An emphasis is placed on the most recent historical examples in the 20th and 21st century. However, it is critical to understand that the roots of Anti-Haitianism were prevalent in the Dominican Republic as far back as the 17th century when French colonization and the creation of sugar plantations for cane sugar became the dominating export with the usage of systematic slavery. Fast-forward beyond the Haitian revolution in 1804 and sugar plantations have consistently represented a consistent symbol of power and control where although slavery may have been abolished, the narrative of relating plantation labor with phenotypically black Haitians has evolved in shaping and continuing to drive ethnoracial stratification. From brutally forced slavery in the 16th century, to the Trujillo dictatorship, and in current day Dominican politics (which we will examine later) sugar can be attributed as one of the most prevalent historical factors responsible for discriminatory practice directed against phenotypically black
An emphasis is placed on the most recent historical examples in the 20th and 21st century. However, it is critical to understand that the roots of Anti-Haitianism were prevalent in the Dominican Republic as far back as the 17th century when French colonization and the creation of sugar plantations for cane sugar became the dominating export with the usage of systematic slavery. Fast-forward beyond the Haitian revolution in 1804 and sugar plantations have consistently represented a consistent symbol of power and control where although slavery may have been abolished, the narrative of relating plantation labor with phenotypically black Haitians has evolved in shaping and continuing to drive ethnoracial stratification. From brutally forced slavery in the 16th century, to the Trujillo dictatorship, and in current day Dominican politics (which we will examine later) sugar can be attributed as one of the most prevalent historical factors responsible for discriminatory practice directed against phenotypically black