Do you agree with Gever Tulley that the increasing safety regulations for children are limiting children

Do you agree with Gever Tulley that the increasing safety regulations for children are limiting children’s opportunities to interact with the world around them? Why or why not?
I agree with Gever Tulley that increasing safety regulations for children are limiting children’s opportunities to interact with the world around them because children will explore anything. They will find a way to do whatever they want to do. If you restrict the child from everything, how they are supposed to learn from their mistakes, also kids when they eventually grow up they won’t know what’s right or wrong because they were restricted to explore and experiment when they were smaller.
What can children learn from playing with fire?
From playing with fire, children can learn the basic principles of fire. They can learn when do deal with fire and when not to they will know the safety rules when dealing with fire
Which of the “dangerous things” do you think would most beneficial for children? I think throwing a spear would be the most beneficial for children because, when throwing things has been shown to the whole system and that applies to your brain. This helps it visual acuity 3D understanding, structural problem and solving and as well, physical skills.

What role do you think parents should play in helping their children explore the world? How can parents protect their children and let them explore?
The role that I think parents should play in helping their children explore around the world is being very encouraging. A child is not going to learn if they don’t go off by themselves. They should encourage the child to pursue their dreams. A parent is there to teach the child to be independent. For example if you don’t teach your child your child will never learn so if you teach your kids to follow their dreams and what they believe in they will succeed in my opinion