Preview

Differences Between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
803 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X
During the 1960’s Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X represented two sides of the Civil Rights Movement. Speaking to all of humanity, Dr. King made these famous peaceful words, “I have a dream, a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal” (King, 1963, para 10). Malcolm X spoke of a violent revolution by claiming, “If it’s necessary to form a Black Nationalist army, we’ll form a Black Nationalist army. It’ll be the ballot or the bullet. It’ll be liberty or it’ll be death” (Malcolm X, 1964, para. 55). These two inspirational leaders were fighting for the same cause; equal rights for black Americans. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X had very different beliefs and tangible differences in the actions of their followers in how to achieve equal rights for black Americans. Dr. Martin Luther King was fighting for a color-blind society where people would be judged and valued on their skills and characters rather than the color of their skin. Malcolm X, on the other hand, was fighting in favor of a separate black nation, instead of integration of all races. Dr. Martin Luther King preached non-violent means of expression and actions that he believed were the most effective method to achieve the goal of equality. Dr. King’s non-violent methods had the ability to not only influence people of color, but also people in positions of power, including President Kennedy. During the time that Dr. King fought for civil rights, the Civil Rights Act was passed; buses, schools, and lunch counters were desegregated (Moss and Thomas, p. 102-105). Dr. King’s efforts gave the Civil Rights Movement national and worldwide attention, lessening the segregation gap between people of color and white Americans. Dr. King was successful in using nonviolence as an effective tool to battle racial discrimination to achieve justice and


References: Biography.Com. (1997-2010). Biography Of Martin Luther King, Jr. Retrieved July 10, 2010, from Bio True Story: http://www.biography.com/articles/Martin-Luther-King-Jr.- X, M. (2010). Malcolm X. Retrieved July 9, 2010, from Encyclopedia Of World Biography: http://www.notablebiographies.com/Lo-Ma/Malcolm-X.html X, M. (1964, April 3). The Ballot Or The Bullet. Retrieved July 9, 2010, from Social Justice Speeches: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/speeches/malcolm_x_ballot.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Because of the life that Malcolm X and Martin Luther King lived was responsible for the distinct different responses to American racism. Both men were important to the African-American culture and had a great influence on black Americans. However, King had a more positive attitude than Malcolm X. He believed that through peaceful demonstrations and arguments blacks were able to someday achieve full equality with whites. Because Malcolm X’s life was reflected by angry and pessimistic belief he thought that equality was impossible because whites had no moral conscience. King basically adopted on an integrationalist philosophy that thought that blacks and whites should be united and live together in peace, but Malcolm X promoted nationalist and separatist doctrines. For most of his life, he believed that only through revolution and…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With many different views it is difficult to remember Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both fighting the same war for the same people. King and Malcolm X fought the same battle using different methods. Both wanted to end racism and discrimination. King agreed with Malcolm X that Blacks had to love themselves. Both were instilled with a hope for a better day, society and world. King dreamed of a society of peace, freedom, justice, and equality. They became role models for African-American youth and achieved much with their efforts. They introduced self-pride to their people. Both methods were effective. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both great men who died trying to make their home and country better but in the end both men’s…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    also defined their character. After a close look at both, I believe Malcolm X was a better leader against…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malcolm x and Martin Luther King Jr. are both powerful leaders. Malcolm X believed in violence and Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence. These two leader shared belief and hopes but they also had their differences. Malcolm X was born in Omaha, Nebraska on May 19, 1925. Malcolm did not believe in nonviolence or advocate integration. (Harold 610) He attracted black people’s attention and was eloquent, passionate, and a courageously out spoken champion of black people and a critic of American racism.…

    • 562 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However there methods deferred because X was more aggressive and attacking while King was passive and trying to shame the people if the United States to make change. Malcolm X was a man who wanted to put aside differences among his own people and the people of the world to make a change that can be long lasting. MLK on the other hand was trying to fix the American system internally and by bringing the people up against the government. Regardless of their differences both were people who were influential in shaping the world into what we see and know today as they have brought forth civil rights legislature into fruition. The battles they fought allowed for many changes to be made that have given people the opportunities they were denied but…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King and Malcolm X each suggest radically different approaches to attaining freedom and equality for African-Americans in American society. Dr. King's approach was against violence by all means. He stated that “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding; it seeks to annihilate rather than to convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love.” Dr. King was a firm believer in the power of unconditional love. He did not want to stoop to the level of the racists to attain equality. Malcolm X, on the other hand, believed that it was every…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X’s understandings of racial inequality and their probable solutions, I believe they held conflicting views on resolutions for racial inequality based on their attitudes toward Whites. Martin Luther King Jr. advocated for the integration of African Americans and Whites, while Malcolm X advocated for the separation of the two races. I believe their viewpoints concerning the previous statement influenced their solution to end the problem of racial…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through an analysis of the PBS video, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, and several passages from The Autobiography of Malcolm X, it can be concluded that while the two men wanted the same thing, they both had different views and beliefs; Malcolm X was angry, bitter and vengeful, while Martin Luther King Jr. was only concerned with fixing the issue at hand.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although separated by a century, Malcolm X and Frederick Douglass advocated for the equality and freedom of African Americans at all costs. Despite criticism, Malcolm X’s fiery speeches and teachings in the twentieth century wanted people to understand the white man’s inner devil. Frederick Douglass wanted to inform northerners about the horrors of slavery with his speeches. Both men wanted justice and equality for the African Americans living in America. Neither gave up and used anything they could find to let their voices be heard.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mlk Vs Malcolm X Essay

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the fifties and sixties, two main figureheads campaigned for equal African American civil rights, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Although both aimed to end the divide of inequality and racism, they went about in leading this change in very different ways. Malcolm X was influenced by his hate of white supremacy and need racial separation, yet equality, through any means necessary. While Martin Luther King Jr was motivated by his want for racial equality and complete integration through peace. Both leaders used public speeches and their faith to influence the public however King focused on success through peaceful protest and civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed in pushing where it hurt and forcing whites to accept blacks as…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1960s Dbq

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Malcolm X and King were both fighting for the Black’s but with different ideas. King wanted White’s and Black’s to get along so that their future children will live in a world where people are not judged based by their color of their skin or race. King wanted to achieve this goal through non-violence, which did help in the long run. Malcolm X wanted Black’s and White’s to work and be educated separately. X wanted to accomplish this through violence. The reason that I think that King’s philosophy was better for the 1960’s because it was time for a change. Many people were to afraid of change, so they just needed a push; which is what King did. King gave them a push so they can do what’s right. This is my opinion, whose philosophy do you think was better for the 1960’s, Martin Luther King Jr or Malcolm…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King and Malcolm Civil Rights Movement. They were trying to fight for African American during the civil right movement. They both had very different philosophies, but whose philosophy made the most sense for America in the 1960s? Malcolm X, a great leader in the Civil Right era, had a very tough life at a young age because of his father dying and his mother having a mental break was sent to foster house. Malcolm X got his ideas by going to jail because of drugs from Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam. Malcolm X believed in segregation and also violence if necessary. MLK was a middle class family, kid and faced racism at a young age. MLK was more towards integration and didn't believe in violence. MLK and Malcolm X both had great philosophies, but only some of their philosophies were effective in the 1960s for America.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with all men. These words spoken by Christ can be found in Romans 12:8 that refer to living in peace with everyone. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are both men that fought and petitioned for equality for black people. Did they both have different approaches and views on how to obtain said peace and equality? Absolutely. Martin Luther King Jr. believed in the pacifist way for reaching the level of peace that was desired by the general black community and himself. Malcolm X, on the other hand, was not as passive and didn’t believe in the nonviolent method that Dr. King did. Malcolm X believed that getting peace by any means necessary and…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The context in which a statement is made can change the entire meaning of what was said. This is why many times people will use context as a defense for statements they make that offend or cause some sort of public backlash. The manner in which a person delivers a message and what messages the rhetor chooses to deliver can be a great indication of foundation of that persons value and belief system. There are a number of value systems present in Malcolm X’s “The Ballot or the Bullet” speech that he delivered in the storied election year of 1964. There are many statements made in the ballot or the bullet speech that would paint Malcolm X in negative light. Though, the manner in which a statement is delivered relevant to the context can make the difference between a person being labeled positively or negatively. Often, when people read the words of Malcolm X in present day, without knowledge of the historical situation, his messages and his identity as a diplomat and a visionary, can get distorted. I think many fail to realize the contextual situation that Malcolm X was involved in, which caused him to come off as militant or aggressive. When really his word choice was a product of his passion and pride in what he believed in. I think many consider Martin Luther King Jr. to be the driving force behind the civil rights movement but there is just as much to be said about Malcolm X. Malcolm X is one of the most discussed, but least understood figures of contemporary history (Varda, pg.3). Malcolm X’s speech ” The Ballot or the Bullet“ was a speech given in the wake of the passing of the civil rights bill and was a call to action to not just the African American community but to all of those United States citizens who claimed to believe in human rights. The call to action was to not be satisfied and pretend like they are “Eating…

    • 2490 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kings Sexism

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcom X are seen as unprecedented heroes of the Civil Rights movement. They relentlessly campaigned for equality between blacks and whites. Through their powerful leadership and strategic rhetoric they became Messiah like figures and generated a huge following throughout the United States and the rest of the world. Although the rhetoric of Martin and Malcom had an enormous impact on the progress of the civil rights movement, we should not romanticize these men. Despite the positive change they brought to the civil rights movement each had their limitations, which came in the form of prejudices. Both Martin and Malcolm advocated for violence against whites and had sexist views on women. This essay will argue that although each mans prejudicial views changed over the course of their work, these changes were minor when compared to two earlier, prominent black advocates for women’s rights, Freidrick Douglass and W.E.B Du Bois.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays