additional hierarchical level in how IP addresses are interpreted and used for routing.
The Problem with Single-Level Subnetting
It may seem greedy to look at subnetting and say, only one additional level? However, in large networks, the need to divide the entire network into only one level of subnetworks doesn't represent the best use of our IP address block. Furthermore, we have already seen that since the subnet ID is the same length throughout the network, we can have problems if we have subnetworks with very different numbers of hosts on them, the subnet ID must be chosen based on whichever subnet has the greatest number of hosts, even if most of subnets have far fewer. This is inefficient even in small networks, and can result in the need to use extra addressing blocks while wasting many of the addresses in each …show more content…
It is first divided into two subnets; one subnet is divided into two sub-subnets; and one sub-subnet is divided into four sub-sub-subnets. The resulting six subnets are shown with thick black borders, and have a maximum capacity of 126, 62, 14, 14, 14, and 14 hosts.
VLSM greatly improves both the flexibility and the efficiency of subnetting. In order to use it, routers that support VLSM-capable routing protocols must be employed. VLSM also requires more care in how routing tables are constructed to ensure that there is no ambiguity in how to interpret an address in the network.
As it has been said before, VLSM is similar in concept to the way classless addressing and routing (CIDR) is performed. The difference between VLSM and CIDR is primarily one of focus. VLSM deals with subnets of a single network in a private organization. CIDR takes the concept we just saw in VLSM to the Internet as a whole, by changing how organizational networks are allocated by replacing the single-level “classful” hierarchy with a multiple-layer hierarchy.
The best way you can learn how to subnet a subnet (VLSM) is with examples. Let’s look at the diagram