“A small number of public schools had been testing students for drugs as early as the late 1900s. In 1985 the united states supreme court held in the case new jersey vs T.L.O that unlike law enforcement authorities, schools were not required to have probable cause it to secure a warrant in order to carry out searches to students property when common sense indicated that there was cause for suspicion.” It talk about the court disease making drug testing logical without probable cause.’
It may seem odd that a school can require your kid to get tested simply for joining say the chess club. But the supreme court upheld the constitutionality of such program in 20002. We find that testing students who participate in extracurricular activities is a reasonably effective means of addressing the school district's legitimate …show more content…
Schools often time funding for after schools activities and they have some type of drug testing system. School drug tests tend to not yield a lot of positive results. Sharon levy of the AAP estimates that it costs $3,000 for each positive tests, or about 1 positive for every 125 students tested. That means that carroll county, georgia's $20,000 investment will turn about 6 student drug users, 7 if there