Perhaps all the answers lie within Capitalism, which in fact is the driving force of Globalization, there is no profit in any of the answers to the above, we are so wrap up in the idea of financial gain that most of the time we forget that money will not prevent us from catching a disease, it maybe help you pay for the best treatment, but if there is no cure, then it is too late. So to me focusing on the development of sectors related to medicine and human biology is way more important than producing the next iPhone, not that these gadgets aren't unique and important, but this is the only way at these point to alter the effects of globalization, I do not think it can be contained unless we go back to medieval times and stop communicating and diseases kill have of the population, which in turn wouldn't be a progressive move. The best alternative is tackle cause and effect, which in most part are us and the climate changes that we are causing, in general as a species we need fully understand of it (Education) and then suppress (research and development) these causes so the Planet and we, the biological entities within, can further heal into a better …show more content…
However I am pro science and the mapping of DNA are very unique and important factor helps find cure and prevention for the same diseases that plagues globalization and in this case so is GMO food, when it helps enhance the nutritious contents in it, as per the example in the text about anemia, which is cause by the improper consumption of iron, therefore causing low red blood cells counts responsible for fatigue, dizziness, leaving the body more vulnerable, genetic modification in food can help fight anemia affecting 56% of the pregnant women worldwide. The claims from scientists is that the are in no way harmful to humans, and sometimes even better the natural produce, but they also can not deny that it can be malevont, however there are not enough evident to it to outweigh the benefits that are currently seen. Opponents also have good points in the case of endangering biodiversity, vulnerability to crop diseases, but not of it has been fully proven or researched, it all mere