Preview

Legal Memorandum

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2780 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Memorandum
MEMORANDUM

To: Scott Haddock, Supervising Attorney

From: Bob Barker, Super Senior Paralegal

Re: Paige Turner Our file No.: 12095 Public school searches

Date: June 6, 2013

I. Issues

1. The issue is whether public school officials have the authority to perform strip searches of students in suspicion of hiding illegal drugs.

2. The issue is whether public school districts can perform random drug screening of students who participate in school athletic programs under state or federal law.

II. Brief Answers

1. No. Strip searches of students in public schools of students are completely prohibited by state and federal law under any circumstances.

2. Public school officials are in violation of Washington State law but are not in violation of Federal law by conducting random drug tests on students who participate in athletic programs.

III. Facts

Mr. and Mrs. Turner have contacted our law firm to assess potential civil rights violations regarding their 18-year-old daughter Paige Turner.

On April 19, 2013, an undisclosed student informed Vice Principal Robyn Banks, of West Lynnwood High School that Senior Dan Druff distributed some type of pill to fellow senior Paige Turner during study hall earlier that morning. Later that day, Vice Principal Banks called Ms. Turner into her office and interrogated her about the incident. Immediately, Ms. Turner admitted that Mr. Druff gave her a pill, but also explained that it was an extra-strength Tylenol used to treat her headache. Mrs. Banks informed Ms. Turner that, by accepting this medicine without a prescription or doctor’s note, she violated LSD’s Alcohol and Drug Policy 24.36(b).

Mrs. Banks advised Ms. Turner to call her parents and inform them of the situation. As Mrs. Turner shuffled through her purse in search of her cell phone, a small clear plastic bag that contained unlabeled pills accidentally fell onto Vice Principal Banks’ desk. Vice

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Ms. Baker, Natalie’s tattoo would lead to a decline in sales. Although Ms. Baker was not able to provide the documents to support this. Ms. Bakers did provide the names of two longtime customers who indeed did request different tables.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although students do not lose their rights as they walk through the school gates, their rights are restricted for the safety of others. The court case of Tinker v. Des Moines argues the same issue of the rights of students while on school grounds. “Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work, they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students” (OYEZ). As the armbands distracted students, the inappropriate photos of Suzie distracted upperclassmen from their educational work, which also put Suzie in an uncomfortable position depriving herself the ability to focus 100% on school work. Therefore, the principal was taking away a distraction to discipline the students which can be compared to the case of Tinker v. Des…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The officials at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County, New Jersey, didn’t believe that they were violating the Constitution when Mr. Theodore Choplick searched the purse of T.L.O. She had been caught in the bathroom smoking cigarettes with another girl. Upon searching her purse, Choplick found a package of cigarette rolling papers, a pipe,…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Memorandum of Law

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Was Cruz Estrada’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure violated when Officer Green grabbed Cruz Estrada’s purse from her shoulder and searched it without her consent, and can the evidence found in Cruz Estrada’s purse be suppressed due to the search being impermissible?…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Case Letter

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR – List what was unfair about the arrest and first trial PG 3…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now let's review the evidence you have heard this evening. You heard from Lynn Roper, an Educational Administration expert. Mr. Roper testified that random drug testing of high school student athletes is the most viable and effective option for preventing performance-enhancing drug abuse. The defendant has tried to claim that drug testing is just too expensive, but RGHS's own assistant principal and athletic director has admitted that they are able to pay their teacher-coaches very well. Roughed Grouse also has parent incentive programs that voluntarily donate thousands of dollars to the school. With this kind of money, there is no excuse for not drug testing. Nonetheless, RGHS administration neglected to test. So what else can be done? Mr. Roper testified that even without testing, all that is required is vigilance by coaches and athletic directors in watching their student athletes for signs of steroid abuse. This, ladies and gentlemen, is where Roughed Grouse neglected its duty. The defendant…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legality of a random search depends on whether the school has a compelling interest or special need that warrants the use of a search without suspicion.” All schools should be allowed these random searches without suspicion just for simple safety.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aed 200 Week 4

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it comes to random student locker searches, I feel that all teachers have the responsibility to give any information that they may have concerning any illegal acts that their students are involved in. If this information leads to the administration searching that student’s locker, then it is being done to make sure all the students are being kept safe. I do not feel that anyone’s locker should be searched without a significant amount of proof or suspicion. It should not be done just because the student is considered a trouble maker. Though a student may be breaking the law or rules of the school, I feel that the student still has the right to have their privacy protected. When searching the locker, I feel that some discretion needs to be taken. Allowing the student body to know why and when another student’s locker is being searched would be, in my opinion, considered an infringement on their privacy. I feel that all of the students rights should always be protected. It goes with the old rule of thumb, innocent until proven guilty. Even when found guilty, the rights of the students should still be protected, but only to the extent that it maintains the safety of the student body. For example, if nothing is found during the search, not only could this be embarrassing to the student, it could also be an embarrassment to the school administration. On the other hand, if a gun were to be found in the student’s locker, then that student would not have the right to just leave the school. Their rights would be limited in order to keep the rest of the students safe.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The policing of drug use in sports should be the job of the athletic associations and not the congressional leaders of our country. Furthermore, those people who have the responsibility of…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    T.L.O. decision. In the case of Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton the court approved of random drug testing of athletic students based on no suspicion or "reasonableness" at all. Writing for the opinion of the court Justice Scalia says that, "A search unsupported by probable cause can be constitutional, we have said, 'when special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement, make the warrant and probable-cause requirement impracticable.'" He then goes on to argue that "We have found such 'special needs' to exist in the public-school context. There the warrant requirement 'would unduly interfere with the maintenance of the swift and informal disciplinary procedures [that are] needed, 'and strict adherence to the requirement that searches be based upon probable cause' would undercut 'the substantial need of teachers and administrators for freedom to maintain order in the schools.'…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supreme Court

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mawdsley, R. D. (2003). RANDOM DRUG TESTING FOR EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES: HAS THE SUPREME COURT OPENED PANDORA 'S BOX FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS?. Brigham Young University Education & Law Journal, (2), 587.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another controversial practice is the recent expansion of compulsory , random drug testing. The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionally of blood and urine tests of rail employees involved in train accidents, of federal employees, and of high school students engaged in interscholastic athletic…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without suspicion of drug use, schools cannot require drug tests of athletes, because it violates their Fourth Amendment right. According to the US Bill Of Rights: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause.” (Cayton). This means that you need probable cause or suspicion of drug use before you can require a drug test of someone. School athletes should not be subject to unjust searches based on non-existent evidence. The searches would be both unlawful and unreasonable thus making the policy unconstitutional. Nevertheless, there are many people who oppose this policy, and believe that student-athlete drug testing is needed to protect the common good and ensure the safety of everyone (Mikula). However, no policy should be able to violate the constitution and infringe on the student’s privacy. An example of this is from a court case involving a Texas School District. The Texas School argued that they needed a policy to test student-athletes for drugs to help control the “drug crisis” going on at their school.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays