Preview

Dr. Rank's Announcement Of His Impending Death Affect Nora And Helmer?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
578 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dr. Rank's Announcement Of His Impending Death Affect Nora And Helmer?
D4
A111
1. For what possible reasons do Mrs. Linde pledges herself to Krogstad?
She is lonely and regrets leaving him in the past. She wants children and a husband. According to her, she “needs someone to work for.”
2. How does Dr. Rank’s announcement of his impending death affect Nora and Helmer?
Nora is distraught. She seems to have feelings for him and values his friendship. Helmer also expresses sadness and believes Dr. Ranks should not be left alone. Dr. Ranks was his dear friend and they both will miss him
3. What is Helmer’s reaction to the truth about Nora’s misdeed? Why does he blame Nora’s father?
Helmer is enraged. He demands an explanation from Nora also naming her “a hypocrite, a thief, and a criminal.” Helmer also accuses Nora
…show more content…
She enjoyed balls and dressing up for her husband. However, the reader notices that after Helmer found out her secret she has an epiphany. She realizes their entire marriage had been a fantasy and that her husband never took the time to get to know her. In fact, she realized that Helmer treats her just like her father did. He treats her like a “doll.”
6. How do you interpret her final slamming of the door?
The final slamming of the door symbolizes the end Nora and Helmer’s marriage and the fantasy they built together.
7. Who are the victims in this play? Who are the villains? Explain your answers.
The real victims of the play are the children, and the villains are Nora and Helmer. Nora and Helmer are so concerned about themselves that they do not consider how their actions negatively affect the children.
8. Why are Kristine and Dr. Rank necessary to the play?
Kristine and Dr. Ranks are necessary to the play. Kristine provided a contrast to Nora. She was the voice logic and reason throughout the play. Dr. Ranks is the opposite of Helmer. He was attentive to Nora and thought of her as a grown woman rather than something he could dress up and control.
9. What is your opinion of Nora's final action? What do you think will happen to her in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Nora Dramatic Irony

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nora's epiphany occurs when the truth is finally revealed. As Torvald unleashes his revulsion against Nora and her crime of forgery, the protagonist realizes that her husband is not who she thought he was at all. Torvald has no intention of taking the blame for Nora's crime. She thought for certain that he would selflessly give up everything for her, like she given up so much for him. When he fails to do this, she accepts the fact that their marriage has been an illusion. In this moment Nora’s eyes and mind finally become clear of any delusions she once possessed. Nora was dominated and controlled by her father before marriage and afterwards it was her husband dominating her. Torvald never treated her as an equal. She had existed for her husband and she had always expected that her husband would come to her aid when she was in trouble. She had been waiting for miracles to happen. Nora feared that Krogstad would expose everything and that their family would come undone. Contrary to her expectation, Torvald behaved like a hypocrite concerned more with societies idea of morality and a notion of social prestige, not with his wife's welfare and care. He came out in his true colors. Nora realized that her husband didn't see her as an individual. She wanted to dissolve her ties with him by abandoning him and the children. She thought her duty toward herself was above her duty as a…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora Helmer- Seems happy in the beginning of the play. Teasing Torwald, speaking that she is so excited that his job is giving him more money and loves their family and friends. She is just like a doll, pampered, perfect and pretty. Torwald refers to her as a “silly girl”. She understands the business details related to the debt she has accumulated by taking out a loan to preserve Torvald’s health says that she is brave and intelligent and shows how she is courageous by breaking the law for her husband.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the start of the play, Nora is seen as a caring mother and wife; however, this is an affectation of joy and contentment. In reality, her true character is held enslaved by her tyrannical husband. Her demeaning nicknames, “skylark” and “little song bird” truly are a metaphor for her mental and physical imprisonment to the societal roles of being a mother and wife. Nora accepts this captivity, however, evident through her own use of her nicknames throughout the story in order to pry money from her husband and follow all of his commands. At this point, the audience begins to sense superficiality and materialistic behavior from Nora, but this view soon changes as Ibsen reveals his realistic writing style. Deceit is first seen as she consumes macaroons secretively, in spite of her husband’s disapproval. She begins to reassure to Torvald that she, “should not think of going against (his) wishes’,”(Ibsen,1.4) and is dishonest once again when telling him Chritine Linde and Dr. Rank brought her the desserts. This fraudulence continues as she searches for a way to hastily pay a debt which her financially independent husband is unaware of. She hides the truth from her husband in the same manner she participates in a game of “hide-and-seek” with her…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora Helmer is considered a childish young woman in the play. She lets her husband control her; she acts as if she doesn’t have a mind of her own When she around her husband she acts like she is afraid of him. Every time he tells her to do something like a little puppet she does it. She doesn’t have money of her own so she have to ask him for it .He is always being sarcastic towards her. The only reason he treats her like a child is because she lets him. Since he is the man of the house she follows his rules and order like she is one of his children. Nora let her husband tells her what to do, what to eat and what clothes to were. While her husband to busy controlling her, he doesn’t realized that Nora has a little conniving mind of her own.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A women was not capable of taking on serious issues especially without a higher education. Women were only seen as the caretaker of the household and not the moneymaker. Nora’s decision at the end of the play, played a big role, Nora realizes that she needs to find herself, and not her husband Helmer. The play does not tell us where Nora goes at the end of a play, it leaves us in awe. Maybe Nora left because she wanted a higher education, and in Norway that wasn’t permitted at that time. Nora wants to start a new life without her husband Helmer, she has no money because Helmer was taking care of her. Nora just wants to have her own life, and maybe that means for her to get a higher education and get a job where she doesn’t have to depend on Helmer. I never thought about it in that way until I researched, the question about women’s role in Norway in the 19th century. Many women were dependent on their husbands, or a male figure in there life. Nora was always dependent on Helmer and her father, “I mean that I was simply transferred from Papa’s hand to yours . You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as you or else I pretended to. I am really not quite sure which I think sometimes the one and sometimes the other” (Ibsen, 66). Ibsen created the character Nora as woman who wasn’t following the social marriage norms. When Nora leaves the house, she becomes a symbol for all women, and the article by Largueche shows us how women fought for their education and social norm rights. Some questions still remain, where did Nora go? And did she leave because she wanted a higher education or did she just want to find her true identity? If I were to explore the topic further, I would want their to be a second part to the play “A Doll’s House”. I want to know where Nora went and if she ever got back with Helmer.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus, I believe Nora’s decision to leave Torvald and her children is reasonable and morally justified.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conflict In A Separation

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - She is forced to finally admit the truth to her husband regarding the miscarriage…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “A Doll’s House” Torvald Helmer and Nora start out to seem as a happy married couple with three young children. In the beginning Nora is seen as woman who cares about her children and her husband but someone who also cares greatly about money. Torvald is seen as a man who is important in the society. Nora was portrayed as a very caring wife when it is revealed that she borrowed money illegally from Krogstad to fund the trip to Italy to try and save her husband life because he was sick. Once Krogstad begins to try and blackmail her Nora tries everything in her power to prevent Torvald from discovering the truth so that his pride and reputation would not be hurt or challenged. When Torvald finally discovers the truth about his wife Nora borrowing the money illegally, he was told that the money was from Nora’s father; he became enraged and insulted her by saying things such as “I won’t let you bring up the children” and “Now you’ve destroyed all my happiness. You’ve ruined my whole future.” (Ibsen). After Torvald discovers that Krogstad returned the contract, which Nora forged with her father’s signature, he is filled with happiness and tries to dismiss all the insults that he said to Nora. Nora snapped inside and decided to leave Torvald, she declared that she was going to “stand completely on my own, if I’m going to understand myself and everything around me.” (Ibsen). After she finished talking finally and explaining herself she left her husband, three children, and everything he had given her behind.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play shows the damage, rumors, lies and bullying can do. It is still relatable to situations today. My interpretation of the characters show how their personalities each impact and intertwine into the story. Mary was the manipulator that started the scandal, her Grandmother was the one who took action. Rosalie was the one forced to support Mary’s claims which resulted in Martha and Karen being the victims. When Martha and Karen have one last chance to prove their innocence at a court trial they ultimately lost because Martha Aunt did not show up to testify thanks to her…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many examples of greed are presented in the play. Many of the characters, mostly the young girls and the Putnam’s, are controlled in their way by greed and envy. The most girl accusing the most in…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the worry about not being so reckless with the money? Isn’t Trovald going to have a great paying job? Can’t they spend as they wish?…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with Nora’s decision to abandon her husband and children, she didn’t do it out of selfishness but more of a sacrifice. Nora loved her husband and children very much, but she felt she needed her freedom and independence. Nora didn’t want her children to be like her, she thought by her being immorality that it will pass down to her children, like it passed down to her from her father. Also, Nora realized she had a lot of growing up to do, because she acted like a child more than an adult. She was too dependent on her husband, so she wasn’t independent as a women and wasn’t capable of doing things on her on. Nora husband treated her like a play toy, more than a wife. I think by Nora leaving was a selfless thing to do, because she wanted…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Doll's House

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the midst of what seemed like the perfect marriage, Nora realized how imperfect it really was and figured out what was best for her even if it meant her giving up all she had. This imperfection starts to settle in while she was talking with and old friend, Ms.Linde, in act one. By the beginning of Act two she has come to the full conclusion of her unhappiness and resolved to kill herself. This idea changed to a less dramatic ending of her just leaving her family behind, which would cost her everything but at the same time it was happy because she comes to the realization through her actions that she has been treated as a doll for her whole life first by her father then later by her husband and has never been taken seriously. When her husband finds out about her illegal deeds to save his life and lashes out, it hits her with full force that what they have is all imaginary. This may seem sad, her leaving her children and lifestyle, but it is good because she realizes she is independent and ready to be treated as if she was her own person and not a doll with no real purpose or power other than to be played with.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Human Condition

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages

    somehow she felt betrayed and she killed her husband. She couldn’t believe what she did…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In act 1, Ibsen immediately portrays the protagonist’s, Nora, status as a woman in the household. She is a symbol of the women of her era, who were believed to be content with just the business of the home. She has been buying presents for Christmas, and is described as being, “busy opening some of the parcels”. Nora busies herself with small matters, hiding macaroons and organizing things. Although her husband, Torvald, labels Nora as “my little squirrel” and a variety of other animals in a patronizing manner, Nora seems to act in the same as a woodland creature, continuously “scampering about”. Nora behaves like a small child, hiding macaroons from her husband and spending excessive amounts of money; Torvald is not entirely incorrect in his statement of, “has my little spendthrift been wasting money again”. Although Nora’s character seems to exhibit some complexity on an emotional level, she lacks a deep relationship and understanding of life outside of the house and Torvald, suggesting things such as borrowing money and, later, not realizing that forgery is a crime. One of the main causes of this is Torvald’s treatment of and relationship with Nora. Helmer’s mind-set is apparent in everything he say’s to Nora, as well as his degrading pet names, “lark”, “squirrel”, “songbird”, and his objectification of her. However, his diminutive nature towards Nora is more similar to that of a father than that of a loving husband. She is entirely dependent on him for…

    • 851 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays