Preview

Nora Dramatic Irony

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
886 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nora Dramatic Irony
Moreover, a very intriguing ironic parallel can be drawn between Nora and Torvald, when Torvald finds out about Nora’s forgery, he exclaims “Now you’ve wrecked all my happiness—ruined my whole future. Oh, it’s awful to think of. I’m in a cheap little grafter’s hands; he can do anything he wants with me, ask for anything, play with me like a puppet—and I can’t breathe a word. I’ll be swept down miserably into the depths on account of a featherbrained woman” (1292), which is a complete role-reversal of the literal control Torvald has over Nora, because all of those years she was his ‘puppet’. A supplementary illustration of dramatic irony is when Torvald says that he will willingly sacrifice his happiness and dignity if some danger were to threaten …show more content…
Nora counts the remaining hours of her life after the rehearsal because she thinks she is going to sacrifice herself, before her husband would sacrifice himself for her. Both sacrifices never occur and the theme of the play is a twisted irony to the separation and uncertainty of life. Torvald’s “helpless little thing”, Nora, ironically becomes stronger, confident, independent and serious in life. Torvald’s so imagined possession, his little doll, his beautiful treasure becomes ironically a complete stranger to …show more content…
Nora's epiphany occurs when the truth is finally revealed. As Torvald unleashes his revulsion against Nora and her crime of forgery, the protagonist realizes that her husband is not who she thought he was at all. Torvald has no intention of taking the blame for Nora's crime. She thought for certain that he would selflessly give up everything for her, like she given up so much for him. When he fails to do this, she accepts the fact that their marriage has been an illusion. In this moment Nora’s eyes and mind finally become clear of any delusions she once possessed. Nora was dominated and controlled by her father before marriage and afterwards it was her husband dominating her. Torvald never treated her as an equal. She had existed for her husband and she had always expected that her husband would come to her aid when she was in trouble. She had been waiting for miracles to happen. Nora feared that Krogstad would expose everything and that their family would come undone. Contrary to her expectation, Torvald behaved like a hypocrite concerned more with societies idea of morality and a notion of social prestige, not with his wife's welfare and care. He came out in his true colors. Nora realized that her husband didn't see her as an individual. She wanted to dissolve her ties with him by abandoning him and the children. She thought her duty toward herself was above her duty as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    At the start of the play, Nora is seen as a caring mother and wife; however, this is an affectation of joy and contentment. In reality, her true character is held enslaved by her tyrannical husband. Her demeaning nicknames, “skylark” and “little song bird” truly are a metaphor for her mental and physical imprisonment to the societal roles of being a mother and wife. Nora accepts this captivity, however, evident through her own use of her nicknames throughout the story in order to pry money from her husband and follow all of his commands. At this point, the audience begins to sense superficiality and materialistic behavior from Nora, but this view soon changes as Ibsen reveals his realistic writing style. Deceit is first seen as she consumes macaroons secretively, in spite of her husband’s disapproval. She begins to reassure to Torvald that she, “should not think of going against (his) wishes’,”(Ibsen,1.4) and is dishonest once again when telling him Chritine Linde and Dr. Rank brought her the desserts. This fraudulence continues as she searches for a way to hastily pay a debt which her financially independent husband is unaware of. She hides the truth from her husband in the same manner she participates in a game of “hide-and-seek” with her…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is Christmas time when the play begins and with a larger income starting after the New Year, Nora is excited for a arrival of a new life. Yet, this ideal life for her begins to change when an old friend by the name of Mrs. Linde pays a visit to the Helmer household. Mrs. Linde, looking for a job has come to Nora looking for help through her husband; this excitement has Nora believing “He must Christine. Just leave it to me; I will broach the subject very cleverly- I will think of something that will please him very much. It will make me so happy to be of some use to be you” (677). Although, Torvald is happy to offer Mrs. Linde a job, Nora is unaware is has taken one step closer to her secret being reveal.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora herself is the most important symbol throughout the whole play. Torvald has complete control over all of Nora’s therefore she is treated more like a child rather than a wife. Throughout the play Torvald refers to her by childish nicknames such as “squirrel” and “little song-bird”. Torvald has also commanded Nora not to eat macaroons because they will rot her…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To illustrate, Torvald does not think of Nora as an equal. In the opening sequence, Nora tells her maid that nobody can see their Christmas tree until it has achieved full beauty. She uses this exact same perspective on Torvald when he unknowingly requests to see her dress. In a sinister way, this parallelism shows that Torvald sees Nora just as Nora views the tree, as an item to decorate, and show off to others. Additionally, Torvald often calls Nora by pet names, such as “Skylark,” “Squirrel,” or “Songbird’” inferring she is merely a belonging to him. Moreover, Nora even begins to adopt these pet names for herself, in order to attract his attention. For example, she asks Torvald “If [his] little squirrel were to ask [him] for something very, very prettily” (Ibsen 38) in an attempt to invoke sympathy. She knows squirrels are helpless in the clutches of humans, so she uses these appalling names Torvald labeled her with in order to gain sympathy, proving neither she nor her husband view her as a person quite yet. Finally, Torvald is not willing to sacrifice anything for her. Torvald tells her outright that he would never “sacrifice his honor for the one he loves” (Gaines 78). With this statement, he essentially tells Nora that she will never be his top priority; she will always play second fiddle to his honor. In summary, Nora has never been a true person in her time with…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in a Doll's House

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nora is controlled by the men in the play and lies behind their back. Torvald continuously acts as a father figure to Nora. Torvald saysHe does not let her speak and feels only his voice matters. Torvald is not only demanding mentally and physically, but also financially. He does not trust Nora with money. He feels that she is…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Nora realizes that she must find her true self, the ways in which Krogstad,…

    • 2859 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It seems Nora thinks that she is above others because of what she has. In her conversations with Mrs. Linde, Nora seems to be sure of herself when Mrs. Linde questions her about where she got the money for the trip from. "I could have gotten it some other way" Nora says, "An admirer may have given it to me. When you're as tolerably good looking as I am" (Ibsen 1089). Nora tries to justify everything that she does with an invalid excuse. In her conversations with Krogstad, Nora admits to signing her fathers name to the loan without considering the implications of the deal. Krogstad confronts Nora about this to which she says, "That trip was to save my husband's life. I couldn't give it up" (Ibsen 1099). Again Nora tries to justify her reasoning for having to borrow the money for the trip. When Torvald learns of the loan that Nora took to pay for their vacation trip he becomes enraged over this issue saying, "You have ruined all my happiness. My whole future-that’s what you have destroyed" (Ibsen 1133). During the whole play he emphasizes the importance of not being in debt to Nora. Torvald talks to Nora as a father does to his daughter. Nora was able to make an easy transition from being a spoiled daughter under the care of her father to being a spoiled wife. Therefore she never quite understood that there is a risk involved…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nora and Oedipus

    • 662 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nora, a subservient house wife breaks free from her oppression by standing up to her dominating husband once and for all. Due to her major flaw, or harmatia, Nora sees nothing wrong with simply living as slave to Torvald. She does not have enough self-respect to acknowledge the fact that her own husband treats her like a doll and “little by little the doll dies” (Durbach 63). Nora must overcome her husband or she will be doomed to die like a little doll. Even Nora believes that once she has “lost her looks” she will have to find other ways to please her controlling husband (Isben 1722). This realization shows that Nora has some level of self-awareness which ultimately grows into revolt against her controlling husband. Isben utilizes catharsis by illustrating Nora’s disparity while her life begins to unravel. Nora believes that “something glorious” will happen once Torvald read the letter (Isben 1753). She hopes that he will be so infuriated with Krogstad’s dishonesty he will underplay the severity of the crime she committed. Nora shares the same disparity as Oedipus, yet his major flaw causes a more tragic outcome.…

    • 662 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether the reason for Nora’s child-like behavior is at the fault of her husband, or herself, one cannot deny that she is indeed a puppet in her “picture-perfect” life. Torvald dictates her every mood, down to the last macaroon. Until she is free from his interfering hands Nora will never grow up. Perhaps her mature decision to take out…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First her father spoiled her and then her husband took up where her father left off. All her life Nora has been yoked and tethered. This loan she took out was to save her husband’s life, but he doesn’t see things that way. Rather then thanking her for risking her reputation to save his life, he yells at her and bellows at her to the fullest. This is when Nora realizes that all the money in the world won’t save her. She realizes that her husband and father have both encased her in glass and played the role of the puppet master while she marionettes as the puppet. The debt was never the chain, Torvald was. No matter how much money she showered about, nothing could buy her husband’s respect. It was at this moment when Nora decided to…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Response to a Doll House

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the story Torvald’s appearance began to unfold. He didn’t have a clue to what extent his wife Nora would go for the sake of his well-being; destroying his dignity was not worth risking. Torvald said to Nora, "I would gladly work night and day for you, Nora - bear sorrow and want for your sake. But no man would sacrifice his honour for the one he loves" (214). Nora unknowingly committed a crime in order to keep Torvald’s sanity, and has carried the burden of having financial issues. She feared of him finding out because she knew he would never…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Numerous things can be seen in the three acts of the play. First it becomes quite clear, that Torvald and his relationship with Nora is heavily influenced by 19th century beliefs of what a marriage should look like. Torvald himself believes that he is the ideal husband, he thinks his wife is clueless and he believes that he is her savior. However, in reality Torvald is clueless, and Nora is his savior. Furthermore, it evident that Nora is everything Torvald ever wanted to be. Despite everything Nora is still willing to play her traditional role in the house, but it all changes when Torvald reveals his true…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Doll's House

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Finally, by Act III, Nora resembles a feministic character when she stands up for herself. Her choice to leave Torvald illustrates her independence, capability as a woman, and her inner tenacity. These components collectively allow Nora to finally disclose who she is without Torvald regulating every aspect of her life. Upon her leaving, Nora proclaims, "You and Daddy have wronged me greatly. The two of you are to blame for the fact that nothing has come of me" (Ibsen, 182-183). This scene is where Nora entirely uncovers her emotions, because she is finally unafraid. It is utterly apparent that Torvald has mistreated her, and by leaving him, she is enforcing feminism and doing what is best for herself. This is iconoclastic, because Ibsen has taken a typical marriage from the past and brought the possibility of a woman fighting for her equality to light. This denies the norms, because women in the past were not feminists. They were considered lesser, and that was that. Nora's character represents a breakthrough for womens' clout, and for feminism…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Dolls House Essay

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The most obvious symbol is Nora herself. Nora, pretending to be the perfect wife that her controlling husband wants, is the "doll" of the house.She is dying inside to find herself and to become free of all the work that comes with being the perfect wife in that time period. Torvald also treats her as if she were a doll. He treats her as is she was an object, something that belonged to him that he thought he could never lose, as if she were a toy rather than being a human being. He controls Nora's life to the point that he refers to her with degrading pet names, such as “my little spendthrift”, and pats her on the head like a puppy."Come, come, my little skylark must not droop her wings. What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper? (Taking out his purse.) Nora, what do you think I have got here”(Ibsen)., this passage shows that even his tone towards her is degrading, as if she was too dumb to understand, like an animal."It's a sweet little bird, but it gets through a terrible amount of money. You wouldn't believe how much it costs a man when he's got a little song-bird like you!" (Ibsen). Torvald portrays how he sees Nora as property in this passage, just spending away his…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Doll House

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the opening of the play Nora is appearing to be a very selfish and silly young girl who does not know how to take care of money. As the story progresses the reader soon comes to realize though that Nora has given everything she could to save her husbands life. She took out a secret loan to take him on a vacation for his health and has been consistently paying it back each month without letting her husband know. Instead of being a spendthrift, as she was perceived, she was being very sly and clever.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays