Preview

Do Judges Make Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
575 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Judges Make Law
A judge-made law is a law rooted in a judiciary decision, not an act of legislation made by lawmakers or a regulation created by a government agency with the legal authority to do so. The collective body of judge-made laws in a nation is also known as case law. Many nations allow judges to set legal precedents when making high court decisions, adding to the body of law in a nation and providing new interpretation of existing laws.

Lower courts do not have the authority to make judge-made law. Only judges operating in appellate and other high courts are able to set legal precedents by either changing the way the courts interpret a law, or offering a new interpretation that expands an existing law. Judges cannot invent laws out of whole cloth; they must be able to provide clear legal rationales for their decisions, with supporting information in the form of decisions in single cases.

After a judge-made law is created, other courts are bound to uphold the law, or to support challenges to it. As other courts abide by the law, they reinforce it and create a body of case law to support the original judge's interpretation of a legal situation. If a challenge is filed in another court, the other judge can choose to overturn the decision, negating the judge-made law, or uphold it, leaving the law in place.

AdChoices
Brain Training Games
Improve memory and attention with scientific brain games. Free Trial www.lumosity.com
Free TOEFL Practice Tests
Listening, reading, speaking, and writing. Learn your score now. www.testden.com
Ask a Lawyer Online Now
A Lawyer Will Answer in Minutes! Questions Answered Every 9 Seconds. Law.JustAnswer.com/Uk-Law
De Benetti & Co. Law Firm
Italian and International lawyers legal advice & assistance in Italy www.debenettilaw.com
Reducing CO2 through CCS
Find how Carbon Capture and Storage will Reduce CO2 emissions. www.globalccsinstitute.com
Case law provides an important mechanism for allowing the legal system to evolve
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    BAMD 300 Study Guide Midterm 1
    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    BAMD 300 Study Guide Midterm 1

    Common Law: judge made law, an act is passed and court makes a ruling about definitions of act…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Law Unit 23
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Law Unit 23

    Also case made law is when the court of appeal acts on a decision made by a lower court and by doing so establishes it in law. However, the judges can only work within the statute/act which is set by parliament. For example judicial review which is a hearing in front of the judge on…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction to Law - Blw16
    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Introduction to Law - Blw16

    I am of the opinion that judges in Australian courts should make law, within specified boundaries. Through the doctrine of precedent, the decisions that judges make in cases before them, form a body of law known as unenacted or judge-made law. The ratio decidendi or the reasons for the judge’s decision form a binding precedent that will direct the decisions of lower courts in the same hierarchy, and guide other courts (Graw, 2005). This body of law, known as decisional law, makes up a large part of law as it stands. However, there are limits on the ability of judges to create laws. Also there are valid…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420
    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Week1 Busn 420

    The American legal system, a direct descendant of the English legal system, began to develop in 1066 and is always evolving. However, the main principles or the “backbone” of this legal system remains the same. The different sources of American law include the Constitution, state constitutions, statutes, common or “case” law, a body of administrative regulations, and court rules. The most important among these various sources of law, other than Constitutional provisions, is common law. The common law process allows judges to hear cases and make decisions, effectively becoming law, based upon these cases. These case decisions become the common law and others must adhere to this “judge-made” law. In the common law process, the judge’s decision or the “holding” of the case binds future courts and creates precedent.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    paralegal
    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages

    paralegal

    Common law is found in the decisions of the courts rather than statutes; judge- made law…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Benefits of a Liberal Arts Degree in Appellate Court Judges
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Benefits of a Liberal Arts Degree in Appellate Court Judges

    Appellate Court judges are the final stop for most of the federal cases in the United States. They hear cases which come from large areas or regions, often encompassing a large number of cultural variances. Rather than hold trials, appellate court judges review decisions of trial courts for errors of law. Court of appeals decisions, unlike those of the lower federal courts, establish binding precedents. Other federal courts in that circuit must, from that point forward, follow the appeals court 's guidance in similar cases, regardless of whether the trial judge thinks that the case should be decided differently. Therefore, the appellate court holds a clout of immense proportion over a large number of people and their laws.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Studies VCE Unit 2
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Legal Studies VCE Unit 2

    It is law developed through the courts. It is also known as judge-made law and case law.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)
    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Basic Structure of the California Courts
    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Basic Structure of the California Courts

    Some laws are entirely made by the courts, known as common law, and evolve on a case-by-case basis. To help the courts determine the outcome of any case they have many resources available to them: the constitution (both U.S. and California), statutes, regulations, and prior decisions made by them or higher courts (precedent).…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Highcourt
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Highcourt

    The source of law in Australia is coming from two resources which are courts and parliament. Courts enact the judge-made law, also called common law, Parliament lays down statutory law. From s109 of the Cth Constitution law, when there is a contradiction between common law and State legislation, common law “prevails”. Common law is stare decisis, it allows judges apply doctrine of precedent to later cases having similar facts. When interpreting the law, courts makes decisions based on doctrine of precedent, however there are no exact two same cases, decisions contains majorities’ subjectivities. Under common law, the decision made by courts follow the hierarchy from local or Magistrates Court & other courts and tribunals to High Court of Australia. From the hierarchy, it illustrates High court of Australia has power over Supreme Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. In another way, High court of Australia has the ability and authority to overturn or refuse applying the ratio or decision of a lower court which are Supreme Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of the same jurisdiction.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Laws in Today's Society
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Laws in Today's Society

    The three branches of the government are put into play by a system of checks and balances in order to keep each other and the laws that they uphold in check. Even though each law is not fool proof, it is better to have them set into place so that the citizens of the country are still in charge of their government; not the other way around.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Write An Essay On The Legislative Branch
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Write An Essay On The Legislative Branch

    The courts alone have the power to interpret the law, which is called jurisdiction. However, their jurisdictional power is restricted to federal and constitutional laws. When the courts make a decision in cases regarding interpretation of the law, it is called precedent. The lower courts must follow the precedent placed by the Supreme Court. Citizens who wish to have their case reviewed by the Supreme Court must appeal to the Court for a writ of certiorari. Typically the Court will hear the case if four of the nine justices decide that they should. The Supreme Court rarely holds trials; the Court’s duty is to interpret laws and decide how they should be enforced. For example, the Supreme Court ruled to legalize same-sex marriage nationwide in their landmark Obergefell v. Hodges case after studying the Fourteenth…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Judges Make Discretionary Decisions
    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Judges Make Discretionary Decisions

    Judges have to make many discretionary decisions while they are on the bench. This is due to the fact that the law, no matter how well it is written, cannot anticipate every circumstance and eventuality that may be subject to that law. As a result, Judges are charged with making rational decisions in regards to the cases that don’t adequately fit the ramifications of the law. Most of the decisions that are made by Judges are independent of official guidelines and vary from Judge to Judge. This is due to the fact that when someone is charged with making a rational choice there are three tiers that have to be met: the decision maker must have a certain goal that they want to obtain from the decision, they must have alternative options other than the decision that they make and lastly they must have…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do Judges Make Laws?
    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Do Judges Make Laws?

    The rules of precedent themselves are judge made, except where a statute has intervened. Occasionally, judges have to decide on a case where there is no previous legal decision or law for the judge to use. This leads to judges technically making law through original precedent. The doctrine of Precedent is the process whereby judges of a lower court are bound to follow a decision on a point already made by a judge in a higher court. It is based on the maxim “stare decisis” which means stand by what has been decided. To satisfy the conditions in the doctrine, the previous point must have been the “Ratio decidendi” (reasons for deciding). The previous court must have been at a higher level than the present or at the same level. The rest of the decisions are “obiter dicta” (things said by the way) not strictly binding but merely persuasive. Though the rules of precedent are applied rigidly and don’t appear to allow scope for creativity, there are ways in which the doctrine of precedent can be avoided, thus allowing judges to create new law.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do Judges Make Law
    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do Judges Make Law

    But every lawyer knows that judges make law — it's their job. In fact, law students learn in the first semester that almost all tort law (governing accidental injuries), contract law and property law are made by judges. Legislatures did not create these rules; judges did, and they continue to do so when they revise the rules over time.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics