The first pathological form that results from the division of labor, according to Durkheim, is the anomic division of labor. This fairly common, negative aspect of the division of labor occurs when the individuals become isolated by their repetitive, specialized tasks, and forget that they are parts of the whole, i.e. society. Examples of this occur in industries and factories which detach workers from their employers. In order to fix this anomic division of labor, the conditions present in a state of organic solidarity must be determined. This state of interdependency would exist once the specialized workers became directly dependent on one another. This would form a complex division of labor strongly resembling an organism. The groups of people would act as organs engaging in repetitive, definite actions which contribute essential functions to the entire organism. When this state of organic solidarity is formed, problems such as anomie are rectified.
David Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist most famous for his book The Division of Labour In Society. Durkheim was considered a prodigy while he was in school. The main objective of the book was to explain the relationship between an individual and social solidarity. The chapter looked into his other works and the theories he developed. The “Division of Labour” was an important theme that Durkheim went into extreme detail with. He believed that by changing the “division of labour”, you could change the way that society had order and how unified everyone was. He also believed that the way that people cooperated with one another determined how smoothly things ran with the “division of labour”
Mechanical and Organic solidarity are two concepts of social solidarity that was coined by Durkheim. Mechanical solidarity deals with smaller societies with little division of labour and it is based on likeness. Organic solidarity deals with the opposite of Mechanical solidarity. It deals with the division of labour directly and it deals with larger societies. Mechanical societies have become rare in the world that we live in due to the development of the nations of the world.
The chapter also talks about the abnormal forms of the Division of Labour. The first example is know as an anomie, which refers to the the industrial and commercial crises and bankruptcies that represent a lack of adjustment in the division of labour. (Bratton, Denham, Deutschmann 149). An example of an anomie is the crisis that happened with the Big Three when they needed to be bailed out in order to be at a sustainable level. Anomies exists in the corporate world and in the industrial factory system.
The second abnormal division of labour is the forced division of labour. Forced division of labour focuses on structural inequalities. Because of the different social classes, people who are in a lower class will not receive the same type of opportunities. Because of inheritance, people who are undeserving of wealth will receive all of the advantages that people who are deserving wont. Durkheim suggests that inheritance should be eliminated in order to give everyone an equal opportunities. He suggests that the the wealth should be sent to corporations so everything would be fair.
Sacred and Profane
For Durkheim, religion is about the separation of the sacred from the profane. The sacred refers to those collective representations that are set apart from society, or that which transcends the humdrum of everyday life. The profane, on the other hand, is everything else, all those mundane things like our jobs, our bills, and our rush hour commute. Religion is the practice of marking off and maintaining distance between these two realms. Rituals, for example, reaffirm the meaning of the sacred by acknowledging its separateness, such as when religious devotees pray to a particular statue or symbol.
In "The Genesis of the Notion of the Totemic Principle or Mana" (in The ElementaryForms of Religious Life) sociologist Emile Durkheim uses the example of the Australian aborigines to explain the manner in which sacred or profane things are awarded their status. According to Durkheim, the aborigines divided their time between their daily activates in small groups that were predominantly concerned with meeting their survival needs, and times in which the whole clan was assembled. The excitement of these gathering led to extraordinary behavior such as dance, masks and ecstasy.
Durkheim stresses the gap between routine daily life and the exciting social events. In these ritualistic gatherings, Durkheim holds, the distinction between sacredness and profanity was formed in people's minds. Sanctity was present in other times and places, as did the religion's impositions, but its most forceful appearance was in social gatherings which led society to the idea that there are outer forces which control their lives.
For the Australian aborigines, Durkheim holds, these outer forces took the shape of the totem that served as the clan's name, symbol and "flag". For Durkheim, the symbolic meanings of the totem consolidate the sentiments invested with it in the social gathering, thus allowing them to exist even after the ritualistic gathering has concluded. This process of symbolizing is for Durkheim the genesis of religious life and the fundamental form of culture. For Durkheim, religion is the source for all other human cultural formation such as law and arts as well as material practices such as science and industry. In the fourth part of "The Genesis of the Notion of the Totemic Principle or Mana" Durkheim describes the believer's relation to the totem as a relation to "an older brother", and he rules out the notion of prunus in orbe dues fecit temor – that fear created the gods. According to Durkheim: "the primitive did not see his gods as strangers, enemies, or essentially and necessarily malevolent beings whose favour he had to curry at all costs. On the contrary, to him the gods were friends, relations and natural protectors… "jealous and trrible gods appear only later in religious development"
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
One of Durkheim’s major works was a Book called ‘The division of labor in society’. This is known as one of his most famous books, as it includes some key elements of his sociological thoughts. In this book, Durkheim wrote about the differences within traditional and modern societies. He describes traditional societies as having a low division of labor in society- resulting in mechanical solidarity. This is a term that Durkheim used to explain small compact and quite simple societies such as small rural villages, where there was a strong…
- 1548 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who felt that modernization occurred because of an increase in “specialized economic activity” (Macionis, 2006). His theory suggests that in years past, the traditional members of society all shared the same activities. Tasks such as farming, fishing, and cooking, gathering wood and gathering water were many of the shared activities of a community in the past centuries.…
- 1155 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Durkheim lived from 1858 – 1917, and was a key actor both in the foundation of sociology, social science and, as is contextually synonymous, in the…
- 1696 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1. According to Durkheim, what are the primary causes of the division of labor in general?…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Durkheim: Thank you, and welcome. The reason we are here today is that many social changes are currently observed in the today 's society (Dunman 2003). The industrialisation and modernisation of society has the tendency to free people of their restraints (Vold et al 2002, pp.100). Traditional or organic societies directed people to control their desires and ambitions, however as a positivist I believe that modern (mechanic) societies 'separate people and weaken social bonds as a result of the increased complexity and the division of labour '. This is evident in modern society further divided by beaucracy and specialisation in the workforce (Vold et al 2002, p.102). All these changes of the traditional society expose it to lack of regulation,…
- 1936 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
| French sociologist Emile Durkheim observed that rapid social change and a more specialized division of labor produce strain in society; these strains lead to a breakdown in traditional organization, values, and authority and to a dramatic increase in:…
- 2095 Words
- 9 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Collins Dictionary of Sociology, p406 adapted from S. Lukes, Emile Durkheim: His life and Work (1973) London:Allen Lane Museum of Natural History…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
One of Durkheim’s main functions was ‘social solidarity.’ Social solidarity means ‘social unity’ what’s meant by this is that society should have a sense of solidarity. Individual members must feel themselves to become a part of a community. Durkheim believes that the education system helps to creates social solidarity by transmitting society’s culture. He believes the education system does this by teaching children about a country’s history, he believes this instils in children a sense of a shared heritage and a commitment to the wider social group. Durkheim believes that social solidarity is good because he believes that it creates a stronger society, knowing about the different norms and values that are considered vital in society.…
- 344 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Durkheim argues that society needs a sense of solidarity. This is where each individual member feels that they belong to a community or make up a single part of a ‘body’. He also argues that without social…
- 507 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Durkheim discusses the aspects of organic and mechanical solidarity. He explains that individuals of a small society share similar norms, values, beliefs, culture and engage in similar economic occupations. Therefore there is more consensus seen here. This is found in a mechanical society. Whereas in an organic society where diversity in economic roles occur the norms and values differ and individualistic interests are more prevalent.…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Jessica McLemore Professor Karageorgis Soc 368 18 April 2018 DURKHEIM vs. SIMMEL Durkheim applied the theory of functionalism which was very different from other sociologists such as Marx and Weber who were propagating the theories of conflict of interest. Durkheim explained that harmony was the best form of defining the society as opposed to conflict. Durkheim looked at the functions of the social objects and what the social phenomenon does to facilitate and produce social cohesion. From the perspective of social objects, he was able to study concepts such as the division of labor, religion, and suicide (Durkheim 108). Simmel wrote insightful essays regarding social and personal interaction which were useful in developing qualitative…
- 1262 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Before determining the more better form of division of labor, we must define and contrast both from one another. The social division of labor is mainly recognized as a characteristic of all societies, derivative of the specific character of human work,and is known to subdivide society (50). It was determined that each individual human is unable to produce in the accordance with the standard of every species. However, the…
- 1648 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Proletariat is barely making enough to live a decent life, while the bourgeoisie is living in complete excess. This concept of alienation is very similar to Durkheim’s concept of anomie. He specifically looked at this in his work “Suicide”. This division of labor can lead to intense feelings of anomie. This comes in the form of lack of integration among society and lack of moral regulation.…
- 1607 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
We share our work and this division of work leads to our dependency on other people working in different roles. In every walk of our lives, we have to depend on others apart from our family members. For example, the cobbler repairs shoes for us, the barber cuts our hair, tailor stitches fashionable clothes for us, butcher cuts meat for us, bakers prepares biscuits for us, engineers make houses for us, etc. All these individuals fall into a community, without whom our lives will be very difficult. Division of work is,…
- 477 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays