Preview

Nclb Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1018 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nclb Essay
The Failing of No Child Left Behind Act
Tony Vinson
COM/215
04/02/2013
Alexia Retallack

The failing of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Why did it happen? Who is responsible? What can be done to solve or fix this problem? Congress wrote law, Congress needs rewrite the law. To help solve this issue Congress needs to do is help states, districts and schools build the capacity to implement the common elements and practices, and then hold them accountable for doing so. Congress needs to retake responsibility for making national

education policy from the Executive branch. It needs to focus the nation on what works.

As difficult as it may be, Congress needs to act now, before millions more students are

left behind. Here is a little background on NCLB and where it originated from.

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and close achievement gaps. Passed with overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress, the law was signed by President George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. Clearly, our children are our future, and as President Bush has expressed. This law allows schools to receive reports cards instead of students.
This law was initially passed by Congress in 1965, during President Lyndon Johnson’s term. With the passage of No Child Left Behind, Congress reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), the principal federal law affecting education from kindergarten through high school. In amending ESEA, the new law represents a sweeping overhaul of federal efforts to support elementary and secondary education in United States. Before 1965, all school funds were from local tax dollars. It happen to set an accountability provisions set forth in the NCLB law. The goal was having every child make the grade on state-defined education standards by the end of the 2013-2014 school year. To reach that goal every state has developed



References: McNeil (2011). No Child Left Behind, Education Week, Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/no-child-left-behind/ U.S. Department of Education, Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml California Department of Education, Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/sr/ Johnson, A. (2012). US turns down No Child Left Behind waiver for California, U.S. News, Retrieved from http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/26/16171331-us-turns-down-no-child-left-behind-waiver-for-california?lite Ratner, G. (2013). Overhaul “No Child Left behind” now, The Hill’s, Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/education/288145-overhaul-no-child-left-behind-now

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002 President Bush and democratic Senator Edward M. Kennedy supported the reform bill Np child Left Behind Act. This act created higher standard and goals for schools in order to improve the education system across all the states. There are four main pillars, the first are results, the scores are broken down by demographics and then it is determined if the school is needed to add more programs in order to better the scores. If no improvement is made then the school will have to reorganize. The second is that the funds are more flexible when it comes to spending. The third pillar is government created programs like, “Reading First”. the last pillar is the ability for student’s parents to change their child’s school because the scores are not being met, without extra charge on the school or the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind of 2002 was reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.(ESEA) This a picture of the NCLB law. And the lego of the NCLB Act! No Child Left Behind Act In the year of…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is an extension of President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society program (Klein, 2015). Johnson’s heart was in the right place but after being tweaked so many times I think that government bureaucrats lost sight of the reason for the original act by Johnson. There was such a focus on competing with other countries that children truly got left behind. The government put so much pressure on schools for their students to perform well on testing that schools had no choice but to start teaching to the test and leave other ways of teaching lessons on the back burner. I was a representative on the school board for our school system here where we live, we had the discussion of NCLB many times. One thing that we had discussed about the NCLB is how mentally disabled students were to take the same testing as the other students, and the testing not taking into consideration that those students would never be able to perform to those…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 22, 2011, the Obama Administration released a plan that allows states to receive waivers exempting them from key components of the No Child Left Behind Act. To date, 42 states, including Utah, have received waivers.1 These waivers, however, are granted only through compliance with requirements that are considered by some to be worse than those of NCLB.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American education system has been on a gradual decline over the past several years and has become very non competitive to other nations across the world. This is quite surprising considering the fact that America has one of the most developed and strongest economies in the world yet is so far behind other countries in the education matter. One of the most recent debated issues in the U.S. Department of Education, is the 2002 No Child Left Behind Act signed by former President George W. Bush. According to many education intellects, this act is holding America back from achieving its full potential and getting back on track with the rest of the world. Diane Ravitch, who is a historian of American education, addresses this issue in “Time to Kill ‘No Child Left Behind.’” She says, “Congress should get rid of…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq No Child Left Behind

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They would try to accomplish this by having annual testing in subjects such as math, and reading to see their progress over the course of the school year, and schools would face severe penalties for schools that did not meet the goal that they had set for themselves (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). By having a set of standards that the schools had to keep and having a penalty for schools that did not meet their goal, it sets a parameter that should put a focus on the quality of the education of the child, to make sure they are receiving a quality education. Going back to the penalty section of the policy, this was a good thing to have, when writing the policy. By having a penalty you out a consequence for the schools for not providing a good quality education to the students. If a school did not meet its target goal on their progress reports, students could have the option to change schools if they wished, leadership of the schools could change, or the schools could close down entirely (retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/your-childs-rights/basics-about-childs-rights/no-child-left-behind-nclb-what-you-need-to-know). This is important to know because it showed how seriously people were taking about the…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A hopeful America is one in which not one child is left behind.” This quote from President George W. Bush at a recent news conference represents the current philosophy of our government on education. In 2001 President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The new law is an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which was signed into law in 1965. Since then standardized testing has been a part of our school system in one form or another, yet there is little evidence that these tests have improved children’s learning through the years.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Pros And Cons

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In January 2002 congress, with the encouragement of President Bush, passed a new act that was intended to prevent children from being left behind in education. No Child Left Behind is designed to change the culture of America 's schools by closing the achievement gap, offering more flexibility, giving parents more options, and teaching students based on what works. This was and is a great idea. Children are our future and we need to make sure they get all the opportunities education can give them. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a well intentioned yet fundamentally flawed piece of legislation.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enabaling Ignorance

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No child left behind” act (NCLB) passed this year through congress which was originally passed in 2002, that shows how can be common sense and experience is replaced. The author, Diane Ravitch pointed out in her book that NCLB promotes the weakness in American public school, rather than improving their strengths. The idea of passing NCLB proven wrong, because it is wasting of federal dollars, it increases corruption, and it a-parts teachers from the school system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child-Left Behind Act

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (often referred to as No Child Left Behind) was a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. President George W. Bush described this law as the "cornerstone of my administration" (Department of Education). It allows low-income families, whose children traditionally have less academic opportunities, to move to private school or specialized charter schools via a school voucher. The act was expected to introduce high standards for education, the belief that all children, regardless of class, should have equal opportunities to learn, and accountability for failing school systems. However, the act…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    abby

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, signed into law by President Bush on Jan. 8, 2002, was a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the central federal law in pre-collegiate education. The ESEA, first enacted in 1965 and previously reauthorized in 1994, encompasses Title I, the federal government's flagship aid program for disadvantaged students. It expanded the federal role…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lets first start by explaining what the Act entails. As defined by Wikipedia, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), more commonly known as NCLB, is a United States federal law signed on January 8, 2002 by George Bush, that reauthorizes a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for state, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. NCLB is built on four principles: accountability for results, more choices for parents, greater local control and flexibility, and an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research. Additionally, it promotes an increased focus on reading and re-authorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). NCLB is the latest federal legislation which enact the theories of standards-based education reform, which is based on the belief that high expectations and setting of goals will result in success for all students. Under the new law, every racial and demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math tests to make "adequate yearly progress." This Act tests reading and math skills of…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays