The U.S talks about other countries doing this and doing that, but they turn around to do the same thing, they are being hypocritical. Some of the targets have no idea that they are getting killed and the U.S has no real possibility knowing is someone is a terrorists or not unless they personally know them. We might have a low disapproval on the drones, the U.S are killing people when they don’t agree on having drones in the first place. There is a quote which kind of shows and says a lot, “Airstrikes in other …show more content…
Most of the countries disagree on having drones, one reason is that they don’t having money or just can’t afford drones. Drones are legal under the international law. Since George W. Bush was president the rate of drone strikes, increased by 311 attacks. It shows that Barack Obama is serious and will put his foot down if it is needed.
The question is “Would you support or oppose the use of drones in warfare?” My answer would be to oppose the use of drones in warfare. Drones strikes create more terrorists that they kill. Legal experts believe the potential for drones violate people’s right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution. They do nothing good for us, they kill innocent people who were not intended to get killed and they put people in the military out of work. When the military is out of work they will go to school and find a job, but it leaves us with little to no