Preview

Disadvantages Of The Union And Confederacy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Disadvantages Of The Union And Confederacy
a) The Union and Confederacy both had advantages and disadvantages. The North had better advantages because they had a higher populace, more industry, and better assets than the South. It had a better banking system that they could rely upon to help them raise money for the fight. Furthermore, the North had more ships and a had a proficient and larger railroad framework. On the other hand, the South had the benefit of fighting in a familiar region protecting their property, homes, and families. Another favorable position that the South had was having that military training background on the battle field. The disadvantage that happened in the North were attempting to take the Southerners back to the Union, and by doing that they would need to attack and hold the South in their intimidating populace. The South faced material disadvantages. They had a smaller population of free man to manufacture an armed force. It had a couple of facilities to help distribute weapons, food, and other supplies. The South experienced issues conveying food, weapons, and supplies to …show more content…
The reason that I feel the Union victory was inevitable because the North had a greater population advantage over the South. This means that the North could draft and build a bigger army than the South. Also, the North was able to capture New Orleans in 1862. New Orleans was the key port in Confederacy and its catch in every practical sense divided the Western Confederacy from the major body. Since the South had no potential to recapture the city, then it would be a matter of time before the economy would fail. Not to mention that the Confederacy did not have a significant navy. Without a naval force, the Confederacy had no capacity to forbid the Union's economy; nor would it be able to break the Union's barricade of its ports. While there were minor naval conflicts all through the war, the absence of a naval force rushed the finish point of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The north relied heavily on industry and commerce, while the south relied heavily on plantations and agriculture. They were also seeing completely different views on the subject of slavery. Three big causes of the Civil War were that of states vs. federal rights, slavery within territories, and the abolition movement.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Why the North Won the Civil War, Henry Steele Commager believed that there were multiple causes that led the confederacy to their defeat and that it was “an inevitability in history.” While many historians believed the North won due to their economic, military, diplomatic, and social aspects, Richard N. Current stated that the Union won the Civil War due to their “fundamental economic superiority.” He believed the North sustained a vast and overwhelming economic superiority in men and materials, giving them “an advantage of almost five to two” in everything. The Union succeeded because they were productive with their economy, unlike the Confederates.…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The North won the Civil War for various reasons. The North had better resources, they had 22 million people verses in the South where they only had about 15.5 million people. They also had more tracks 22 thousand miles while the South had only 9 thousand. The train was used to the Northerners advantage because they could get their supplies faster like food, ammunition, water and clean clothes. The South didn't have the industry to produce good and the ports were all blocked so other imports from other counties couldn't come in.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One factor that had the greatest impact in driving the country in war was the economic difference. The North and the South had different opinion and beliefs making them divide as a region. The Invention of cotton gin by Eli Whitney in 1793 made gathering cotton possible. This caused an increase in plantations to grow cotton which caused the great need for cheap labor. It meant that slaves were the cheap labor to get the work done. The southern economy became dependent on slavery and cotton. While in the northern states it was established on industry. North was purchasing raw cotton and turning it into finished goods. In the North people had to work together it didn't matter about their culture or class they were but rather had to put their…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time. Time was the key reason for the North's victory and was achieved through a combination of the first and second reasons. As the war progressed the Union's blockade, largely a paper tiger at the beginning due to the fact that the Navy didn't have enough ships to properly enforce it, became a real blockade that slowly strangled the Confederacy to death. And as the war progressed the South, even before the end of the prisoner exchange, was losing men it could not afford to lose to attrition. Supplies and transportation of supplies. As stated in the first reason, the North was less dependant on Europe than the South was for supplies. There should be little doubt that the South was able to manufacture supplies needed to fight the war, but never in amounts it needed. Industry in the North was a bit larger than it was in the South and was thus able to out produce that of the South. But being able to out produce the South was all well and good unless the South could get the supplies to its troops in the field faster. It then became important to capture major railroad junctions and thus cut off the South's ability to move supplies in a timely…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The loss of the South in the Civil War was the result of various contributions. First of all, they were underequipped in artillery and production factories. The South’s population was about one fourth of the North’s excluding slaves. They were not united and lost because their own philosophical beliefs that destroyed them. Further, the South was underequipped and outclassed in everything industrially. They’re only hope of taking a military advantage was support from European countries. However, those connections were cut when the North blockaded the South and when the North incited the European public to support the North’s effort preventing European interference. Although there was a high morale to serving the Confederacy and to destroying the Union cause, they didn’t have the materials to do so. Many would just fight with stones or any primitive makeshift weapon they could use when they were depleted of bullets because of their low artillery production. The South also had much less supply lines. Their railroads were half that of the North’s and became less as the North decimated the South’s rail lines. The North figured that it would be wiser to destroy their supply lines and weaken the troops. However destroying food lines wouldn’t be a problem because the South couldn’t even supply food because as men were drafted into the army, the agricultural farms withered away due to lack of maintenance. Another disadvantage would be the size of the South. The ratio of people of South to North was about 3 to 7. However 3.5 million of those Southern people were slaves, so the actual ratio would be about 1 to 4. Considering the North’s territorial advantage over the South, it is impressive to see that the South could sustain such a defense over the four years of the war. The reason could be that the South had better trained generals such as…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States (U.S.) Constitution is the source of all government powers and provides limitations on the government that protect the natural rights of U.S. citizens. Prior to its creation, the 13 original states comprising the U.S., were united under the Articles of Confederation. These articles entrusted a Confederate Congress with the authority to wage war, mediate disputes between states as well as set weights and measures. However, the Confederate Congress was completely funded by individual states, did not have the authority to raise funds itself and all decisions required a unanimous vote of approval from all states. It was far from a perfect government. These limitations along with the historical tendencies high ranking officials have toward greed and abuse of power rendered this Congress ineffective, spawning a collective desire for reform. (Whitehouse.gov, 2017) In 1787 delegates from 12 of the 13 states convened in Philadelphia to draft a new Constitution. Their goals were to design a government that could provide fair treatment to its citizens, keep peace amongst the individual states as well as with outside nations, defend our country from enemies, and to set a standard for living comfortably, well, and free. To achieve this, the government was split into three separate branches and power divided amongst them.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Civil War times the Union and Confederates had some large disadvantages and advantages. The Union has a bigger population and 12 more states than the Confederates . That all helps with the amount of soldiers they had to keep fighting. According to ushistory.org, “The North had an enormous industrial advantage as well.” Then they have a lot of supplies to make it through the battle.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Industrially the South couldn't keep up in output of weapons, ammunition and other supplies. That is one of the main reasons the South looked overseas for help. Jefferson Davis knew that the South was at a disadvantage so he looked to England and France. By the end of the war, the South had, more or less, plenty of weaponry still, but it just didn't have enough men to use the guns. By getting either England or France on the Confederate side, supplies would have been more plentiful and also it would have inevitably ended up doing great damage economically to England's maritime trade. However, the fact remained that foreign recognition was denied to the Confederacy in all its attempts.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The North won the Civil War because they had many advantages including a large population, more advanced transportation, and a better war strategy. “It could draw soldiers and workers from a population of 22 million, compared with the South’s 5.5 million” (William Deverell and Deborah Gray White, United States History: Independence to 1914, California Edition, pp. 474-5). A larger population meant more people to fight in the war, which gave the Union a better chance of winning. On the other hand, the South approximately had one-fourth of the North’s population, and as a result they lost the war.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the systems of goverment, there are bound to be many disadvantages, as well as advantages. Ultimatley, the disadvantages and advantages all depend on the size of the state and nation. If there is a larger population, there is automatically a larger window of subjects that make it a go, and subjects that make it a no. Smaller populations tend to have a lower group to choose from. Together there are three branches, Unitary, Confederate, and Federal.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the end the south actually had several and harsh problems with their food supply. As recorded it cites,”Without Civil War food and water an army soon disintegrates into nothing more than a lot of starving people with no energy or will to fight.” and described in my first paragraph no man will survive on that field not being fed. “Confederate soldiers usually didn’t receive much food at all especially as the war dragged on.” showing that these men were dieing of starvation and at the point of surrendering. Now food isn't the exact way to win a war, but it may be the way the confederates lost. The Confederates completely forgot one thing they sent so many men to war that none were home to fix the garden/ plantation. Remember this and if they had been home 6 percent owned slaves at the time and what was their cash crop at that time? Their cash crop was cotton which tore the soil into crap(idk what to say besides that). So if they had to change they would have to first relocate their field, plant the seeds, wait for it to grow and not much men where there to do this labor because both the union and the south resorted to a draft for more men to battle for their side. The South not only were stuck inside there territory…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Union had a significantly larger population than the Confederacy. The Union had a population over 22 million people while the Confederacy had 9 million. The Union had a well organized government. The government was already establishment and experienced. They had an easier…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canada West’s population is rapidly growing (larger than Canada East’s at this point), overwhelmingly Protestant, and English speaking. The Hudson’s Bay Company is presently in control of the western lands. The Great Coalition was formed in 1864 and is the beginning of the long road to escaping political deadlock, as it united Reformers and Conservatives. Agriculture and lumber are the main industries. The Grand Trunk Railway is integral to the colony’s economy and the existing rail network has made Toronto the commercial centre. One cannot currently travel from Canada West to the Maritime colonies without going through the United States. Great Britain’s reluctance to defend its colonies overseas has made closer ties between the British North…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays