Preview

Deterioration of Education with “No Child Left Behind”

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deterioration of Education with “No Child Left Behind”
Running head: Deterioration of Education

Deterioration of Education with “No Child Left Behind”
Diane Congleton
Kaplan University
CM220-13
Professor Dorothy Hoerr, M.A.
January 17, 2009

“No Child Left Behind”: Educating the Children On January 8th, 2002, the no child left behind (NCLB) act was signed into law. The NCLB was pushed through, by the Bush Administration, to help all children make it through school no matter what. The "No Child Left Behind," law assumes that all children learn at the same pace and in the same way. Does this help the children it was meant to or are we just hurting them? We should be listening to what the teachers say about this act, for they are the individuals that can see first hand the effects this act has had on our children. Changes must be made for the sake of the children and their futures.

When the NCLB first came about the intentions were great. According to the United Stated Department of education the NCLB was to be “based on stronger accountability for results, more freedom for states and communities, proven education methods, and more choices for parents” (2004). As a result of the NCLB every student enrolled in a public school is required to take an annual standardized test from third through eighth grade, and once in high school. Students are then broken up in to specific groups, such as "African-American" and "economically disadvantaged." As researched on the NEA (National Education Association) website, each group (including special education students) now must have a passing rate of 95 percent and by 2014 that percentage should increase to 100 percent. NCLB therefore, forces the teachers to lower and/or alter their primary educational goals by enforcing standardized tests which must be reported to measure their AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress). If schools do not meet the requirements, then the school is put on the "needs improvement" list and the district gives students the option of transferring to a



References: Beaver, William (2004).Can "no child left behind" work?. American Secondary Education. 32, 3-18. Lehrer, J. (2007). Effectiveness of No Child Left Behind Debated [Electronic Version]. Online NewsHour. Retrieved November 24, 2007 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/jan-june07/nclb_04-03.html NEA: No Child Left Behind - ESEA - NEA Position. Retrieved December 01, 2008, from NEA: National Education Association http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html No Child Left Behind. (2007). Retrieved December 1,2008, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=ln U.S. Department of Education:No Child Left Behind. (n.d.) Retrieved December 15, 2008, http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=pb

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Darling- Hammond, Linda. "Evaluating 'No Child Left Behind ' | The Nation." The Nation 21 May 2007: 1-5. CQ Researcher. Web. 12 Mar. 2013.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nclb Act Pros And Cons

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On January 8, 2002, former president George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act, which attempted to improve school’s test scores and accountability. The Act set out to improve education. With the decline in test scores and the racial discrimination in schools, it was time for a change. The change came through the NCLB Act when it tried to fix the issues in schools and make a positive impact for the children. Even though under the NCLB Act some goals were met, overall, the act was not effective in teaching other subjects other than the subjects required, instilling character in our students, and maintaining the consistency of the standards for passing.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 3 Comm2

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Schoof, R. (2013, Jul 20). NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT. The Charleston Gazette. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1406518586?accountid=458…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the No Child Left Behind act was passed, schools were given a set of standards that were required to be followed when hiring a teacher in order to find the best possible educators for the schools. Now, having more qualified teachers for schools sounds like it would have an immensely positive effect on the education system however, the NCLB act set these standards extremely high which made it very difficult for schools to find teachers who met those requirements.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law in January, 2002 by President George W. Bush. On the surface, because of bipartisan support, the act brought about, for the first time, surveillance measures to ensure that all school-aged children would receive a free, quality, public education. When researched historically we see the pattern that has emerged through policy and politics that has brought about NCLB. As a result of the acceptance of NCLB, we have created a way of viewing success in education by standardized testing, a monster in and of itself in it’s cost and ability to quantify the successful components of a good liberal education. It is necessary to understand how the Act came about, how it is being implemented, and the problems that have ensued to gain a good perspective about the philosophy and policies of the NCLB.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq No Child Left Behind

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They would try to accomplish this by having annual testing in subjects such as math, and reading to see their progress over the course of the school year, and schools would face severe penalties for schools that did not meet the goal that they had set for themselves (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). By having a set of standards that the schools had to keep and having a penalty for schools that did not meet their goal, it sets a parameter that should put a focus on the quality of the education of the child, to make sure they are receiving a quality education. Going back to the penalty section of the policy, this was a good thing to have, when writing the policy. By having a penalty you out a consequence for the schools for not providing a good quality education to the students. If a school did not meet its target goal on their progress reports, students could have the option to change schools if they wished, leadership of the schools could change, or the schools could close down entirely (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). This is important to know because it showed how seriously people were taking about the…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Essay

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and close achievement gaps. Passed with overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress, the law was signed by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. Clearly, our children are our future, and as President Bush has expressed. This law allows schools to receive reports cards instead of students.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    NCLB continued to increase the role of the federal government in states, but increased standardized testing standards which required schools to be at 100% proficiency level and diminished the focus of additional subject matter, such as foreign language and history. It allowed the federal government the provision to categorize school’s improvement within five years, as well as punish schools who fail to reach the proficiency levels by forcing these schools to restructure, give management power away, or give up and shut…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nclb Argument

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Ravitch, Diane. "Time to Kill 'No Child Left Behind '." Education Digest 75.1 (2009): 4.…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    5. Potter, Thomas, Joseph C. Wegwert, Catherine Haerr. No Child Left Behind and the Illusion of Reform. University Press of America 2006.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first reason that the schools are failing is because the bar that the NCLB sets has been set too high, and that the NCLB is failing. The NCLB itself is failing. The No Child Left behind Act, which was implemented by President Bush, is failing. Many educators would agree that the goals that the act sets, “every student in the country is supposed to be performing at grade level in math and reading by 2014”(Mandell 1), are impossible and that the standards are not fair, not accurate, and unrealistic. According to a survey, 48% of schools in the nation are not making “adequate yearly progress” (Mandell 1). This means that the No Child Left Behind Act is failing in 48 percent of the United States, so the act is clearly not effective and needs to be revised so that it has more obtainable goals. Furthermore, the standards were doubled by the NCLB. States are required to have reading and math tests once a year for 3rd to 8th graders and in 10th, 11th, or 12th grade students must take the test once, according to the NCLB. This new rule changes the number of tests from 3 to 7 (Popham 15-16). This rule is unfair because it more than doubles the standard that was previously in affect; this should have been a slow tradition and not have been all at once. Finally, even college professors know that the NCLB is failing. According to Arne…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 1081 Words
    • 31 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act focuses on standardized testing in all American schools. It is the Bush administration's sweeping educational reform, aimed at improving the performance of the nation's public schools by introducing accountability. Supporters of the act claim that it will increase the performance of all school children by raising the standards and allowing parents greater freedom in choosing the school they want their child to attend. The act also puts in place a system of punishment for schools if their student body does not perform to the standards set down by the National government (NCLB act). As well as increasing standards, this act also encourages teachers to use a curriculum that the government developed with "scientifically based research" (a phrase that appears 111 times in the act) (Hammond 4). While standardized curriculum and increased standards seem like they would improve children's learning, in reality it hurts them by pushing them too hard academically instead of focusing on social development, and denying them specialized attention based upon their individual abilities. The debate surrounding this has become a significant topic since the Act is currently under review and could be in the process of reauthorization. At the time of its inception, both political parties (Republicans and Democrats) supported the NCLB Act, however, both parties are now arguing over its validity. In 2005, there have been slight \adjustments to the regulations first set in 2005 by the Department of Education, but the revisions were not enough to gain full support from both parties. This act has failed to garner support from most Americans, and like most Americans, I also agree that this should not be reinstituted. No Child Left Behind was designed by the Bush administration to reduce the "learning gap" between different groups of students and to ensure better teacher equality. However, it sets fourth a method of measuring…

    • 1081 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays