Preview

Double Jeopardy Claims

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
434 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Double Jeopardy Claims
Native Americans have always had problems in the United States. Over recent years it has gotten better. Problems include: poverty, unemployment, murder, suicide and deportation. After Lara, an Indian who was not a member of the Spirit Lake Tribe, ignored the Tribe’s order excluding him from its reservation, he tried to resist arrest. Resisting the arrest resulted in one of the federal officers getting struck. He later pleded guilty in Tribal Court to the crime of violence to a policeman. The Federal Government then charged him with the federal crime of assaulting a federal officer. Lara claimed that, because key elements of that crime mirrored elements of his tribal crime, he was protected by the Double Jeopardy Clause. The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, …show more content…

His claim was that his prosecution was invalid because the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968. It does not guarantee counsel to an indigent criminal defendant. By proving that claim, it does not show that the source of the tribal prosecution was federal power, which is something Lara must do to win his double jeopardy claim. Like the due process claim, Lara’s argument that the phrase “all Indians” in “inherent power … to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all Indians” violates the Equal Protection Clause.
From the era of Chief Justice John Marshall through the time of Justice Thurgood Marshall, the Supreme Court has struggled to define American Indian tribal sovereignty. Tribal sovereignty includes: military, social and economic difficulties.
My research showed that Native Americans had it worse than most people. They were disrespected and treated very poorly in the 1800’s and 1900’s. Even though it is now 2000 and beyond, people’s attitudes towards them have gotten better, but not by


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th, 2016, because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez, whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico, and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match. Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Martinez-Maldonado were indicted for the trips payment. The charges were violation of the federal bribery statute, conspiracy, and the Travel Act. These charges tied Mr. Martinez-Maldonado’s support of legislation beneficial…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evidence has demonstrated that at the time of unconstitutional interrogation, a search was already in place for the victim, and the body would have inevitably been found. This means had there not be illegal conduct by the police officers, the fairness of the trial would have remained the…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stone v. Powell (1976) was convicted of murder in the state of California. Powell claimed that the search against him was unlawful so the gun found on him should have been inadmissible in court. He tried to file a writ of habeas corpus but a state prisoner is not granted that right since the state provided him with a full and…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Pelican Bay State Prison inmate, Jesse Perez, was recently awarded $25,000 in damages in reference to a case filed against correctional officers that were accused of acting in violation of the prisoner’s First Amendment rights. Perez was identified by officers at another prison as a member of the Mexican Mafia. After he was identified in 2005, Perez was transferred to Pelican Bay’s Security Housing Unit. The lawsuit was filed against the officers who claimed they identified him as a member of the Mexican Mafia. Perez claims that their determination and decision to reassign him was a violation of his rights by way of the constitution.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Escobedo was treated like a guilty man; he was not awarded his rights protected under the 5th and 6th Amendments to the United States Constitution. These amendments require that people arrested are made aware of their right to talk to Illinois lawyers and their right to be tried for the suspected crimes. Escobedo was not awarded these rights when he was questioned for the crime.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The double jeopardy claim can be supported by facts in the sense that Falkowsi had entered a plea which was unconditional in nature on November, 1992.The case on October,1992 which stated that the Government had taken action in the property seizure of the illegal marijuana plantation. The civil case was taken up at Fairbanks. Also on the charge of possession of marijuana a criminal case was lodged Anchorage. So Falkowski was tried on the same case both the times and so this was a case of double jeopardy.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Worcester vs Georgia

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Worcester's attorneys claimed that the Georgia law he violated was unconstitutional because it conflicted with:…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Training Day Violations

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alonzo and Jake pulled over a vehicle after viewing them buy drugs for recreational use. They used violent confrontation and intimidation towards the suspects and citizens, along while they seized they drugs. It triggered the citizens constitutional right but because the drugs were not in plain sight, nor did…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 13, 1963, eight dollars in cash was stolen from a Phoenix, Arizona bank worker, Police suspected and arrested Ernesto Miranda for committing the theft. Eleven days earlier, an 18- year old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case but didn't have any leads as to a suspect. During two hours of questioning Ernesto Miranda on the theft charge, without never being offered a lawyer, he confessed not only to the eight dollars theft, but also to kidnapping and raping an eighteen year old woman eleven days earlier. The police arrested the poor, and mentally disturbed man. This case would become well known in American constitutional studies. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. By confessing to the crime, Miranda was convicted for kidnapping and rape and sentenced to twenty years in prison.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Marshall Trilogy

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the State of Georgia, it was against the State law to preach without a license. Mr. Worcester was arrested and confined in jail were he sued the State of Georgia appealing that Georgia did not have power to inforce activity on Tribal lands. Marshalls Court agreed with Mr. Worcester affirming that the Cherokee Nation is a distinctive community on its own territory and that Georgia could inforce this State law. Again, this decision recognized that the United States Government, not the states have authority over tribes with inherent…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charge 2: Disobeyed the supreme court ruling of Worcester v.s Georgia by allowing Georgia to enforce its unconstitutional laws concerning the Cherokee nation, my people, and myself. These laws annexed my people’s land to the government of Georgia, abolished our democratic government making our elections illegal, and then raffling off our land to whites. As stated in the court ruling by John Marshall “The Cherokee nation, then, is a distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter, but with the assent of the Cherokees themselves, or in conformity with treaties, and with the acts of congress.” President Jackson allowed an illegal genocide by the state of Georgia on my people. "Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it."…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    students lost their cultural identity was because of the policies that the schools used to…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Double Jeopardy

    • 3623 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The word ‘double’ stands for twice and the term "Jeopardy" refers to the "danger" of punishment which is ascribed to any individual brought to trial before a court of competent jurisdiction. It is a procedural safeguard, which bars a second trial then an accused person is either convicted or acquitted after a full-fledged trial by a court of competent jurisdiction1 Procedural matters prior to trial do not constitute jeopardy, and that's why it's said that jeopardy attaches, or may be asserted by the defendant, once a jury has been sworn in, or the first witness takes the stand, in any original prosecution resulting in any acquittal or conviction. Jeopardy also attaches to any plea of guilty (treated the same as conviction) even if later withdrawn. Jeopardy does not attach to any proceedings resulting in nolle prosequi, mistrial, hung jury, or termination for any other "legally sufficient" reason.…

    • 3623 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law and Cases

    • 8412 Words
    • 34 Pages

    which in substance was to enforce his rights under the articles. On an application by the defendants for a…

    • 8412 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays