Do People Who Put Ourselves At Risk
Do People Who Put Themselves At Risk Have The Right To Rescue Services?
What if someone was about to fall off of a huge building, or natural structure? What would your first action in mind be? To save them right, but why do people begin taking risks if they know this could happen and they are risking not only their life but many other lives are taking the risk to save you. Why do you have the right to rescue services if you take a risk that can be fatal for more than one person? People may die trying to save your life. This is why I believe people who take risks should not have rights of rescue services.
First of all, people who take risks, not only end up losing their own lives but sometimes take down many people with them. For example, …show more content…
Moreau states in his article Why Everest, “A person cannot survive in this zone for more than two days because of lack of oxygen and extreme temperatures.” (lines 31-32). Another case of this is stated in Alexa Vaughn’s newspaper article Ranger Killed During Rescue of Climbers on Mount Rainier, “... he fell down the mountain’s northeast side from the 13,700-foot level,” (Line 12). Why do people risk their own life, or other rescue service people’s lives in such bad conditions? Freezing temperatures, rough summits, treacherous gorges are just a couple bad places or …show more content…
That is true but why do they even take these types of risks. Helping people is the right thing to do, but you can’t risk your entire life to help someone who took a risk. People who say this are wrong because, would you risk your life to save someone who is about to fall off a mountain. That would be the right thing to do and not cruel, but face it saving yourself is just as, or even more important than who deliberately took a life-threatening risk. Saving yourself is more important, or shares the same importance as saving someone who is a risk
What if someone was about to fall off of a huge building, or natural structure? What would your first action in mind be? To save them right, but why do people begin taking risks if they know this could happen and they are risking not only their life but many other lives are taking the risk to save you. Why do you have the right to rescue services if you take a risk that can be fatal for more than one person? People may die trying to save your life. This is why I believe people who take risks should not have rights of rescue services.
First of all, people who take risks, not only end up losing their own lives but sometimes take down many people with them. For example, …show more content…
Moreau states in his article Why Everest, “A person cannot survive in this zone for more than two days because of lack of oxygen and extreme temperatures.” (lines 31-32). Another case of this is stated in Alexa Vaughn’s newspaper article Ranger Killed During Rescue of Climbers on Mount Rainier, “... he fell down the mountain’s northeast side from the 13,700-foot level,” (Line 12). Why do people risk their own life, or other rescue service people’s lives in such bad conditions? Freezing temperatures, rough summits, treacherous gorges are just a couple bad places or …show more content…
That is true but why do they even take these types of risks. Helping people is the right thing to do, but you can’t risk your entire life to help someone who took a risk. People who say this are wrong because, would you risk your life to save someone who is about to fall off a mountain. That would be the right thing to do and not cruel, but face it saving yourself is just as, or even more important than who deliberately took a life-threatening risk. Saving yourself is more important, or shares the same importance as saving someone who is a risk