Dormitory Residents Reduce Electricity Consumption When Exposed to Real-Time Visual
Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives
John E. Petersen, Vladislav Shunturov, Kathryn Janda,
Gavin Platt and Kate Weinberger
Oberlin College, Lewis Center for Environmental Studies, Oberlin, Ohio, USA
Abstract
Purpose – In residential buildings, personal choices influence electricity and water consumption.
Prior studies indicate that information feedback can stimulate resource conservation. College dormitories provide an excellent venue for controlled study of the effects of feedback. The goal of this study is to assess how different resolutions of socio-technical feedback, combined with incentives, encourage students to conserve resources.
Design/methodology/approach – An automated data monitoring system was developed that provided dormitory residents with real-time web-based feedback on energy and water use in two “high resolution” dormitories. In contrast, utility meters were manually read for 20 “low-resolution” dormitories, and data were provided to residents once per week. For both groups, resource use was monitored during a baseline period and during a two week “dorm energy competition” during which feedback, education and conservation incentives were provided.
Findings – Overall, the introduction of feedback, education and incentives resulted in a 32 percent reduction in electricity use (amounting to savings of 68,300 kWh, $5,107 and 148,000 lbs of CO22
) but only a 3 percent reduction in water use. Dormitories that received high resolution feedback were more effective at conservation, reducing their electricity consumption by 55 percent compared to 31 percent for low resolution dormitories. In a post-competition survey, students reported that they would continue conservation practices developed during the competition and that they would view web-based real-time data even in the absence of competition.
Practical implications – The results of this research provide
John E. Petersen, Vladislav Shunturov, Kathryn Janda,
Gavin Platt and Kate Weinberger
Oberlin College, Lewis Center for Environmental Studies, Oberlin, Ohio, USA
Abstract
Purpose – In residential buildings, personal choices influence electricity and water consumption.
Prior studies indicate that information feedback can stimulate resource conservation. College dormitories provide an excellent venue for controlled study of the effects of feedback. The goal of this study is to assess how different resolutions of socio-technical feedback, combined with incentives, encourage students to conserve resources.
Design/methodology/approach – An automated data monitoring system was developed that provided dormitory residents with real-time web-based feedback on energy and water use in two “high resolution” dormitories. In contrast, utility meters were manually read for 20 “low-resolution” dormitories, and data were provided to residents once per week. For both groups, resource use was monitored during a baseline period and during a two week “dorm energy competition” during which feedback, education and conservation incentives were provided.
Findings – Overall, the introduction of feedback, education and incentives resulted in a 32 percent reduction in electricity use (amounting to savings of 68,300 kWh, $5,107 and 148,000 lbs of CO22
) but only a 3 percent reduction in water use. Dormitories that received high resolution feedback were more effective at conservation, reducing their electricity consumption by 55 percent compared to 31 percent for low resolution dormitories. In a post-competition survey, students reported that they would continue conservation practices developed during the competition and that they would view web-based real-time data even in the absence of competition.
Practical implications – The results of this research provide
References: Brandon, G. and Lewis, A. (1999), “Reducing household energy consumption: a qualitative and quantitative field study”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol Darby, S. (2000), “Making it obvious: designing feedback into energy consumption”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Household Appliances and Evans, G.W. and McCoy, J.M. (1998), “When buildings don’t work: the role of architecture in human health”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol Heede, R. and Swisher, J. (2002), “Oberlin: climate neutral by 2020”, report, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, CO. Janda, K.B., Payne, C., Kunkle, R. and Lutzenhiser, L. (2002), “What organizations did (and didn’t) do: three factors that shaped conservation responses to California’s 2001 ’crisis’”, Human Mayer, S.F. and Frantz, C.M. (2004), “The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Murray, M. and Petersen, J.E. (2004), “Payback in currencies of energy, carbon dioxide and money for a 60 kW photovoltaic array”, Proceedings of the National Solar Energy Roberts, S. and Baker, W. (2003), “Towards effective energy information: improving consumer feedback on energy consumption”, report, Centre for Sustainable Energy, Bristol. Schipper, L. (1989), “Linking lifestyle and energy used: a matter of time?”, Annual Review of Energy, Vol The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2000), The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY. Wilson, A. and Yost, P. (2001), “Buildings and the environment: the numbers”, Environmental Building News, Vol