Preview

Difference Between International Relations And Security

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between International Relations And Security
Module International Relations and Security comprise of several topics that centered on relation between two or more countries and security aspect within the relations. There are several approaches which define the disposition towards world affairs which can be analyzed in all historical periods such as idealism, realisms and interdependence. Idealism can be defined particularly in two ways which are broad and narrow in professional study. Idealism can be said as an optimistic doctrine which seeks to go beyond the international anarchy which create more modern and harmonious world order and it is highly influenced by League of Nations of Woodrow Wilson in 1917.The constraint on politics which imposed by human nature and the absence of international …show more content…
The breach of International law may lead to severe implication to the world such as wars, conflict, disarmament, International terrorism, and trafficking in arms, persons and drugs. So it is crucial for all states to obey International law to avoid sanction. We also discuss treaty making process and how Malaysia Constitutional Framework on International Law and treaties. As I understand although Malaysia also signed a number of treaties still it must comply with doctrine of transformation and it is exclusive domain of federal …show more content…
We also ready to compromise, as long as harmony is preserved and win-win attitude already incorporated in Malaysian way of life. Malaysia need to learn more in order to improve negotiation skill especially from our neighboring country, Singapore where they adopted a business-like approach and always like to package it deals. They are very professional in its preparation, during and after where top person attends the negotiation, write the report directly after the negotiation ends and only certain individual speak during the negotiation and it prove effective in their own
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    syllabus of psci104
    • 1300 Words
    • 8 Pages

    syllabus of psci104

    International politics is about conflicts and cooperation over the distribution of limited resources among nation-states and non-state actors who aim to maximize their welfare (i.e. security, wealth, etc.). The course is divided into three parts. 1) Actors and concepts in international relations: the first part of the course will focus on the major theoretical approaches to international politics, state and non-state actors and their roles in international politics. 2) International security: the main themes in the second part of the course include the causes of war and peace, international cooperation, alliances, deterrence, nuclear proliferation, etc. 3) International political economy: the last part involves international trade, globalization, and economic development in the less-developing countries. The course is designed to achieve the following objectives: I) to provide students an introduction to and a general familiarity with the concepts and analytical tools used in the study of international relations; II) to introduce students to the major debates and issues in international relations; and III) to promote the ability of…

    • 1300 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Ww1 Change Us Foreign Policy
    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did Ww1 Change Us Foreign Policy

    The war had heavily taxed American resources and its people causing many Americans to believe that they would be safer if they would stay out of the foreign affairs, a view having its roots in George Washington’s farewell address. This view’s had made itself apparent in studies of the American public, such as in 1935, when the Nye committee concluded that American participation in World War I was simply a result of a plot by arms manufacturers to increase their revenue. Also, Isolationism wasn’t an idea unique to the public, as the government was also isolationist. After World War I, President Woodrow Wilson drafted the “fourteen points”, his blueprint for world peace. In the document was the idea of a “league of nations”, a group of nations who would prevent conflict, a fledgling United Nations.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    WK 5 Assignment
    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages

    WK 5 Assignment

    The International Relations theory that best fits the Gini-out-of-the-bottle approach for this report is the theory of realism. There are five different classes of realism but the two that stands out to me are classic and neorealism. Classic realism leans towards those that represent a pessimistic view and the fact that people are not often what they appear to be and they it would behoove a government not to be so trusting of others. Neorealism represents the struggle of someone that is greedy for more such as power.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Was Wilsonianism?
    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Was Wilsonianism?

    On the surface, Wilsonianism can be defined as the rhetoric attributed to President Woodrow Wilson and his advocacy for a new world order based on progressive ideals such as self-determination, collective security and international economic openness. In a deeper sense, it was a strategic ideology that promoted a new international order based on altruistic ideals while providing the international framework that protected and advanced American economic and security interests. One of the main promises of Wilsonianism included national self-determination but the reality of the postwar situation limited the implementation of this principle. Wilson’s desire to have people establish their own nations was evident in his “Fourteen Points”…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Woodrow Wilson
    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson

    In this monograph, Woodrow Wilson greatly attempted to maintain peace before entering World War I. The reason Wilson established the League of Nations to passionately pursue this goal. Link emphasizes that the president even chased this…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    International Relations
    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    International Relations

    Buzan, B. 1997. Rethinking Security after the Cold War. Cooperation and Conflict. Vol. 32, No. 1: 5-28.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Significant Impact of Ww1
    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Significant Impact of Ww1

    The League of Nations. During and in the immediate aftermath of the ‘war to end all wars’ The creation of the League of Nations in 1919/20 acted as the deterrent to any future major conflict and as an organisation of nations for the purpose of guaranteeing political independence and territorial integrity to all nations. Morally and as is clearly evident in 1945 with the advent of its successor, the UN, one would struggle to justify challenging the League’s…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oprah Winfrey
    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Oprah Winfrey

    According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, luck is defined as good fortune, prosperity or success. Opportunity is defined as a set of circumstances that makes it possible to do something. Oprah Winfrey states, "Luck is a matter of preparation meeting opportunity," as an inspirational tool for her audience to reach their goals by putting in the hard work. Opportunities in life are not just handed out but these chances are opened by the determination and drive that each individual puts forth instead of wishing on luck and chance that their goals will be reached.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using Two Other Theories to Back Up Your Assertions Discuss the Extent to Which Realism Remains Central to International Relations Today.
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Using Two Other Theories to Back Up Your Assertions Discuss the Extent to Which Realism Remains Central to International Relations Today.

    The outlook that realism remains central to international relations today is based largely on the prospect that states are taking advantage of the anarchic setting constructed by the issue that there is no overriding world government that enforces a common code of rules for everyone to follow. This therefore means that actors in international politics are at liberty to act in any manner they believe is best for their own…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hitler's Responsibility of World War Ii
    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hitler's Responsibility of World War Ii

    After the First World War, many collective security plans and appeasement policies were established by European nations- the League of Nations, the Stressa Front, etc… to ensure safety for the old powers, such as France or Britain, who felt insecure witnessing the rise in power of Germany, Italy, and Russia; however, the outbreak of World War II proved the weaknesses of the collective security, which were the most prominent cause to the failure of international diplomacy, and in addition to Germany’s aggression, led to the eventual outbreak of the Second World War. As an invention from the First World War, heavily supported by President Wilson of the United States, the League of Nations was formed in order to keep peace; however, the plan inevitably failed its purpose when the leading power of the world at the time, the United States, was occupied in her own domestic affairs and refused to enforce her proposals. Therefore, it is clearly observable how the League of Nations did not have the amount of power it requires to interfere in the events of violations, for example, the League of Nations did not take action when France takes over the Ruhr in 1923. Moreover, crisis in Ethiopia effectively portrayed the fears of the members that resulted in the failure of the League, as the weaker states felt indignant that they were not treated fairly by the larger powers, who only pursued to protect their own interests. While it is the “League of Nations”, it was not seen as a true global powner without an armed force; furthermore, many nations never joined, significantly the United States. Consequently, countries realized that international law was not respected, and aggressive states such as Italy, Germany and Japan had learnt that they still had the chance to overcome “international law.” In addition to the League’s lack of power, members had not adapted their foreign policy to change from a typical aim – only acting for their own self-interest, instead of looking after the…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Idealism and Realism in International Relation
    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Idealism and Realism in International Relation

    Idealism in International Relations (For K. Dowding (ed.), Encyclopedia of Power, Sage 2011) In general parlance on international matters, idealism is a term applied to any idea, goal, or practice considered to be impractical. Thus eradicating nuclear weapons is considered idealistic, as is substituting open for secret diplomacy, entrusting international security to the UN, creating an African Union on the model of the EU, or the global eradication of poverty and injustice. The bases of such judgments are rarely made explicit, but they usually rest on a pessimistic reading of human nature along with an historical judgment on the difficulty of peaceably achieving radical change in world affairs.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Realism vs. Liberalism
    • 1438 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Realism vs. Liberalism

    “International politics, like all politics, is a struggle for power. Whatever the ultimate aims of international politics, power is always the immediate aim. Statesmen and peoples may ultimately seek freedom, security, prosperity, or power itself. They may define their goals in terms of a religious, philosophic, economic, or social ideal. They may hope that this ideal will materialize through its own inner force, through divine intervention, or through the natural development of human affairs. They may also try to further its realization through non-political means, such as technical co-operation with other nations or international organizations. But whenever they strive to realize their goal by means of international politics, they do so by striving for power.”2…

    • 1438 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Idealism vs Realism in International Relations
    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Idealism vs Realism in International Relations

    The international relations schools of thought known as Realism and Idealism identify specific and similar characteristics of actors in the conceptual development of their theories. While many of these characteristics can be generalized as being synonymous between the two theories, both theories make a separate distinction in what specifically constitutes an actor. In Realism, the term “actor” refers directly and solely to the state: a combination of government, leaders, decision-makers, etc, that act as a unitary entity to promote the interests of the state. Idealists however expand on what constitutes an actor to include both the state and people. Not only do the principles of Idealism assert that the state and people should be considered actors, in fact both they must be viewed as actors. Actors have interests; while realists such as Machiavelli insist the state is the only unit of analysis necessary in international politics, idealists argue that just as states have interests, people in government have interests as well.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparison of International Relations Theory
    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Comparison of International Relations Theory

    Contemporary international relations is a complex field. Understanding events and attempting to make sense of them can be a daunting task. There are, however, tools available, which can assist in providing clarity to these complex issues. The first of these tools is historic knowledge. Without historic background of an issue, it is nearly impossible to understand the events driving that issue in modern times. A second tool, the one which will be the focus of this paper, is international relations theory. Theory can be defined as “a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action,” (Merriam-Webster) and can be used “in many cases as a basis of prediction.” (Mingst 56) There are three major theories which we can use to analyze events: liberalism, realism, and constructivism. These theories provide us with different points of view from which to analyze issues in today’s world. By looking at events, both past and present, in the context of a given theory, we can begin to understand those events and the driving forces behind them, as well as to make predictions about future events.…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What does it meant by International Relations
    • 3818 Words
    • 16 Pages

    What does it meant by International Relations

    the use of power among the states. International Relations is a process by which the…

    • 3818 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics