The concern about gun control causes an uproar to many supporters of the due process system. First, many supporters argue that gun control restricts rights given to the people of the United States, by the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms). They argue, that if strong gun control laws were to be placed there would be a likely possibility for those laws to be claimed unconstitutional and a reevaluation of the law would have to occur. Second, the tense topic “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is raised. Believers of this often insist on evaluating how gun control laws have previously affected crime rates. When data is evaluated the reality of it is, crime rates don’t go down when gun control restrictions are increased. Most believe that bad people will find other ways to get a gun. Finally, due process supporters state that by creating strict gun control laws you are restricting law abiding citizens from engaging in many activities. For many, guns are a major part of their lifestyle, for example; hunting and sport shooting. These people are abiding by all the rules and regulations, therefore by restricting them from using guns it would be useless in the prevention of crime. Thus, supporters of the due process system continue to strive to keep gun restrictions to a safe and constitutional minimum. A Due Process Supporters View on Gun Control
The concern about gun control causes an uproar to many supporters of the due process system. First, many supporters argue that gun control restricts rights given to the people of the United States, by the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms). They argue, that if strong gun control laws were to be placed there would be a likely possibility for those laws to be claimed unconstitutional and a reevaluation of the law would have to occur. Second, the tense topic “guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is raised. Believers of this often insist on evaluating how gun control