Difference Between Karl Marx and Oscar Wild’s Socialism and Also Criticism of Human Nature Within Socialism for Aesthetes

Difference Between Karl Marx And Oscar Wild’s Socialism And Also Criticism Of Human Nature Within Socialism For Aesthetes There has been and still are lots of ways in order to achieve the perfect harmony between people and nature, therefore they keep on living within this manner. Lots of attempts have been done to obtain this aim until now. Beyond these attempts to attain a harmony with nature, a slight difference appears within human nature itself; that is the ability to control own actions. However animals are just living through their base animal instincts. Individuals’ ability is to take their own decisions according to their own will generated self-oriented society in which people owned lands and animals to fulfill their fundamental needs as they thought that they were given superiority. As written in Genesis; ‘’Have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the fowl of the air and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth”. All these facts resulted in a selfish, egoistic, self centered societies which by time even started to feel supremacy against each other due to the property they possessed. So wealth became the symbol of power among them.

By time individuals’ evil side started to emerge due to their self-oriented habit, so people started to seek ways to dwell together and also to maintain justice and security, therefore people constitued government as the last progress. The presence of government and how should it be has been questioned numerous times and also has been the subject of various debates and essays, therefore many different ideas have been emerged from various cultures and orders which have tried to reach perfection. Thus conflicts have also started between these unusual ideas that are called utopias. Oscar Wild also wrote and represented his own utopia in ‘’The Soul Of Man Under Socialisim ‘’. Wild in his essay emphasises