Preview

Disparate Treatment Case Study

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Disparate Treatment Case Study
Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act provides two primary theories of recovery for individuals--these are disparate treatment and disparate impact (sometimes labeled adverse impact). This section of the Civil Rights Code forbids job discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. Members of those "protected classes" cannot lawfully be denied employment opportunities merely because they are Native Americans, black, of Vietnamese ancestry, or white, for that matter (Paetzold, 2005, p. 330).

Title VII made obvious, deliberate employment discrimination illegal. It enforced a legal theory of disparate treatment. Disparate treatment exists if an employer gives less favorable treatment to employees
…show more content…
Because perceivers can never know what another person actually thinks, the determination of intent required inferences arising from the other person 's behavior. For example, in the early case of Slack v. Havens, (1975) four Black women claimed that they were illegally discharged because of their race when they refused to perform heavy cleaning duties that were not within their job description. Another coworker, a White woman, was excused from performing these duties. Their supervisor, Pohansky, who had ordered the women to do the heavy work, was known for making statements such as "Colored people should stay in their places" and "Colored folks are hired to clean because they clean better" (pp. 1092-1093). The court noted that these statements reflected ill motives for requiring the Black plaintiffs to perform the heavy cleaning. The statements were taken as "direct evidence" of racial animus, i.e., conscious intent to discriminate on the basis of race. Under the law, "direct evidence" suggests that the commentary from Pohansky was the equivalent of Pohansky telling the women that they were discharged as a result of their being Black. In other words, he was aware of his prejudicial attitudes toward Black persons and consciously treated them differently as a result. The bad intent caused the illegal discrimination to occur, supporting a district court …show more content…
He might still have been acting out of prejudice or stereotypes, known or unknown to him, but he would not have exhibited a conscious intention to discriminate. The legal outcome would not be as straightforward. When the behaviors may reflect an unconscious or ambiguous intent to discriminate, the legal system may not recognize them as constituting illegal discrimination (Krieger,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Discrimination by perception: direct discrimination against someone because others think they have a protected characteristic (even if they don't).…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, it is clear to me how and why the judge was able to include those who were not specificity directed by the company’s actions to be included in the outcome of the ruling. Title VII was put in place to help protect minorities in the workplace and those in search of employment. This Act which was passed in 1964, prohibits discriminations in regards to the process of hiring, firing, and training, promoting and disciple along with the advertisement of open positions. This Act also includes any workplace decisions that are based on an employees or an applicant’s race, gender, national origin, or religion. The Title VII Act goes as far as including hiring, pay, and the terms of employment, available training layoffs and benefits. The Local 28 Steel Metal Workers had their hiring and promotion system worded and set up so that only white males would be interested, accepted and feel comfortable in applying for the apprenticeship position along with the ability to move up the union ladder into the union and journeymen position. The goal of the apprenticeship was to find themselves in the local 28 union. This process was set to up to discourage minority’s (specifically black males) from applying. Thus the sheet metal group local 28 was not only in violation of the Title VII Act but also the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), The court system (attempted) to step in to make the sheet metal workers union of local 28 compliant with the (EEOC) and the Title VII Act without success as eighteen years the steel workers were still not compliant with the courts orders.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Dunlap VS Tennessee Valley Authority, the legal issue that was presented was discrimination, disparate treatment and disparate impact. According to the EEOC, race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features). Color discrimination involves treating someone unfavorably because of skin color complexion. The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination, and when it comes to the case, discrimination was seen in many ways.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unintentional discrimination occurs when a company’s policies uncritically reflect prejudicial stereotypes yet do not involve overt racial prejudices of its managers or executives. Does legislation to verify voter identification fall under the domain of unintentional or intentional discrimination? Explain your views.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Act protects individuals from unfair labor practices such as discrimination with regards to race, sex, or religion. In addition to prohibiting employment discrimination Title VII also prohibits harassment and a hostile work environment. It was the violation of Title VII with regards to sexual harassment that facilitated the legal action of Beth Ann Faragher against her employer the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. Because of the civil rights act, Faragher was able to take the city to court and share what happened to her. Unfortunately all your able to do is take people like this to court and hope for the best. But the city of Boca Raton feels that they did nothing wrong because they 're not the ones who did the offense but they are the ones who re wrote the law in that department.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination of employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin (see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2[31]). Title VII also prohibits discrimination against an individual because of his or her association with another individual of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the outset of the Eighty-eighth Congress various Senators and Representatives submitted a plethora of civil rights bills. Some included comprehensive provisions relating to all areas of civic and economic life where discrimination existed, including private employment; others dealt primarily with equal employment opportunity in both private and public employment. The proposed methods of enforcement ran the gamut—from those providing for a strong administrative agency, like the NLRB, with power to hold hearings and issue cease-and-desist orders enforceable in court, to those providing simply for conciliation and persuasion or merely further study and recommendations.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As well as direct discrimination there is indirect discrimination, this is not always as easy to spot.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prejudice is where an individual forms an opinion on someone else before becoming aware of the relevant factors involved. The word is often used to refer to usually unfair judgments towards people or a person because of gender, social class, age, disability or race/ethnicity. In this case, it refers to a positive or negative assessment of another person based on their social group. Gordon Allport (1954) defined prejudice as a "feeling, favorable or unfavorable, toward a person or thing, prior to, or not based on, actual experience". Social cognition aims to understand social psychological phenomena (such as stereotyping…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people have been treated wrongly for something they have never done, or something they don’t do it under no conditions. This is called prejudice. Prejudice is an opinion made without adequate basis to discriminate people against others from first impression. There are many cases where people being victims of prejudice such as racial discriminations, political views or even general appearance.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Disparate Treatment

    • 4057 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Supreme Court applied Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to law enforcement in 1972. Agencies could be sued for discriminating against qualified women. In some cases, the courts issued consent decrees which forced agencies to hire qualified women. Many law enforcement agencies used height and weight limits to prevent women from meeting the qualifications until the courts struck down this practice in 1977 in Dothard vs.…

    • 4057 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Describe ways in which discrimination may deliberately or inadvertently occur in the work settings.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In contrast, Henry and Tator (2011), found that one should not look at the overt behavior of individuals, but also observe the unintentional behavior that could possibly lead to severe problems or differences. Observing unintentional behavior refers to judging the minority based on appearance or assumptions of the race they are, instead of what they committed as a…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    discrimination is the unlawfully use of harassment or victimisation against another individual ;such as verbal abuse telling inappropriate jokes or excluding an individual because of race ,gender ,religion etc.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays