Preview

Duty In Immanuel Kant's Groundwork

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
221 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Duty In Immanuel Kant's Groundwork
In Immanuel Kant's excerpt “Groundwork” he explains the difference between acting from duty as well as acting from a selfish view. Kant uses the example of a car dealer or mechanic overcharging an inexperienced purchaser, opposed to keeping a fixed price for everyone so that everyone can be treated as equal. According to Kant the person who does not act from duty does things for their own selfish benefits and reasons. In which the car dealer does since they know that they can take complete advantage of the purchaser.

To further his explanation, Kant begins the passage by explaining that the First Proposition of Morality is that “an action must be done from a sense of duty, if it is to have moral worth.” He now explains a situation where

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To followers of this theory the act itself must be morally right. It is for this reason that the deontological perspective would be considered one of ethical absolutism or objectivism, rather than ethical relativism. In this case, supporters of Kant’s theory would argue that there are moral rules which hold for all persons in all situations, and which allow for no exception. They might even take this…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Kant’s argument he argues that any action taken against another person to which the person could not consent violates the perfect duty explained in the second formulation. If a thief were to steal a book from a stranger, it may have been that the stranger would have consented to it, if he was asked by the thief. However, no one can consent to theft, because consenting would mean the transfer of items was not a theft, because the victim couldn’t have consented to the action, it could not be categorize as a universal law of nature, and theft opposes perfect duty. c. Gensler appeals to arguments like this:!!!…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lastly he states, “Duty is the necessity of an action done out of respect for the law.” One should act out of respect for the reason everyone could act on that maxim. One should act as an equal to when reasoning if the action is something everyone would act on. Again in the grocery store owner example he must treat all customers fairly because the maxim says he must obey this. One cannot make an exception for themselves and think they are higher than anyone else; the action needs to be consistent for every…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The word Deon is the Greek word for “duty” which is the central focus on Kant’s moral reasoning. It is the fulfillment of one’s moral duties and obligations to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do by the use of reason, logic, critical thinking and moral intuition, the moral duty to just do the right thing. The main ethical reasoning of Kant’s deontological ethics is based upon the concepts of duty and goodwill, the intention to do the right thing because it is the right thing to do which should be based on consistent and logical thinking and putting aside our personal interests and…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Immanuel Kant, guilt is considered a necessary condition for punishment and judicial punishment can never be used merely as a means to promote some other good for the criminal himself or civil society. He argues that, an offender must first be found to be deserving of punishment before any consideration is given to the utility of punishment for himself or his fellow citizens. In this view, utilitarian concerns can never justify the punishment of an innocent person while guilt itself demands punishment even where punishment is entirely devoid of social utility. Therefore, again we observe that the best action is the one that maximizes utility and can be applied in various ways, but most commonly relates to the maintenance of healthy emotional…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believed that our actions must come from a sense of Duty, not because we care for or love one another but because it is our Duty to “respect the Moral Law” (p. 246). Judging the importance of a decision based on whether or not it was following a rule or set of rules is called deontological ethics. He believed that it was not the consequences of the action which were important but the person’s motive carrying out the said action. Many disagree with Kant saying that we must have a foundation to start from, a reason such as love or concern to do what is morally…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant believed that we could act on desires or on reason. He used the case of a shopkeeper and a reluctant benefactor to illustrate this. In the case of the shopkeeper, the shopkeeper’s purpose was to make an easy profit and his means of doing so was to shortchange his customers. His actions were not done out of duty but out of self-interest. He says, “Hence the action was done neither from duty nor from immediate inclination, but merely for a selfish purpose”(986). In contrast, the reluctant benefactor—being a person that has no desire to act on something—just does it because it’s the right thing to do.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The objectivist view criticises the practicality of Kant’s theory and negates the existence of any such thing as “duty”. Humans are granted the opportunity to make choices in order to achieve certain goals. Duty states that people “must” perform certain actions, but it can be argued that we don’t have to do anything except live and die. Therefore, our lives are governed by laws of causality rather than duty, as we live to pursue means to a certain desired end and not to fulfil one’s duty. We all have a choice. You only have to do something if you wish to achieve something else, for example you need to work hard…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant’s diagnoses the human condition as human’s frailty and impurity when distinguishing between one’s self interested inclinations and moral duty. Humans were “…finite beings with our individual needs…yet we [were] also rational beings, and for Kant that include[d]…the recognition of moral obligations” (Stevenson and Haberman p.155). The contrast and ever-apparent strain between these opposing sides of human nature fuel Kant’s diagnosis of human’s frailty. In Kant’s conception of human reason and action, he distinguished between categorical and hypothetical imperatives which displayed the human struggles regarding what decisions were morally right. Self interested desires, “…which involve[ed] only the selection of means to satisfy one’s own desire” (p.151) could be defined as a hypothetical imperative. However, categorical imperative claims “…that morality is fundamentally a function of [one’s] reason, not just [one’s] feelings” (p.151). Knowing what was morally right and doing what was morally right was the depravity of human nature, the choice of choosing one’s own happiness over their obligations to those who surround them. The desire for instant gratification from any action hinders human’s consideration of longer-term self-interest. The difficulty arises when the one must decide to postpone immediate satisfaction in the interest of future goals; a “…balance to strike between living for the moment and planning for the future….” (p.155) must be reached. Human’s struggles with moral decisions and personal gain exemplify their…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems that Kant has a much more conservative view towards lying and when it is permissible. Grotius has a much more liberal, modern, and understanding view on the issue. Kant pretty much thinks that it is one's duty to speak the truth, although this moral principle is not taken unconditionally in the world today. This is a duty because it is every man's right to know the truth and lying to anyone would be taking this right away, which mortals should not have the power to do. However, if a man throws this right away, through committing evil acts that are opposed to the good of mankind, he no longer has a right to the truth and he can be lied to. Also, if a one forces another man to speak, the man has no duty to tell the truth, because…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Kant's Duty

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kant holds the position that as long as one does not violate the rights of others man is a free agent. Despite this man cannot use his own freedom to destroy himself. Kant believes that it is one’s duty to preserve their life and by willfully taking their life they are doing the opposite of this. This is seen in the quote “The first, not principal, duty of a human being to himself as an animal being is to preserve himself in his animal nature. The contrary to this is willful physical death or killing oneself.”(Kant 1996 p. 176). Another duty Kant mentions that man must abide by is the duty to uphold one’s dignity. By a human being taking their own life they are violating this duty of maintaining their dignity. Moreover, he claims that by committing…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant created a handful of formulations regarding his system of determining morality, the Categorical Imperative. James and Stuart Rachels in The Elements of Moral Philosophy, illuminate Kant's first and second Categorical Imperatives. While Kant claims the formulations are equivalent, they offer differing guidelines on how the Categorical Imperative is operated. Although the formulations share the same basis, the difference regarding how the formulations are adhered, is a large distinction difficult to ignore, and renders the two versions as separate subjects.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays