Preview

Drug Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drug Policy
Background
Drug Policy within the United Kingdom has been a highly controversial cross-cutting issue, encompassing all types of policy areas predominately Health and Justice departments. The current drug policy within the United Kingdom is dealt with from a criminal justice perspective by the Home Office and are dealt with under the Misuse of Drug Act (MDA) 1971. Currently under the MDA, both possession and supplying are dealt with as criminal offences. These controlled substances are categorised under three classes, A, B, and C. Class A is the most severe carrying a maximum possession sentence of seven years and lifetime imprisonment for supplying. Class C being the least severe with maximum sentence for possession of two years and fourteen
…show more content…

The current system may lead to the lowering of drug usage however drug deaths are at an all-time high with the morality rate of 43.8 per million population with heroin and morphine death doubled since 2012, as recorded in a report by the Office for National Statistics(ONS). Public Policy Professor Wayne Parsons notes that after the 1997 UK General Election, much was made of evidence-based policy making (EBPM) by the Blair Administration, mentioned within a white paper called ‘Modernising Government’. Drug policy is a key policy area in which EBPM has not applied, the current policy aims to eradicate drug usage to reduce harm from drug usage. The evidence suggests that the policy is not working and we should adapt a different policy towards drug which reduced overall harm from drug usage in an age of …show more content…

Due to this in relation to the problems, this report’s policy goals it hopes to achieve is harm reduction. As noted by leading drug researcher Alison Ritter, harm reduction can be defined as a policy option and a group of different drug interventions. In terms of policy option, harm reduction typically means accepting usage of drugs and using a health framework to help people who need help. In contrast to current drug policy, harm reduction does not target lowering of drugs. This report identifies that the main goal of government drug policy should be harm reduction in terms of the individual and society. To do this we need to pursue a health based approach rather than a criminal justice approach. This position is advocated by after several decades fighting the ‘war on drugs’ we have not achieved government goal of elimination of drug usage. Peter Reuter acknowledges this is not a great position and we should focus on the harm reduction strategies that shall be laid out.
In terms of the secondary goal of overcrowding of prisons and due to the nature of the current austerity, we should aim to save money by finding ways to cut expenditure spent on dealing with the ‘War on Drugs’. The amount of money spent on the enforcement of Class A prohibition is estimated to be £15.3 billion in 2003/04 by Transform, a drug focused interest group. The money on spent


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    SOC305 Week 2 Assignment

    • 1274 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Newman, T., (2014). How should our society deal with people who use drugs? Drug Policy…

    • 1274 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The response to drug use in America and in some countries around the world seems to have an interesting history. As the author Daniel Patrick Moynihan describes the unintended consequences society faces when government does not deal effectively with issues of drugs in society. He provided several references that shows the historical and present connections to government interrelations and how many of these decisions have some form of negative impact and at times causes social breakdown. His historical reference to drug uses, medicinal properties as well as technology role in our present age does paint a vivid picture of how government decisions can affect us. Since the article was a bit difficult to follow in the beginning and kept discussing historical and current events, I had to focus on the relevance of what was happening then, now and probably what will happen in the future if our government does not address the pros and cons of dangerous drugs, technology and how not addressing these issues can lead to societal breakdown.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first of these was the Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences4 policy of 1986. This would be the first time that mandatory sentencing would be passed by congress after the Boggs Act of 19515. By November 18th 1988, the Anti Drug Abuse Act6 too would be passed, establishing the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). The ONDCP is headed by reputable ‘drug czars’ who stand as faces of the anti-drug movement.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all Harm minimisation is multiple drug policies in which are used a way of educating individuals and societies about alcohol and other drugs issues, in an act to reduce its harmful and dangerous effects. It was initially developed to help adults how has been involved with substance abuse. These reduction strategies are able to help both an individual and the community, in which who experience the consequences of taking drugs. Harm Minimisation programs are made to consider both the health, social and economic consequences of AOD use for people in the community. Since 1985 the launch of the National Campaign against Drug Abuse and subsequent National Drug Strategy, this has been a key focus and policy of the Federal governments and Australian state.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Methadone Discursive Essay

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is shocking to hear that “giving methadone to heroin addicts has a 97% failure rate.”(1) I was extremely surprised to hear this because I thought and was made to believe that after a few years methadone would completely stop addicts taking heroin. Infact in the same study by Scotland’s leading drug experts it emerged that there was a “29% success rate among addicts who went ‘cold turkey’ in a rehabilitation centre”(1). Clearly the way forward is to build more rehabilitation centres and get this success rate higher. So why is this not happening? If such serious problems, which are having a big impact on Scotland today are to be resolved we need to address the need for rehabilitation centres, improve the help that the NHS and the Government are giving out and why the problems concerning heroin and methadone are now getting out of hand.…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: McVay, D.A. (2011, January 26). Drug War Facts: Common Sense for Drug Policy. Retrieved from…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    7. Dolin, Benjamin. "National Drug Policy: The Netherlands." Parliament of Canada Web Site - Site Web Du Parlement Du Canada. 15 Aug. 2001. Web. 10 June 2011. <http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/371/ille/library/dolin1-e.htm>.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Alcohol, Tobacco Worse Than Illegal Drugs” a new British study found that alcohol and tobacco are more dangerous than some illegal narcotics such as marijuana or Ecstasy. Professor David Nutt of Britain’s Bristol University and some colleagues proposed the study and found a new structure for the “classification of harmful substances based on the actual risk posed to society” (Conroy, 2007). The researchers used three factors to determine how harmful any drug is : “the physical harm to the user, the drug’s potential for addiction, and the impact on society of drug use” (Conroy, 2007). Then two groups of experts (psychiatrists or medical expertise) were asked to select scores of twenty different drugs. In the rankings, heroin and cocaine were the most dangerous, followed by barbiturates and street methadone. Alcohol ranked the fifth-most dangerous drug, while tobacco ranked the ninth. Surprisingly, cannabis came in the eleventh spot and Ecstasy was near the bottom of the list. Nutt believes that the current British drug system is “ill thought-out and arbitrary” (Conroy, 2007). Even though different countries use different ways to classify drugs, none of them use a system like Nutt proposed and he hopes that his new system could “serve as a framework for international authorities” (Conroy, 2007).…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, (Gray, 2012); discusses the impossibility of prohibition to ever be enforced, specifically in the means of drugs. As a former judge, Gray has insight into exactly how many people are incarcerated due to the mental disease of drug addiction, and how criminalizing their use does everything but aid our citizens. As the current USA's drug policy has only worsened the problem since 1970, he suggests to create a new policy with ten major goals in mind, focusing on decreasing the harm illicit substances have on our population as well as the harm drug money has on the world. There are logical reasonings given that support that legalizing the distribution of drugs by the government would put dangerous dealers out of business and make…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every country, it is important for the government to balance the three policies that they have in place, including prohibition, legalization and decriminalization. For each of these policy, there are certain benefits and costs that makes one suitable than the others. Take prohibition for example, it is ‘’refers to a policy of criminalization, whereby the production, manufacture, growing, and possession of drugs are violation of one or more criminal statutes’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 437). In addition, prohibition helped send ‘’a symbolic message about virtues valued by most Americans’’ (Faupel, Weaver & Corzine, pg. 443). Compared to other policies, prohibition offers a few advantages that others simply do not have. For starter, this particular policy would limit the number of users who use illegal or unhealthy drugs in society. As we all know, the effects of some of the drugs are detrimental to the health of the users…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the UK alcohol is a legal drug and is consumed on daily basis and is an important part of the culture but at the same time illicit drugs are considered socially unacceptable and are given grouping as per their potential for damage (Davies 2012). Even though health, criminal justice and social policy are all applicable to both alcohol and drugs it is this varying level of acceptance of alcohol and other drugs that proved difficult for policy makers to devise a single policy encompassing alcohol and other drugs (Davies :2012). The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 which categorise various substances considers alcohol and tobacco to be legal while other drugs like cocaine, heroin and cannabis etc… are considered unlawful. Both tobacco and alcohol are thought to be the reason for death in larger number of cases than the unlawful drugs, yet both substances are considered to be legal and not subject to criminal conviction (McKeganey: 2014). In the UK policy makers and the society can be seen more inclined to the zero tolerance approach towards illicit drugs as opposed to the harm reduction approach. In 1980s following research findings of high rates of HIV amongst injecting drug users harm reduction approach was placed on the agenda for the drug users who were unable to abstain resulting in practices like needle exchange, advice on safer injecting practice, safe injecting centers, methadone and heroin prescribing brought in to reduce the harm (McKeganey:2014). Davies (2012) provides an overview of the drug strategy in the UK and identifies that ‘Tackling Drug Misuse’ was the first drug strategy introduced in 1985 by the Margaret Thatcher’s government and the priorities plainly laid out a move towards social control and criminal justice reaction to the illicit drug use,…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Illicit drug policy has not been a priority on the political agenda, but it is a policy that affects 6,902,527 Australians directly and has incurred a cost of billions of dollars to Australian society. The first paper in this report analyses the presence of illicit drugs in society, the costs of the drugs to society, and past and current policies. The second paper presents our recommendations and approaches to create an Illicit drug policy that is proactive and effective in minimising the harms of illicit drug use to the user and to society as a whole.…

    • 4508 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 20th ASEAN summit in May 2012, declaration on Drug Free ASEAN 2015 was…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this piece I plan to look at drug legalisation and how it would be a vastly positive thing around the world. Drugs are a sensitive subject. This is not a piece in support of taking drugs, nor is it an essay on the wonders of marijuana consumption. Instead it is simply a look at how much more stable and controlled our drug culture and general way of life would be if drugs were legalised. I will look at first of all the reasons why drug prohibition has failed and then at the thriving alternative that other countries have found: controlled legalisation. There are simply no positive reasons to criminalise any illegal drugs and I plan to show you why.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soft Drugs

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The drug policy in the Netherlands aims: to reduce the demand for drugs, the supply of drugs and the risks to drug users, their immediate surroundings and society.…

    • 557 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays