Preview

Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1185 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Habeas Corpus And War On Terror
Habeas Corpus and War on Terror
Tanesha O’Neal
POL 201
Instructor Binder
June 23, 2013

We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.
The word “Habeas Corpus” is a Latin word that means “you have the body”, also known as the “Great Writ” and was established by English’s Parliament in 1679 when King Charles II deputies
…show more content…
changed as a whole and was attacked by terrorist lead by Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda is a global militant Islamist organization formed by Osama bin Laden. Al-Qaeda is a very dangerous group who carried out several attacks on Non-Muslims and other targets it considers Kafir. Al-Qaeda had training camp sites in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and Sudan with Osama bin Laden being the notable commander or Senior Operations Chief of Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda carried out six major terrorist attacks, four of them in its jihad against America. Leaders of these attacks normally planned these attacks years in advance. They arranged the shipment of weapons, explosives, and using its privatized business to provide operatives with safe houses and false identities. Members of Al Queada high jacked four air planes plotting to kill many Americans. One of the planes that were high jacked was crashed into the World Trade Center Tower one, while the other plane crashed into the second twin tower, located in New York City. The third plane crashed into the Pentagon, and the fourth plane was headed to Washington D.C., but crashed in Pennsylvania after the passengers tried to take over the plane. Over 3,000 people were killed, including 19 members of Al Queada. The leader of Al Queda, Osama Bin Laden is to this day believed to be the master mind behind not only this attack, but many other attacks that happened through the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror. Soon after the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Bush administration developed a plan for holding and interrogating prisoners captured during the conflict. They were sent to a prison inside a U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay on land leased from the government of Cuba. Since 2002, over 700 men have been detained at “GITMO.” Most have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 6132 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 36699 Words
    • 107 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Compare And Contrast

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The September 11 attacks were a series of suicide attacks by Al-Qaeda upon the United States. On the morning of the attacks 19 of Al-Qaeda’s terrorists hijacked four jet airliners. The hijackers then crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, killing everyone on board and many of those who were working in the buildings. Both of the buildings collapsed within two hours of the collisions. Because of the collapse nearby buildings were damaged, even destroyed. The hijackers crashed the third airplane into the Pentagon which is located in Arlington, Virginia. The fourth plane was crashed into a field near Shanksville in Pennsylvania after some of its passengers attempted to retake control of the plane. Unfortunately…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout history, the motivation of man's self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States whereas terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man's interpretation, in which allows those accused federal and state court representation before judge, or jury. It asserts that accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, accusers possessed the right to representation, appear in person, and charges brought forth. This essay will concentrate on the evolution of habeas corpus, and its suspension by the United States, its relevance during the war on terror, and the United States Supreme Court's interpretation. Nevertheless, these laws are in place to protect every one, moreover to avoid unlawful apprehension, and ensure that habeas corpus works as intended by the Constitution.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fallon Jr., R. H. (2010). THE SUPREME COURT, HABEAS CORPUS, AND THE WAR ON TERROR: AN ESSAY ON LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE. Columbia Law Review, 110(2), 352-398.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On September 11 of 2001 19 militants associated with the Islamic extremist group al-Qaeda hijacked four planes and committed suicide attacks against targets in the U.S. Two of the four planes were flown into the twin towers in…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Known as the “great writ of liberty” (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011), it protects people from been held for a prolonged time and not been informed of the charges against them. The court has to document the illegal act and bring to the judge, the accused. It also gives us access to basic legal protection, like due process and counsel. (Levin-Waldman, O.M., 2012, p.255) With these rights the accused can be informed of his or her rights and can inform the judge of his or her guilt or innocence.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On Tuesday, September 11th, 2001, the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history occurred as four large passenger jets were hijacked then crashed, killing nearly 3,000 persons. The attack was carried out by four separate teams of terrorists from the Middle East, all operating from inside the U.S. Each team had boarded an early-morning flight, posing as passengers, then forcibly commandeered the aircraft. Two fully-fueled jumbo jets, American Airlines Flight 11 carrying 92 persons and United Airlines Flight 175 carrying 65 persons, had departed Boston for Los Angeles. Both jets were diverted by the hijackers to New York City where they were piloted by the terrorists themselves into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center. The impact and subsequent fire caused both 110-story towers…

    • 3254 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Civil Liberties History

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Habeas corpus and the war on terror have only grown increasingly relevant as days pass. One of the more well-known uses of habeas corpus stems from the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. It was on the wake of this historical tragedy that President Bush not only launched a war on terrorism, but the USA PATRIOIT Act of 2001 was passed. As a wartime measure, the PATRIOT Act allowed federal authorities to arrest and hold suspected terrorists without filing formal charges. Individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism were not entitled to an attorney (Levin-Waldman, 2012). In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), the Supreme Court ruled the prisoners had limited rights at his or her disposal with which to challenge the enemy combatant characterization (Foley, 2007). The debate over habeas corpus has erupted in an emotional time of healing for United States citizens. What is difficult to grasp is that in the midst of tragedy, in the center of emotional turmoil, in the middle of a nation full of questions, habeas corpus is a civil liberty, like many others that desperately required clarification in a changing…

    • 2698 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right.” (Robertson, 2002). It comes from the Anglo-Saxon common law origin. The Precise of the origin is still unknown, but it still has been used. “Although practice surrounding the writ has evolved over time, Habeas Corpus has since the earliest times been employed to compel the appearance of a person who is in custody to be brought before a court.” (Robertson, 2002). The British colony brought habeas corpus from England and has been used in the United States since the American Revolutionary War. Habeas corpus is found in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It states that “the Habeas Corpus should not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”(Neuman,…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right of Habeas Corpus

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Right of Habeas Corpus is derived from the Latin meaning “you have the body. The meaning according to the U.S. Constitution is the right of any person to question their incarceration before a judge. The violating of this right has not been the most severe of the civil liberties granted to not only Americans but many other countries. The biggest violation of this right was when the Busch administration held hundreds of suspected terrorist from the Afghan and Iraqi terror attacks of 9/11. The first real act of Habeas Corpus comes from the passage of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 through 1915. At that time the court denied Leo Frank this right during a murder trial. Some other interesting evolutions of this act throughout history are Lincoln 's Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus this was a historical moment for this right of the constitution. “Lincoln 's power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus was extensively explored during the Civil War, but since then his suspensions have escaped detailed scrutiny despite the controversy they provoked, their widespread and effective use to combat malignant opposition to the war, and their uncertain grounding in the Constitution.” Under the Constitution the federal government can unquestionably suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus if the public safety requires it during times of rebellion or invasion. The issue is whether Congress or the president holds this power. I think this is why during the 9/11 attacks President Bush felt he could detain all those people because of this right.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Habeas corpus translates to “you should have the body” and is basically a right for those who are imprisoned unlawfully. It was derived from english common law. It was first used in Magna Carta of 1215, and it is the oldest human right in all of the known english speaking civilizations. Habeas corpus is a serious problem in our society today in America that is raising a serious question on whether or not people suspected of terrorism should have those rights. I personally believe that based off of what happens to people, and how people are treated who don't have the rights of habeas corpus, that they should have those rights at least until they are proven guilty.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays