Difference Between Arresting And Recidivism

Bottom line, if a criminal is in prison, they are unable to commit domestic violence on their significant other. So, to ask if arrest should be mandatory? I believe absolutely. However, there are going to be times when individuals mutually get into fights that become physical that are including both partners. I would insist that both parties are arrested for domestic violence. If a woman hits her husband and he returns with a physical response, then they both need to be arrested and have them sit in jail for a long time. That would either teach them not to hit each other, or not be married to that individual anymore, because they are toxic. Studies show that arresting versus a warning has a better effect on the recidivism rate. At the very
least I would recommend arrest, incarceration and rehabilitation. I would even go further to say that the rehabilitation that is provided, would garnish future wages of that individual for the provided care. For instance, if the rehabilitation costs 2000 a month to provide that criminal, then I would garnish his checks 250 a month until he or she has reached a maximum of 20% of the cost. That would not only ease the amount tax payers pay, and facility costs, but also serves as a reminder to not commit domestic violence. It is unfortunate that we even have to discuss domestic violence and the fact that they continue to reoffend. Should there be a mutual site, such as the sexual offender registry that we can put up domestic violent registry? So that women and men, both can have access to data before they further involve themselves with someone? I believe that is a method worth looking