Difference Between Formal And Informal Amendment
In order for an amendment to be added to the constitution there is a long process that needs to be abided by. There are formal and informal ways to make an amendment. The informal way is that the president can change the constitution without actually amending it. In the formal way there needs to be three-fourths of the amendment passed by the state, then two-thirds of a majority vote by the house of representatives and senate. There can also be a constitutional convention held by the state legislatures. The amendment is proposed to congress, and it is taken to both houses of congress. After congress proposes the amendment it is now in the responsibility of the archivist. The archivist then has to follow procedures and rules enforced by the
secretary of state. Since the president doesn't have a role in the amendment process, the joint resolution doesn't go to the white house. If they can get a two-thirds vote from both houses they then need it approved from the state. If they get three-fourths vote of the state legislature then it becomes part of the constitution. Finally, because the new nation was to be a republic in which power was held by the people through elected representatives, it was considered appropriate to leave the ultimate acceptance or rejection of the constitution to the nation's citizens. Article V says that amendments can originate from one or two sources. If convention delegates, who were chosen by popular vote, approved it, then the new government could rightly claim that it ruled with the consent of the people. A second method allows for the petitioning of Congress by the states: Upon receiving such petitions from two-thirds of the states, Congress must call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments, which would then be forwarded to the states for ratification by the required three-quarters. All the current amendments from the constitution were made using the original method. This is the reason why an amendment hasn't been made since 1992. The process is long and difficult.
secretary of state. Since the president doesn't have a role in the amendment process, the joint resolution doesn't go to the white house. If they can get a two-thirds vote from both houses they then need it approved from the state. If they get three-fourths vote of the state legislature then it becomes part of the constitution. Finally, because the new nation was to be a republic in which power was held by the people through elected representatives, it was considered appropriate to leave the ultimate acceptance or rejection of the constitution to the nation's citizens. Article V says that amendments can originate from one or two sources. If convention delegates, who were chosen by popular vote, approved it, then the new government could rightly claim that it ruled with the consent of the people. A second method allows for the petitioning of Congress by the states: Upon receiving such petitions from two-thirds of the states, Congress must call a convention for the purpose of proposing amendments, which would then be forwarded to the states for ratification by the required three-quarters. All the current amendments from the constitution were made using the original method. This is the reason why an amendment hasn't been made since 1992. The process is long and difficult.