Preview

Drones Persuasive Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drones Persuasive Speech
How do you feel about drones killing innocent people by mistake? On the afternoon of April 3rd, last year, a curious looking airplane slammed into the ground next to an elementary school, luckily there was no school that day, but the aircraft turned out to be a drone or unmanned aerial vehicle operated by the U.S military. Knowing you can get hit by a drone, anywhere, anytime without a reason, is exactly why I feel we should not allow drones.
The U.S talks about other countries doing this and doing that, but they turn around to do the same thing, they are being hypocritical. Some of the targets have no idea that they are getting killed and the U.S has no real possibility knowing is someone is a terrorists or not unless they personally know them. We might have a low disapproval on the drones, the U.S are killing people when they don’t agree on having drones in the first place. There is a quote which kind of shows and says a lot, “Airstrikes in other
…show more content…
Most of the countries disagree on having drones, one reason is that they don’t having money or just can’t afford drones. Drones are legal under the international law. Since George W. Bush was president the rate of drone strikes, increased by 311 attacks. It shows that Barack Obama is serious and will put his foot down if it is needed.
The question is “Would you support or oppose the use of drones in warfare?” My answer would be to oppose the use of drones in warfare. Drones strikes create more terrorists that they kill. Legal experts believe the potential for drones violate people’s right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution. They do nothing good for us, they kill innocent people who were not intended to get killed and they put people in the military out of work. When the military is out of work they will go to school and find a job, but it leaves us with little to no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 5 8

    • 6115 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Primary consumers (herbivores) feed directly on producers. Secondary consumers (carnivores) feed on primary consumers. Consumers that feed on both plants and animals are called omnivores.…

    • 6115 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There's an explosion, it kills some soldiers but it mostly just destroys some drones in the area. A drone is an unmanned ship controlled remotely. It's morally correct to use drones because it reduces the chance of harming our soldiers, it shows loyalty to our troops, and it's fair for us to use the resourceful technology available to us. If we're using drones rather than soldiers, it's putting fewer soldiers at risk to be harmed. It's not showing loyalty to our country when we're defending the opponent. It's also fair for us to use our technology to our advantage; it's not our problem if other countries lack supplies.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drones are expensive to build and upkeep. For example the border drones require an hour of maintenance for every hour they fly and sometimes they can not even take off if it is too windy or there is a little bit of rain.The government spent over 250 million dollars to build the largest fleet of drones (Bennet,Drones).All that money could have gone to building homes for the homeless…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand the argument can be made that drones are invading the privacies of people and are a nuisance that will lead to a more robotic sky than a natural one. These are true and are concerns for the future, drones have a number of more benefits than cons. Drones provide a more stress free life and will lead to a more productive society because of their ability to be mobile and compact. Drones are the way of the future and will be seen more in the news and in more controversial debates but they are the best way to go heading into the future so they should be allowed to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In all, drones are not beneficial for U.S. military use because they lack human qualities, violating the sovereignty of other countries, and allowing people to let the horrific memories of war slowly fade away. People need to feel protected by other humans, not drones. The cost of their maintenance and newer models would add up quickly. Malfunctions could occur and cause many innocent lives to be taken. This is why using drones in the place of U.S. soldiers would be a huge mistake.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Drones are the latest technological advancement in warfare. The U.S. has used them heavily since the 1950s mostly for reconnaissance until the war in Afghanistan, when the U.S. first started using drone strikes. Drones are used because they keep our “boots off the ground”, help prevent friendly-fire and the stop most of the unnecessary killing of civilians. Their use in warfare is an ethical way to fight, it just keeps our military safer. They are also a relatively cheap and effective way to defeat the enemy. The use of drones in combat and wars has been used extensively by the U.S. for reconnaissance and drone strikes and should be continued for these purposes, since it protects our military and the civilians that would ordinarily…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s a bird, no it’s a plane, no it’s probably actually a drone bot. Forty-two percent of people in the U.S. completely disapprove of the personal use of drones, according to a poll done in 2014. While that is for personal drone use the poll also represents a section for drone use in oversea warfare. Now you might think, oh yeah drones would be a major advantage in the war on terrorism, and if you agree you're agreeing with 85 percent of people in this poll. However, we still have some people saying that having the advantage of drones would not be a good thing, now why would that be? Drone strikes not only put fear into the people of countries that are being monitored, but they are also highly likely to take casualties of war and possibly not get the target at all. On the contrary drones save lives of our soldiers, and shouldn't we be thinking of our loved ones out there?…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays