Preview

Due Process Supporters

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2569 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Due Process Supporters
Due Process Supporters

The concern about gun control causes an uproar to many supporters of the due process system. First, many supporters argue that gun control restricts rights given to the people of the United States, by the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms). They argue, that if strong gun control laws were to be placed there would be a likely possibility for those laws to be claimed unconstitutional and a reevaluation of the law would have to occur. Second, the tense topic “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is raised. Believers of this often insist on evaluating how gun control laws have previously affected crime rates. When data is evaluated the reality of it is, crime rates don’t go down when gun control restrictions are increased. Most believe that bad people will find other ways to get a gun. Finally, due process supporters state that by creating strict gun control laws you are restricting law abiding citizens from engaging in many activities. For many, guns are a major part of their lifestyle, for example; hunting and sport shooting. These people are abiding by all the rules and regulations, therefore by restricting them from using guns it would be useless in the prevention of crime. Thus, supporters of the due process system continue to strive to keep gun restrictions to a safe and constitutional minimum. A Due Process Supporters View on Gun Control

The concern about gun control causes an uproar to many supporters of the due process system. First, many supporters argue that gun control restricts rights given to the people of the United States, by the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms). They argue, that if strong gun control laws were to be placed there would be a likely possibility for those laws to be claimed unconstitutional and a reevaluation of the law would have to occur. Second, the tense topic “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is raised. Believers of this often insist on evaluating how gun control

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henceforth Mr. Wilson objectively defines his expectations and the serious needed precautions dealing with America’s constitutional amendment, yet fails to illustrate how to enforce the searching of firearms, by officers who are reluctant to frisk. Furthermore by…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper I will summarize the article and give an analysis of the topic of gun control and the decision the senate was faced with to either expand it or leave the current amendment in place.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    S. V Cruikshank Case

    • 3244 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights was an elaborate document for its time. This document was the beginning of a revolutionary country, one that was formed from brave men and women who gave their lives so that we the people of the United States may live in a free nation today. The framers of the United States Constitution were all very intelligent men and knew what it would take to create and keep a strong free society. That is why the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution gives the people of the United States the right to bear arms. In this paper I am going to discuss and validate the American people’s right to maintain firearms for their own personal protection.…

    • 3244 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article “Both Sides Are Wrong on the Gun Debate. Here’s Why” states that one side assumes that everyone has the right to defend themselves from criminals but the other side wants to regulate and ban guns. The author point out this issue begins in the constitution with the Second Amendment that protects citizen’s right. Therefore, officials need to be careful on upcoming gun laws, even background checks, since it will target most gun owners in the US. The author is skeptical of both sides of the argument on the issue of gun control. However, some points support the thesis that background checks should be established as a law…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to an article titled (Gun Debate: Where Is the Middle Ground?) written by Mallory Simon, writer and senior producer of online presentations for the Cable News Network (CNN) on January 31, 2013, the argument can be presented that “Guns don’t kill people, people do.” The article highlighted the common topic of gun control. In that phrase alone it is proposed that somehow guns have a mind of their own and can somehow control themselves. The author presents the proposal that somehow there may be a common ground in maintaining the use and sanction of guns in our country by creating a medium of strict public policy in the form of background checks and security. It is with strong supported evidence that an attempt will be made to argue that the power to control the illegal, malicious and careless use of guns is to limit the power of people to obtain them with a…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Debacles

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    The purpose of this paper will give a historical background of the gun control debacles in the United States, and will focus on gun control and the Second Amendment, the historical context of the Second Amendment and the legitimacy of gun the control legislation, America’s most dominant gun control movements since 1980, as well as presenting the effects they have had on the American public by analyzing different approaches state-by-state across the U.S., to understand if there is a correlation between the number of firearms, and killings committed by guns.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In fact, individuals seek support of police and criminal justice agencies to resolve matters that would be resolved in the past using individual weaponry. Opponents of gun control argue that these rights are essential. Advocates of gun control have argued that there is a definitive need for greater management of access to guns, while those opposed to gun control often cite the Second Amendment as the underlying principle for maintaining…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control and the Second Amendment have been in the new and at the forefront of American conversation in the last several months. The largest topic in this discussion is, what does the Second Amendment say, what does it mean, and does it still apply today. The main viewpoints of this argument really come from each group’s interpretation of the verbiage that makes up the Second Amendment. One group takes a universal human right to bear arms approach, while another group takes an approach that makes the Second Amendment a propositional statement.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Until today, Americans have not reached consensus on gun-control laws. People who disagree with stricter laws have been saying that "more guns help protect citizens" because with guns they can defend themselves. However, people who support more restrictive regulations claim that loose gun-control leads to an insecure society ("Gun Control"). Because both sides have persuasive reasons for or against gun-control laws, we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies demonstrate that expanding legal access to weapons results in fewer crimes yet liberals push firearm control on the grounds that it builds the reliance of voters on government for assurance and protection. The political impact of firearm control is to move voters leftward, and henceforth the essential people who support gun control are the liberal media and radical politicians. Gun control is limitation or denial by the government of the privilege to armed self-defense, as assured by the Second Amendment of the United States of America Constitution. Genocide had happened when gun control initially disarmed the…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently over the past few months the case for and the strength of having stricter gun control laws has become a household debate. The facts given in my research will point out the views from both sides of the proverbial coin, and show how gun control in America does not belong in legislature. There are many issues Americans are fighting to uphold; many think tightening gun control laws are unconstitutional and violate our Second Amendment rights, others think tightening gun control laws would make America safer.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Troy Bowdish P.6 4/11/18 Argumentative Essay Gun Control Gun control is an extremely controversial topic that really came into play in 2018. Some people say gun control is going to be the only way to stop mass shootings in the U.S., while others disagree and think gun control is considered unconstitutional because it would be voiding our 2nd Amendment right, “The right to bear arms.” Americans should have stricter gun control laws because gun control should become institutionalized which would lower crime rate, limit the ways felons can get ahold of guns, and decrease the amount of mass shootings across the US drastically; however, some people might disagree because they think it’s unconstitutional or that it would violate our…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns have been an important part of the United States of America’s history. This right is part of the Second Amendment which was inserted into the United States Constitution on December 15,1791 with the purpose of giving the people the right to bear arms. Currently gun control is a controversial topic in the United States, and a great part of the population demand more gun control laws; people believe that guns are the cause for crimes and schools tragedies like Columbine. I believe and I will demonstrate that guns are not the problem, and that guns also save vulnerable people, so creating stricter laws does not reduce crimes.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate over gun control continues to plague our country. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is the Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. The Brady Administration passed a bill that requires individuals seeking to buy a gun at a licensed dealer pass a background check. Because guns are especially lethal weapons, it makes sense that before someone can own one, he or she meets the legal requirements for ownership. This simple step protects everyone, gun owners and non-gun owners, from the danger of high-risk people gaining access to lethal weapons. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays