Preview

Case Analysis: Faragher V. City Of Boca Raton

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
649 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Analysis: Faragher V. City Of Boca Raton
Week Four Learning Team Case Analysis
LAW531

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1998)

In the case Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1998) the Supreme Court made it clear employers are subject to liability for unlawful harassment by supervisors. The Court determined that an employer is always liable for a supervisor 's harassment if it is related to an employment action. The employer can avoid liability by exercising reasonable care to prevent and correct any harassing behavior and if the employee fails to take any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer or to avoid harm (The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1999). Beth Ann Faragher worked for the city of Boca Raton between 1985 and
…show more content…

Even though Faragher and other female employees went to a supervisor to report the violations, he never reported the violations to his superiors, so the city was never aware of any of the violations. This case and others like it have affected businesses awareness over the years. Companies have taken sexual harassment in the workplace as a zero tolerance policy. In the case that the harassment does not affect the company it does affect employees and the work environment which can affect employee productivity. Problems that can arise from sexual harassment in the workplace are if the person being harassed does not report the violation and continues to let the harassment take …show more content…

This Act protects individuals from unfair labor practices such as discrimination with regards to race, sex, or religion. In addition to prohibiting employment discrimination Title VII also prohibits harassment and a hostile work environment. It was the violation of Title VII with regards to sexual harassment that facilitated the legal action of Beth Ann Faragher against her employer the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. Because of the civil rights act, Faragher was able to take the city to court and share what happened to her. Unfortunately all your able to do is take people like this to court and hope for the best. But the city of Boca Raton feels that they did nothing wrong because they 're not the ones who did the offense but they are the ones who re wrote the law in that department. The results of this case provided well-defined accountability for an organizations conduct. The court ruled an employer is responsible for the acts of its supervisors, and employers should be encouraged to prevent harassment. It should also be noted the court ruled that employers can reduce liability exposure by exercising reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any harassing behavior and proving the employee did not take advantage of preventive or corrective opportunities that are afforded (U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights protects man and women. It means that woman and men are protected against any sort of sexual harassment.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Between 1985 and 1990 Beth Ann Faragher worked part time and during the summers as an ocean lifeguard for the Marine Safety Section of the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Boca Raton, Florida. During this time, Faragher's immediate supervisors were Bill Terry, David Silverman, and Robert Gordan. Two years after resigning as a lifeguard in 1990, Beth Ann Faragher brought an action against the City of Boca Raton, Terry and Silverman alleging the supervisors had created a sexually hostile atmosphere by touching, remarking, and commenting. Faragher asserted that this conduct constituted discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In 1986 the City adopted a sexual harassment policy, however the policy did not reach the Marine Safety Section where Faragher worked. Faragher did not make any formal complaints against…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color, as well as national origin, sex, religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state, government, employment agencies, labor organizations and federal government jobs.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 520 Week 5 Assignment

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Based on the given facts, she was the subject of jokes in her work place as she was being picked on based on her gender. Since she was the only woman in her department, the male employees subject her to cruel and mean jokes on several occasion when other workers placed a sign on a truck that stated "Hardhat Required/Bra Optional”. This is clearly an illustration that she is working in a hostile environment since the repeated jokes made on her gender has created an intimidating place of work. The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is applicable to Pollard where the Supreme Court ruled that hostile work environment sex discrimination is an actionable wrong under Title VII. The fact that the Vice President of the bank made sexual advances against complainant created a hostile work environment and is a form of a sexual harassment covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The severe and pervasive conduct of the vice president who repeated sexually abused on the victim in exchange for sexual favors at the office qualify the acts as punishable under Title VII. Here, the acts of the Teddy’s workers against Pollard constitute Hostile Work Environment (HWE) sexual harassment through the vulgar sexual jokes and…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    | Dear Mr. Moore, After reviewing this case, I can state that Teddy’s Supplies is definitely liable for the workplace and sexual harassment against Virginia Pollard. According to the facts, it’s indicated that Ms. Pollard (plaintiff) was placed in a ‘hostile’ environment and Mr. Steve King was her supervisor. Although it is not illegal for 1 woman to work with a group of men, it should be carefully determined by the employer if the environment is suitable for males and females to work together. In this case, it was not a good idea for 1 woman to work with male associates. • Workplace environment can by justified by 7 ways: race, gender, national origin, religious, color, age and disability. In this case, Pollard was constantly being harassed by her male colleagues. They played pranks on her by locking her drawers shut, filling the guard shack with trash, locking her out of the guard shack and therefore she was not able to perform her job duty since she was responsible for watching warehouse inventory. Also, Ms. Pollard was put into unnecessary risk of harm when a coworker backed a forklift up to the guard shack and it backfire into her ear. Ms. Pollard could have sustained injuries if the forklift had hit her because it weighted 3 tons and it could have easily injured her eardrums because it is very loud.…

    • 2218 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Scalia in his concurring opinion of the case Meritor Savings Bank v.Vinson (1986) discusses the standard required to classify a “ hostile work environment.” He states that a “ hostile work environment, ” will be made up of “ an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive (205). The classification of a workplace as a “ hostile work environment,” is a very difficult task considering classifying a firm as a “ hostile work environment,” could severely ruin their reputation and their income. Such label should not emerge as part of a one time incident, especially if the companies chooses to assess the harassment claims shortly after they are filed. Severity must also fall into consideration when defining a hostile work environment because of how potentially damaging these actions can be. The harsher cases of harassment require harsher punishment for the perpetrator to act as a deterrent. However, if a pattern emerges or the…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Williamson V Houston

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Principle of Law: A supervisor’s knowledge of harassing behavior can be imputed to an organization to show that the organization knew of the harassing behavior and can therefore be held liable for failing to stop the behavior. 7. Analysis: This case addresses whether an organization can be held liable for things that an employee (specifically, a supervisor) knows or does. In this specific case, the issue was a supervisor’s knowledge of sexual harassment of an employee. Presumably, however, the supervisor’s knowledge could be of any number of troubling issues regarding employees from negligence, to theft, to drunk driving. The Appeals Court in this case did not focus on the clearly disturbing behavior of the harasser. Instead, they focused on the defendant’s (the city’s) claim that they could not be held liable because knowledge of the harassing behavior on the part of the officer’s supervisor did not constitute knowledge on the part of the city. The court dismissed this claim. One of the issues discussed at length by the court had to do with the rank of the supervisor who had knowledge of the harassing behavior. The city claimed that the supervisor, Sgt. Bozeman, was not considered “upper management” by the department. The court cited another decision from the 7th Circuit (Young v Bayer Corp., 123 F.3d 672, 673-75, 1997) which stated that the labels attached to different levels or organizational hierarchy were not important; rather, the important consideration is to…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Also, in sexual harassment cases, an organization can be held liable for sexual harassment actions by its managers, employees, and even customers…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Meritor Sav

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (b) The District Court's findings were insufficient to dispose of respondent's "hostile environment" claim. The District Court apparently erroneously believed that a sexual harassment claim will not lie absent an economic effect on the complainant's employment, and erroneously focused on the "voluntariness" of respondent's participation in the claimed sexual episodes. The correct inquiry is whether respondent by her conduct indicated that the alleged sexual advances were unwelcome, not whether her participation in them was voluntary. Pp. 477 U. S. 67-68.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Faragher V. Helenrth Case

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. A) “an employer is liable if it knew or should have known of the misconduct, unless it can show that it took immediate and appropriate corrective action” (EEOC, 1999). B) “An employer is subject to vicarious liability for unlawful harassment if the harassment was committed by “a supervisor with immediate (or successively higher) authority over the employee” (EEOC, 1999). C) “If an employer cannot prove that it discharged its duty of reasonable care and that the employee unreasonably failed to avoid the harm, the employer will be liable” (EEOC, 1999).…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Until 1990, no female firefighters had ever served in the City of Providence Fire Department. In January, 1992, O'Rourke and six other women who had passed a written examination were admitted to the City's firefighter six-month training program, along with 77 male trainees. All through the fire academy, as well as her first several years working as a fire fighter, O’Rourke was slandered and sexually harassed. On July 10, 1995, O'Rourke filed a discrimination charge with the Rhode Island Commission of Human Rights and with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received notice of right to sue. O'Rourke also filed a federal court complaint against the City on June 30, 1995, and an amended complaint on July 17, 1995. O'Rourke introduced evidence of harassment spanning the entire duration of her employment at the fire department from 1992 to 1994 including her time spent in training in 1992, the period in which she worked in the Chief's office later that year, her year-long stay at Engine 5 in 1993, and finally, her seven months at Engine 13 in 1994.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roberts, B. S., & Mann, R. A. (n.d.). Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Primer. Retrieved July 2013, from http://www3.uakron.edu/lawrev/robert1.html…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    There are many aspects to human resources, one of which is handling harassment or discrimination claims which come in various forms. Such cases must be handled delicately and promptly, this way the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is not involved and the case in handled internally rather than externally. According to the U.S. Department of State, (Discriminatory Harassment Policy), “Employees must not harass anyone because of race, color, gender, national origin, religion, physical or mental disability, sexual orientation, or because the person is 40 years old or older”. Many companies have a zero tolerance when it comes to discrimination or harassment. Discrimination or harassment can have many faces and can vary from minor to severe, if sever enough it can lead to a lawsuit, costing a business several thousand dollars, if not more. Various forms of discrimination will be covered, including a current bill pending with Congress to help deter discrimination.…

    • 4261 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gm520 You Decide

    • 2973 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Two recent Supreme Court cases have set forth a new test for determining when an employer is vicariously liable for a hostile work environment created by a supervisor. In Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, and Faragher v. Boca Raton, the Supreme Court held that “[a]n employer is subject to vicarious liability to a victimized employee for an actionable hostile…

    • 2973 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    law class

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Similarly, Courts of Appeals in sexual harassment cases have properly drawn on standards developed in cases involving racial harassment. See, e.g., Carrero v. New York City Housing Auth., 890 F.2d 569, 577 (CA2 1989) (citing Lopez v. S. B. Thomas, Inc., 831 F.2d 1184, 1189 (CA2 1987), a case of racial harassment, for the proposition that incidents of environmental sexual harassment “must be more than episodic; they must be sufficiently continuous and concerted in order to be deemed pervasive”). Although racial and sexual harassment will often take different forms, and standards my not be entirely interchangeable, we think there is good sense in seeking generally to harmonize the standards of what amounts to actionable harassment.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays