Preview

Do Not Resuscitate: Moral and Ethical Dilemma

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1111 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Not Resuscitate: Moral and Ethical Dilemma
Annette Morris
Mark Mills
English Comp 2
November 29, 2010
Do Not Resuscitate: Moral and Ethical Dilemma
Who has the right to take one 's life from them? The Supreme Court says that no man shall take the life of another man without punishment. The Bible says, "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13), yet humans still kill their own kind. How is DNR different? Wikipedia’s definition of DNR or Do Not Resuscitate is “A do not resuscitate document, often called a living will, is a binding legal document that states resuscitation should not be attempted if a person suffers cardiac or respiratory arrest. Abbreviated DNR, such an order may be instituted on the basis of an advance directive from a person, or from someone entitled to make decisions on their behalf, such as a health care proxy.”
The state of Montana tried and convicted Dr. Kevorkian of murder just because he helped sad, tired and suffering patients end all of their pain, by killing them. Is this murder? I believe it is; Dr. Kevorkian killed his victims. He had their permission, but nonetheless, he ended their lives. DNR is different. Why should we have to stay alive or suffer? There comes a time when medical technology is just impending in the grand scheme of life. What 's wrong with death? What are we so afraid of? Why can 't we treat death with a certain amount of humanity, dignity, and decency? Whether the patient believes in an afterlife or not, death is a part of life.
In Barbara Huttman’s essay "A Crime of Compassion" she addresses these points and this very controversial question: When is it lawful and moral to take the life of another person? Her patient Mac had cancer, although he and his family wanted a DNR, during 1983 only the doctor could sign a code status. The doctor refused to sign one for Mac. Huttman said that she resuscitated Mac "52 times in just one month." Is it fair to make someone suffer through pain day in and day out, just waiting to die? Huttman disobeyed hospital



Cited: The Holy Bible. Oxford University Press, Inc. 1945. Print. Huttman, Barbara, “A Crime of Compassion” taken from 75 Readings an Anthology. 9th edition. 1983 print. Kastenbaum, Robert. “On Our Way: The Final Passage Through Life and Death. Los Angeles.” University of California Press, 2004. Print. Cebuhar, Jo Kline. “Last Things First, Just in Case: The Practical Guide to Living Wills and Durable Powers of Attorney for Health Care.” Iowa: Murphy Publishing, LLC, 2006. Print. Post, Linda F., Blustein, J., Dubler, Nancy N. “Handbook for Health Care Ethics Committees.” Baltimore, Maryland: JHU Press, 2007. Print. “Do Not Resuscitate.” Wikipedia. Web. November 22, 2010.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian, Dr. Death, believed he was ethically right by assisting terminally ill people to end their life by prescribing and "pushing" life taking drugs. Dr. Kevorkian argued that by assisting these people with their suicide, the final outcome would end their pain and suffering and the patient has that right through the principle of Autonomy. As cited in Scholarly literature Dr. Kevorkian was only ½ correct. The theory is "Practitioners are considered to be acting ethically in their primary intention of relieving pain, regardless of secondary result" (Pierce, 1999). Therefore that is partly where Dr. Kervorkian lost his bid for being ethically right. He was prescribing the drugs for the sole intent and purpose to end the life of the patient. Secondly was the fact that he went from just prescribing the drugs for pain and comforting the patient while they administered them to themselves, to actually administering the lethal doses his self with the secondary results to become the primary intentions.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The ending of one’s life, terminally ill or not, should not be done purposely by another man’s hands. If such procedures were considered acceptable, every ill person with no will to continue living would try to find ailments that deem assisted suicide. Jack Kevorkian, also known as “Dr. Death,” was a lifelong activist for physician-assisted suicide. Kevorkian was said to have assisted in 130 suicides of terminally ill patients during his life and is looked at as a sick and twisted killer to many, but as a brave, respected pathologist to others. To look back on his history and past activity, is extremely bizarre and unusual; there is everything from leaving pathology in the 70’s to make a movie, to advocating for the usage of medical experiments on criminals during execution. Assisted suicide violates the Fourteenth amendment, which prohibits government from depriving a person of life, liberty and property without ensuring fairness. The act is also by a general consensus, seen as morally and ethically taboo. However, if the patients asked Dr. Kevorkian to assist in their suicide, is he deserving of the criminal charges he has landed, or should he be seen as merely a doctor obeying his patients’ wishes? The facts that present themselves show that Dr. Kevorkian’s actions were arguably unjustified.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack Kevorkian

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I think that one of the biggest miscarriages of justice that I witnessed in my lifetime was that of Dr. Jack Kevorkian receiving a 10 to 25 year sentence for wanting to help end the suffering of a helpless human-being. Dubbed "Dr. Death" by the media frenzy that followed the actions of the controversial physician, he received this sentence for helping to end the life of 52 year old Thomas Youk, who was fighting a hopeless battle with Lou Gehrig's disease. Dr. Kevorkian set up his "suicide machine" in order for the person to knowlingly and voluntarily disperse the chemical concoction that would end the suffering of the victim his family. Although Dr. Kevorkian assisted in the death of 35 people, it was the Thomas Youk case that brought national attention and thus the wrath of the criminal justice system of the state of Michigan. Similar to phsycian-suicide is the issue of both voluntary and involuntary active euthanasia. Both of these involve carrying out the death of another human being, who either knowingly or unknowlingly makes that decision. What makes the case of Dr. Kevorkian different is that he met with all of his patients and recorded the fact that they were coherent and able to make their own decision about the ending their life. I am guessing that when the Thomas Youk story aired on 60 Minutes in 1998, it brought national scutiny and a mockery of the laws in the eyes of the Michigan criminal justice system. I wanted to better understand this concept the particulars about this case and what the overwhelming public opinion on the topic was nationally and within the state of Michigan.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Advance directives are common medical documents that assist health care providers in providing care to patients. There are four types of advance directives which are: a Living Will, Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA), Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders (Fremgen, 2009). In this paper, the advance directive called the Living Will will be explained. A Living Will is drafted while a person is still mentally healthy and able to make decisions about their health care. The Living Will expressly details what care that the patient would or would not want in the event of a terminal injury or illness where they would not be able to express their wishes. Each and every person should have an advance Directive or Living Will to take the burden off of their family to make decisions regarding their life. Life threatening illness is an emotional time and can cause great pain if someone is not ready to let go.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Weeds vs. Flowers

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian is a firm believer in physician-assisted suicide, giving his patients the dignity and respect that they deserved in making this last major decision for their life and how they wanted to end it. His patients thought of him as a hero because he aided them in their major time of need, and they felt very comfortable with him because they didn’t have to worry about feeling awkward when bringing up this method of help. The family members of Kevorkian’s patients were ultimately happy that he provided such ease to their loved ones, and showed nothing but care and respect for those individuals. This decision is a heavy burden to bear because of the feelings that the majority of people feel is wrong and immoral. Dr. Kevorkian was convicted of second degree murder in 1999 because of assistance with euthanizing one of his patients Thomas Youk, who suffered from Lou Gehrig’s disease in 1998. He was provided with financial support by an organization called “The Hemlock Society” for his lawsuit, and they also referred patients to him for their aid in finding a caring physician that would end their suffering.…

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian was the face of the assisted suicide movement in the 1990s, and his practices in assisted suicide and euthanasia are shrouded in controversy. According to (Preface p.1), “He invented a killing machine called the mercitron which incapacitated or debilitated people could use to take their own lives: All they had to do was flip a switch.” He became known as Dr. Death and assisted over 130 people in their deaths from 1990-1998. In attempt to bring attention to the Right to Die movement, Dr. Kevorkian was public about his self-described “mercy killings.” In doing so, he had several murder charges brought against him by the state of Michigan. He was never convinced, until his attempt to ratchet up the debate resulted in him taping…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To the advocates of pro-life and those who support pro-choice, I pose the question of the moral of Physician-assisted suicide. To abort the sick and the old for society is the goal and the purpose of Physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide was originally brought to public attention by Dr. Jack Kevorkian also known as Dr. Death. Dr. Kevorkian was thrust into the limelight after violating the Hippocratic Oath and assisting in the suicide of a Janet Adkins, an Alzheimer’s patient, with his homemade suicide machine, built from junkyard scraps. In recent years, Physician assisted suicide has become a feasible solution to individuals with terminal diseases or the elderly, but it that a good…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rapid and dramatic developments in medicine and technology have given us the power to save more lives than was ever possible in the past. Medicine has put at our disposal the means to cure or to reduce the suffering of people afflicted with diseases that were once fatal or painful. At the same time, however, medical technology has given us the power to sustain the lives (or, some would say, prolong the deaths) of patients whose physical and mental capabilities cannot be restored, whose degenerating conditions cannot be reversed, and whose pain cannot be eliminated. As medicine struggles to pull more and more people away from the edge of death, the plea that tortured, deteriorated lives be mercifully ended grows louder and more frequent. Californians are now being asked to support an initiative, entitled the Humane and Dignified Death Act, that would allow a physician to end the life of a terminally ill patient upon the request of the patient, pursuant to properly executed legal documents. Under present law, suicide is not a crime, but assisting in suicide is. Whether or not we as a society should pass laws sanctioning "assisted suicide" has generated intense moral controversy.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial ethical dilemma that is receiving a lot of press in society recently. The issue is an emotional debate whether a terminally ill or disabled person has the right to end their existence with the support of their physician, which affects not just the patient, but their families and health care providers. Physician assisted suicide has legal ramifications as well. One argument in favor of Physician assisted suicide alludes to that the patient has the right to end their life with dignity. An opposing argument is if a physician participates in assisted suicide this goes against the “American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Ethics”. A physician and nurse are respected within the community to…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree that the right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid any unnecessary excruciating pain seems as though it should be a basic human right. To have someone go through more suffering than absolutely necessary seems as though it would fall under the description of an inhumane act, and frankly an injustice against the basic human right of bodily autonomy and integrity. Due to these almost undeniable arguments, physician assisted suicide, in many cases, is seen as a basic human right that we need to be granted access to. Activists argue that it is simply an additional choice that we will be able to make, and that it will surely never be pushed onto anybody or used sinisterly (Maynard 2014). Although this claim is something that we cannot be entirely sure of, as I have continued to research the pros and cons behind physician assisted suicide, I have come to the conclusion that in many cases it truly does seem that the legalization of physician assisted suicide is the best option for everyone involved. It is a means to cease any unnecessary suffering that a person may be going though, and provides a sense of comfort for them during a time in their lives where they are not given many choices besides to deal with what they are going through and try to survive. Additionally, with many of the extreme medical advancements of the 20t century, our goals have been clouded by the quest to…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death is an event, dying is a process. Modern medicine today works very hard to help people live longer and avoid that dreaded day when death comes. The healthcare system is prolonging life, but is it always the answer, forcing someone to continue a suffering life. Doctors sometimes unintentionally instill false hope in patients by offering treatment that most likely will not work or benefit the patient. Prolonging life has ethical and moral issues. Death is also a very taboo topic in our culture and should not be discussed or accepted. The doctors and pharmaceutical companies that are prolonging life do not fully understand the damage they are causing to society surrounding death.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial topics in society is physician-assisted suicide. The debate is endless in regards to human suffering. There is a solid argument in favor of physician-assisted suicide in terminally ill patients, who are experiencing unbearable pain and have little time left. Research shows that one who is terminally ill and going through excruciating pain has the right to make decisions regarding free choice and human dignity to end one’s life in a merciful way. Research on opposing arguments will show that physician-assisted suicide has negative psychological effects on the doctor along with being morally wrong to take the precious gift of life. Public attitude, education, perception, religious beliefs, family values, and freedom of choice all combine to make the decision of whether physician-assisted suicide is right or wrong, is murder or not murder, one that will truly never be clearly defined. This writer believes that all human beings have the right to be safe and free of pain when one is suffering from a terminal illness.…

    • 3192 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is a highly controversial bioethical issue that has been increasingly debated in recent years. Advocates of physician assisted suicide argue that it champions patient autonomy and reduces suffering while opposers suggest the benefits outweigh the risks and that there are other acceptable alternatives to the practice. This paper attempts to demonstrate the permissibility of physician assisted suicide as a regulated, medically reliable end-of-life option that can help end the suffering of individuals struggling with terminal illnesses. This will be achieved while still providing a comprehensive view of both opponents’ and supporters’ perspectives on the issue, specifically regarding the nature of the death that comes…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For an unaffected, healthy individual, with death painted as a villain by his subconscious, it is easy to raise a gavel against the legalization of assisted suicide. It is easy for this individual to deny the right to end one’s suffering by citing a variety of aged, insignificant arguments like ancient oaths and biased religious teachings, all in defense of the instinct of his subconscious. However, the debate over assisted suicide is greater than this, and must be considered much more deliberately and meticulously. When one considers justice, autonomy, compassion, and all other necessary factors in the modern assisted suicide debate, it is clear that the practice of physician-assisted suicide is merciful and necessary, and must be a provided right to suffering individuals near the…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept and practice of physician assisted suicide is a highly debated topic in today’s news. People often question the morals of the physicians who practice euthanasia and there are some who believe that they should not even be considered doctors. Euthanasia is the ending of someone's life through a doctor's help and is still illegal in most countries. One of the most well known advocates for the practice of euthanasia is Jack Kevorkian, who has also been referred to as Dr. Death. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder, however his practice gained a lot of support from the publicity of his trials. Although he is responsible for over 130 deaths, Kevorkian is a hero in today’s standards because of his involvement in the practice…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays