Preview

Worcester vs Georgia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
301 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Worcester vs Georgia
I. Worcester V. Georgia

A. Facts:
1. Samuel Worcester was born in Worcester, Massachusetts, on 19th January,1798

2. Georgia passed 5 laws restricting authority of the Cherokees over their lands
a. Included was a law requiring all whites living in a Cherokee Indian Territory, including missionaries and anyone married to a Cherokee, to obtain a state license to live there

3. Samuel Worcester and 6 other missionaries refused to move from a land that was labeled an “Indian territory”
a. Also, the group refused to apply for the government license that would allow them to reside on the lands

4. An army entered the Native American lands and arrested Worcester along with the other 6 people
a. Following his arrest, Worcester appealed his charges and took his case to the Supreme Court

B. Issue:
1. Worcester's attorneys claimed that the Georgia law he violated was unconstitutional because it conflicted with:
a. U.S.–Cherokee treaties
b. The contract and commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution
c. The sovereign status of the Cherokee nation

2. Worcester’s main argument was that Georgia had no authority within the Cherokee Nation even though it was located within the state’s boundaries
3. This meant that Congress was the only legislative body with authority and not the state of Georgia
4. Should the national rights of the Cherokees be recognized?
5. Should the Georgia law at issue in this case be declared void?

C. Decision:
1. The court upheld the Cherokee’s treaty rights in Georgia
2. Chief Justice Marshall sided with Cherokees and stated that laws were “repugnant to Constitution, laws, and treaties of the US”
3. Only US had authority in Indian Affairs
4. Worcester was ordered free
5. All but one of justices agreed that the national (NOT state) could make laws affecting Cherokee Nation
6. President Andrew Jackson didn’t support decision- didn’t enforce the federal mandate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    4. I disagree with this court decision because I think this was a violation of the fourteenth amendment made by the Supreme Court. I understand why the justices decided as they did, but their duty was…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S V. Korematsu

    • 461 Words
    • 4 Pages

    5. The dissenting opinion raises the fact that Japanese Americans were being deprived of what rights?…

    • 461 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. The majority of the court believed that compulsory exclusion of large groups of citizens from their homes was okay in what situation?…

    • 260 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kent vs Us

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Court ruled the waiver invalid, stating that Kent was entitled to a hearing that measured up to "the essentials of due process and fair treatment," that Kent's counsel should have had access to all records involved in the waiver, and that the judge should have provided a written statement of the reasons for waiver.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the developing history of the United States, native peoples have been there at the side of expanding colonial populations. Always in the periphery of expansion, never fully understood and never maintaining the same rights as that of a “white man”. Written history has often portrayed native peoples as savages and people without reason, ones which must be provided for by the governments in power. It is this shortsighted revelation that would prevail throughout western societal perception and cement the subservient role of the Native peoples. The progression of this rhetoric developed within the United States Supreme Court, namely through the opinions of Chief Justice John Marshall. There are three cases, commonly referred to as the Marshall Trilogy that would set forth the framework for federal Indian law, of which would be used to further diminish and scatter the sovereignty of the native peoples.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eastern Band of Cherokees resisted termination of tribal status and federal responsibilities in Indian affairs during 1940s and 1950s. “For the Eastern Cherokees, the battle over termination began in January 1947” (Nichols, 328). House Concurrent Resolution 108 was an act that called for the abolition of several Indian offices and termination trust responsibilities for certain specified tribes. The Public Law 280 was passed in 1953, which “transferred civil and criminal jurisdiction over most tribes states to the respective local governments and allowed any states to assume similar jurisdiction over their own Indian reservations” (Nichols, 335). The terminationists noted that the Indians deserved better treatment instead of being second-class citizenship because they served well in the war. They stated the Indians should become part of the mainstream American society.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee fought eviction through official channels, eventually winning support for independent status from the LIS. Supreme Court—a decision that prompted Jackson to say, "[Chief Justice] John Marshall has made his decision; let him enforce it now if he can.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush 26

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. Chief Joseph- Leader of Nez Perce. Fled with his tribe to Canada instead of reservations.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American Spirit Volume I

    • 3801 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The ^American Spirit United States History as Seen by Contemporaries Ninth Edition Volume I: To 1877 Houghton Mifflin Company Boston New YorkContents 1 2 Preface xxi New World Beginnings, 33,000 B.C.-A.D.1769 1 A. The Native Americans 1 1. Visualizing the New World (1505, 1509) 1 2. Juan Gines de Sepulveda Belittles the Indians (1547) 3 3.…

    • 3801 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1800s, White settlements were expanding westward. This threatened the Cherokee land which was located in the Southeastern part of the United States. This left the Cherokee with a big decision to make for their entire tribe. Would they relocate West ,or stay for the White settlements to invade where they call home. After all, the Cherokee had owned the land for over 10,000 years. It was not the United States’ land to take. This is why many of the Cherokee Nation felt the need to stay. Others wanted to move because they felt that if they did not, then the United States territory would override the Cherokee customs and they would have to follow United States laws. Clearly the best chance of survival for the Cherokee was to stay in…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Cherokee Nation that had fought the young Andrew Jackson back in 1788 now faced an even more powerful and determined man who was intent on taking their land. But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. They were not called a 'civilized nation' for nothing. Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court. Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. They even approached the President, but he curtly informed them that there was nothing he could do in their quarrel with the state, a statement that shocked and amazed them.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Zinn

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. What were the major causes of war between the Powhatans and the English settlers?…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trail Of Tears Analysis

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Meetings of the Cherokee Legislature and courts were deemed illegal, anyone living on Cherokee land and not Cherokee were subject to approval to do so under Georgia law. Some who refuse like Samuel Worchester, a white missionary who lived on Cherokee territory for years would was jailed and sentenced to “hard labor.” Georgia state legislator efforts were essentially to write the Cherokees out of existence, ignoring the nation’s constitution, borders and laws in the pursuit of…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Q: What arguments did the southern legislator make against the Supreme Court decision? Did they question its power to make the decision or the content of the decision itself?…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays