able to create a reader which is more connected to the story and remains on the edge…
The short Essay, An Experiment in Criticism, by C.S. Lewis brings to light many new perspectives to how people read and experience literature. Throughout the essay Lewis works to give the message that; how good a book is doesn’t depend on the quality of writing but on the reader. He begins by defining two types of readers- the “literary” and the “non-literary”- which he uses through the rest of his essay to categorize different traits for treating literature.…
The extent of a balanced interpretation of Trotsky within history varies throughout the differing aspects of his life and personality, however it can be considered that overall, it offers a balanced interpretation to a limited extent. His position as a Marxist offers a more unbalanced interpretation, as perspectives vary from stating that he was a practical Marxist idealist to perceiving him as a bloodthirsty terrorist. Similarly, interpretations of Trotsky appear unbalanced when considering his role as a propagandist through his oratorical skills and writing, which allowed for him to be viewed as a great Bolshevik figurehead, whilst Soviet Realism effectively eliminated his significance within history, and vilified him. Within his role as Commissar for War, however, offers a more balanced opinion as it is widely regarded both during his time and in more contemporary times that he was incredibly fit for the role, however there are still interpretations that vary from the romanticised notion of Trotsky as War Commissar. Therefore it can be considered that when considering different aspects of his life, the extent of a balanced interpretation varies, however that overall history offers a limited balanced interpretation of Trotsky, as within each segment of his life, there is no real mutual consensus, as differing contexts and agendas behind documenting history aim to colour Trotsky in different ways. Historiography allows for these differing opinions to be recognised as due to the different contexts and agendas behind historians for documenting Trotsky’s history, as history is a humanised process and thus flaws can be evident within the differing interpretations of Trotsky’s character.…
In every story the characters are the ones who captivate a reader. In Zusak’s novel “The book thief” he makes an effort to create characters with enough personality that they didn’t even need to be described. There are many attitudes and reactions that characters have trough out the book, and they give away who they really are. The characters seem so real that at a certain point, the reader could forget the characters are not real. One example of that “reality confusion” is how Death portraits himself as a human.…
It is perceived throughout literature that characters within a novel are solely prompted by personal interests. Yet, we learn that they are sometimes driven throughout the work ascertaining a purpose larger than themselves. Whether it is an author’s use of literary elements (such as dialogue, characterization, or conflict) or even in their craft alone, it is inevitable in the two classic works: The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck and The Crucible by Arthur Miller. In The Grapes of Wrath, we discover an unavoidable change in the character Rose of Sharon. When we are first introduced to Rose of Sharon, she is exceedingly dependent on her husband and primarily concerned about the well-being of her child. Yet as the novel progresses, Steinbeck innovates Rose of Sharon into a seemingly new character. This is also present with The Crucible’s John Proctor. He begins absent-minded, careless, and only uneasy about keeping his affairs with Abigail Williams silent. However, Arthur Miller worked to evolve Proctor’s character with his use of conflict, irony, and a creative mind-set. Both characters, Rose of Sharon and John Proctor, progress into nearly entirely new people all from the endeavor of the authors. The focus though, is how the authors are able to do it.…
Books can cast a strange spell over you. It’s the intimacy of being let into such details of a character’s feelings and being that draws you to read The fluency of the writing and the drama, heroism, and intrigue exhibited by the characters can almost be too much for a person. The pure power of literature sometimes wont allow you to set the book aside and leave the characters life. The attraction and attachment of humans to fictional characters through reading is seen in the poem “The Reader” by Richard Wilbur and an excerpt from the short story “A General in the Library” by Italo Calvino.…
These authors use characterization as a literary element. For example in the story Nethergrave, Jeremy’s parent’s characterizations have abandoned and neglected Jeremy emotionally for the majority of his life. It is different for his friends, as for Jeremy’s online friends it is insecure and worried about how others view them, as Jeremy appears to be. The guys do not show the whole truths about who they really are, they are all thinking that is the only way that the rest of them will accept them. There are things about each of the people in the group that Jeremy does not know of. Characterization in Sound of Thunder was Eckels nervousness, it shows this by many of his actions for example, Ray Bradbury writes “Eckels swayed on the padded seat, his face pale, his jaw stiff. He felt the trembling in his arms, and he looked down and found his hands tight on the new rifle.” (70) Once the time machine returns with Eckels and some employees, things seem to be very different to him. Eckels can’t read the sign and when he ask’s a strange man who won the presidential election, the man tells Eckels that a another candidate is in office. The man says “You joking? You know very well. Deutscher, of course!”(460) This candidate was the one who was President when he left. Those are a couple ways both authors use characterization in their…
Bradbury describes books as "revealing the pores in life... but people want only wax moon faces, pore less, hairless, expressionless" (Bradbury). Because of the way that society has developed, people no longer appreciate being different, in fact, they actively shy away from anything that does not meet their definition of perfect. Perfection has all that they have been exposed to, and naturally it is all that the masses desire. Books teach people to appreciate various differences that appear in their lives everyday. Books reveal how life is not perfect and that the differences between people are what allow exceptional individuals to succeed in life. Unfortunately, because of the conditioning that they have had, they fail to see how differences can lead to something positive. Today, pressure for men to conform to the standard forms of male masculinity have caused sever depression in men throughout various societies (Rice, et al.). Society today has been conditioned in a similar manner as the society within the novel. Today, people expect a certain type of image or personality, but not everyone is capable or willing to conform to this preset standard. These standards have been set by perceptions of the perfect person that are set by the media, similar to how the masses in Fahrenheit 451 were conditioned to expect nothing less than perfection. Through reading, however, people can be exposed to different types of characters that are less than perfect, but still natural and…
4. Does the author expect the reader to make an emotional connection to the story? Explain your answer.…
“Anyone who [is not] confused really [does not] understand the situation,”(Edward R. Murrow). This quote displays what most readers go through when reading a book. It also displays why the reader should explore more so they understand what is happening. Just think for a second if something was so easily viewed, but it was still confusing because the reader is not sure whether a character is good or evil? Well, in this book The Golden Compass that is what it does. You can thank Philip Pullman later. In The Golden Compass, Pullman’s use of rhetorical devices such as themes, motifs, and figurative language helps create the text’s serious tone.…
After reading the article, “Reading Like a Writer”, it made me aware of my reading behaviors. Just like the text, I read to try to understand what the author is attempting to portray. However, what I am doing differently is only reading for information. What the text suggests that readers do is to ask yourself why the author used that method of writing, whether it's persuasive, ironic, or dramatic. Additionally, the author recommends that you discover who the intended audience is; this will benefit you because it makes you understand why the author used this style of writing.…
A reader response criticism complies with my beliefs of Literature, in that everyone who reads a book comes from a figuratively different place than any other reader. Since everyone is a unique individual, the impressions, and meanings of passages are to be interpreted by these readers in their own unique and individual…
This common satisfaction in turn “contributes to the group’s solidarity” (Rehberg Sedo 67). Rehberg Sedo acknowledges that women relate themselves to the text, which leads to the creation of new identities as they are able to “map their developing self-identities”(67) through the fictional and real world. Women’s identity traits allow individuals to escape from undesired aspects of life and “create different ways of being in their world”(Rehberg Sedo 68). Striphas recognizes that women embrace this new world through the influence of novels in order “to create spaces and thus remove themselves both symbolically and practically from their domestic, female role-assigned duties"(302). Women, often living in a patriarchal society, enjoy reading because it allows them to escape from their everyday errands, however “on the contrary [reading] also enable[s] book readers to interrogate their everyday lives as women via characters and events in the books”(309). Davis agrees with Striphas’ notion of readers relating their lives to novels and further explains that “sympathetic reading experiences can play an important role in larger chain of events”(412). Reading allows readers to imagine themselves as the main character and understand the conditions the character is facing. This may lead to a shift in an individual’s perspective of…
Alexander Isayevich Solzhenitsyn once said that, “Literature transmits incontrovertible condensed experience… generation to generation. In this way literature becomes the living memory of a nation.” In saying this he is verbalizing one of the fundamental functions of literature, to have the author’s thoughts and emotions preserved for generations to come. As the author writes the reader can essentially put himself in the position of not only the author but of the characters as well. Part of the Brain’s job is to make connections, so in short the reader tends to put himself/herself in the place of, or even parallels their own experiences to the characters and author of the text being ingested. Literature provides the writer with a place where…
Books are precious pieces that improve one’s knowledge and help define one’s personality by relating themselves to characters within the text. As Vladimir Nabokov said in Good Readers and Good Writers “The reader should identify himself or herself with the hero or heroine.”(Nabokov, 973) I always believed that by reading a book you become one with yourself by somehow feeling all the problems of the characters and become completely absorbed in their world, therefore feeling like you have a purpose as you read.…