Preview

Discretion In Cjs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
584 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discretion In Cjs
Discretion plays an indispensable role in the criminal justice system (CJS). Discretion is the judgment or decision implemented through values, facts, and principles. In the CJS, it is the authority given to a decision maker to decide between alternatives or no alternatives. Discretion can be used by police in the area of the criminal investigation process. Its role is continuous from sentencing judgments to the point of detaining offenders in prison past their sentencing period. Discretion also allows individuals’ circumstances to be considered, as the law at times can be considered a blunt measurement in delivering an alternative. This demonstrates that discretion plays an important role in the CJS to enforce the law, whilst taking into account the rights of individuals.
Police’s discretion in the CJS is regulated under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) (LEPR) Act 2002 (NSW). Under the LEPR Act 2002 (NSW), police use their discretion to enforce the law, and to make informed decisions based on a number of factors including the severity of the crime committed, the situation revolving
…show more content…
A Taser is an electrical weapon used by the NSW Police Force. It is designed to incapacitate human beings and to prevent fatalities and permanent injuries. The use of Tasers by the NSW Police Force is regulated under the LEPR Act 2002 (NSW), which highlights that police are not to use Tasers until they have properly assessed the situation and the environment. Tasers are used to protect human life, police, or anyone who is in danger of any bodily risk, violent confrontation or violent resistance. Under the LEPR Act 2002 (NSW), police are accountable and responsible for their use of force and must be able to justify their use of a Taser. This demonstrates that discretion through the use of a Taser protects individuals from harm, as well as meeting the needs of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Prior to the above recommendations, there was no provincial regulation regarding when a CEW may be used and each police force was free to develop its own use-of-force model, without any guidelines to follow (Braidwood, 2009, 8, para. 2). Braidwood further states that the existing definition of ‘active resistance’, the current threshold, is not set high enough to warrant the deployment of CEWs. As such, a person who simply runs away from police, without causing injury, could be tasered (Braidwood, 2009, 16, para.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser Vs Xrep Essay

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Most importantly, ECD’s prevent the use of other dangerous alternatives such as guns, pepper spray, or nightsticks. Also, in the personal interview with Corporal Streett, he brought up an interesting fact about police officers’ training in regards to lethal force. “Shooting to incapacitate” when using a Taser means to aim anywhere on the body except for the face and chest, which seems a common sense fact to prevent unwanted effects other than brief incapacitation. “Shooting to incapacitate” when referring to guns and lethal force, however, means aiming for the face and chest area (Streett, personal communication, 2013). A brief ECD shock to the arms, legs, or back is much less commonly lethal than a gunshot to the face or chest. Finally, Corporal Streett stated that Tasers were so effective because, while someone is in the process of being tased, it is extremely painful. He views this as positive, because most assailants only need a Taser warning to comply with the officers, and no real force is needed. ECD’s are an effective choice because they have less chance of fatalities or injuries, and are a daunting option to criminals to strongly urge them to respond without…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Narrowing the judges’ focus to only punishment and retribution would not serve the initial purpose of having a justice system at all. Certain members of the public may believe the opposite. These individuals believe that judges in our court system are too lenient on sentencing the accused. However, how knowledgeable are these individuals in the Australian justice system? In contrast to the expertise judges and Australian judicial workers have learnt through years of experience, must the public’s contradicting, non-expertise opinion determine the outcome of individuals accused of crime? Certainly, the law must take into account the values and expectations of the community. However, it is fundamental to our system of justice that there is the right of an offender to a fair trial must exist – this is protected in our current sentencing system. Under Section 5 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), a court should consider a number of objectives to determine the appropriate sentence; punishment, deterrence, denouncement, rehabilitation and protection. Sentencing legislation also specifies matters that courts must take into account when passing sentence, such as mitigating factors and the offender’s personal circumstances.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is one of the major effects of mandatory minimum sentencing in that it limits judicial discretion of the most serious crimes in the criminal justice system. What is problematic in this instance is that without variation the role of judges, their highly respected reasoning in balancing competing values, and understanding of the law is compromised because of these restrictions in sentencing. Has this discretion completely vanished? Athar Malik explains that as a result, “what little discretion remains in the hands of the judge, now gives the Crown an inordinate amount of power.” Mandatory minimum sentencing may also increase the pressure to plead guilty, whereby the discretion wielded by the Crown is “hidden from public view” which in turn may reduce accountability and allow systemic discrimination to be perpetuated. Hence, mandatory minimums distort the role of the prosecutor, turning him from an advocate into a quasi-judge and this is neither desirable nor appropriate in our judicial system. This is problematic as this limits taking into account varying aggravating and mitigating factors unique to each case. Consequently, with the imposition of mandatory minimum sentencing, judges have become accustomed to imposing prison terms as the norm and with the passage of time there will be fewer judges who will adopt a…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser Overuse

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The use of taser should be permitted to extend that such use is necessary to police officers should have some understanding of the effects that using weapon is likely to have upon a suspect before using the weapon.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Discretionary authority: The right to choose what action to take; permission to act. Each facet of the criminal justice system has its own level of discretionary authority. Whether or not each facet wants to acknowledge it, each facet eventually answers to the public. From a police officer writing a ticket or deciding to pursue a fleeing suspect to the probation/parole officer filing a violation of probation or parole – and the organizations in between – each facet must adhere to the policy and procedures for its own agency.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discretion within the criminal trial process is a very important matter, as the judge or magistrate must exercise appropriate measures in order to reach a just verdict. For example the evidence presented in trial must be approved by the Judge or Magistrate in case the evidence used in court appears inadmissible or prejudicial. The Evidence Act 1995 applies court discretion within the trial process as it allows for the quality of fairness. Without the exercise of impartiality within the trial process the decision made by the jury may alter the final…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Taser Guns Are Bad

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stun guns like Tasers are often preferred by officers simply for their easy use, better user control as well as lesser danger to both the officer and the target. If they are used after a proper warning, that if the target does not calm down, a Taser gun is most likely to be used against him, they could stand a better chance of achieving a safe end…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the years, the issue concerning the use of non lethal force in Policing and the Criminal Justice system has been a very controversial and debated topic. These weapons used by the Police have saved a considerable amount of lives and have proven themselves as a useful tool in making the jobs of the police more effective and efficient. Non lethal weapons are designed to incapacitate people or disable equipment with effects that are only temporary and completely reversible. These weapons are meant to cause no permanent change to the person, whether that should be physically or mentally. The police have these weapons as an alternative to using lethal force, therefore decreasing the likelihood…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our text, discretion is defined as having to decide between two or more courses of action or behavior. Discretion is practiced in all aspects of the criminal justice system, police, corrections, judges and attorneys all have the power and capabilities to exercise discretion. An example of police discretion is a police officer responding to a domestic violence call, the officer can analyze the situation and decide to arrest one or both parties or, attempt to provide them the resources to get help or give a warning. An example of a correctional officer using discretion is, if the correctional officer witnesses an inmate breaking a law or code of the facility and can make the decision to do nothing or follow procedure. Another example of discretion…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Tasers Is Bad

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    David Hambling, a respected free lance writer on technology and military states, “[a] recent study in the American Journal of Public Health looked at 24, 000 cases in which police officers had used force, including Tasers, pepper spray, batons and manual methods . . . the study found that Taser use reduced the overall risk of injury by 65 percent. In other words, restricting Taser use could triple the number of injuries caused in this sort of incident” (1). Misconceptions on the use of Taser led to a comment by a person who goes by the name “the disturber” on CBC news website, he says, “what's wrong with people when they [start] using devices that can pump out over 1500 volts for self defence that's just not cool. [D]oesn't any one remember the guy who got [tasered] 5 times at the air port because he wasn't "co-operating" with the security; wasn't he killed because of the shock? [I] think that they should be banned from use for a less [lethal] item like pepper spray” (#). Pepper sprays can not be used in closed areas because it will effect innocent bystanders, also, as Jim Wilkinson, the Vice President of the site Your Greatest Protection declares, “[pepper spray] works longer than Tasers or stun guns, it will cause coughing and choking, and it burns really bad . . . [s]tun guns work by disabling the nervous and the muscular system but…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    @When it comes picturing the criminal justice and its various administrations most people tend to believe that for the most part it is quite rigid and regulated as every procedure has to be followed down to the letter, but they would be surprised to find out how often formal structures, policies, and preferred practices are undermined by informal rules and group processes. The practice of informal rules and group processes allows criminal justice personnel to exercise more discretion when doing their jobs as some scenarios like minor offenses are not indicative for the need to arrest people and prosecute them. To analyze this in regards to the criminal justice system there are three key pointers that one should understand like why such informal practices exist, how they function in practice, and what variations exist in their application in police, courts, and corrections.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Police Discretion

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Police discretion is the ability to choose a course of action because of broad limits of power. It "refers to the autonomy an officer has in choosing an appropriate course of action" (The Police In America, 113). It "includes authority to decide which of the various means of helping the helpless, maintaining order, and keeping the peace are best suited to particular circumstances" (www.worldandi.com/specialreport/1989/january/Sa15878.htm). The police need to have discretion since it is impossible to record everything on what they are supposed to do and not do. We can also understand that if you could record all the rules and regulations it would be too extensive for an individual to comprehend.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first component of the CJS is law enforcement that would be the police. The police enforce the laws by serving the public and keeping them safe. Police investigate crimes, apprehend offenders, reduce and prevent crimes, maintain public orders, ensure community safety, respond to emergencies, and protects fundamental rights and freedoms of individuals. The courts are the once that conduct fair and impartial trials. They do this by deciding criminal’s eases, ensuring due process, determining guilty or not, upholds the law, requires fairness, and protects rights and freedom to anyone facing…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Police and Corruption

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    people. The police is a government service to all people, but all people do not…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays