Preview

Dwight Shute Cohesiveness In The Office

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1172 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dwight Shute Cohesiveness In The Office
Group Case Study: The Office Introduction: Our small group was asked to watch two episodes of The Office season 9 episodes 16 and 17. We were then asked to negotiate as a group and come to a consensus about the following questions.
1. Define The Group Roles In The Office.
Many Different roles are played around the office, from the episodes we watched and the characters we got to know, they have many different roles.
Dwight Schute- Dwight is many things, he is a dominator in the sense that he “takes control” of his groups. He is also a Blocker, he is negative and stubborn for no apparent reason. We feel he is also somewhat of a group observer, lets everyone know what’s going right or wrong.
Pam Halpert- Definitely the Encourager she confirms the value of other people and ideas they
…show more content…

For example, cohesiveness is seen when Jim obtains Pam an interview in the same city he is in. It seemed their goal was to get her to Philadelphia so that they could be together. In the end she did not take the job that she knew was not right for her and could not stay even though she wanted too. Put in this same situation, I would have made the same choice. Another example of cohesiveness is seen when everyone in the office is aware of Meredith and Pete dating but Andy is left out of the loop. Everyone seems to agree that they make a good couple and kept it a secret to spare Andy’s feelings. In this instance, I would have minded my own business too. I make it a point not to get involved in others personal relationships. In another example, the group appeared to all be in agreement on how to handle a situation when they decide, as a group, not to partake in the cupcakes by a former coworker. But nobody keeps their word and they eat the tainted cupcakes backfiring on them all. In general, I have found that going along with what the majority want, in an office setting, makes for a much easier work

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Callaway , M. R. , & Esser, J. K. . (1984). Groupthink: effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(2), 157-164.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dwight works at a paper company and his position mainly consist of sales. He also owns a family farm where he grows beats. Dwight has been assigned 20 hours of therapy because of dangerous and harassing behavior on his work place. This disturbing behavior was especially towards one of his co-workers named Jim Harpert. Reportedly, Dwight had put Jim Harpers desk on fire, unfortunately ending up burning down his own desk too.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our company is one of those believers in teamwork but Hackman argues that most company has misconceptions on teamwork. The first misconception that Hackman mentions is on “harmony.” Many companies feels that if a team has smooth interaction it would avoid wasting time and having debates on how to proceed. (Hackman, 2011) According to Hackman (2011), “Conflict, when well managed and focused on a team’s objectives, can generate more creative solutions than one sees in conflict-free groups.” Conflict and constructive criticism seems to bring out great ideas and help see more than one point of view. The second misconception that Hackman mention was “mixing it up.” According to Hackman (2011), the longer members stay together as an intact group, the better they do. As an employee who participates in groups it easier to continue to work with the same people because you get to know and learn the people in the group which helps with knowing their triggers and fuses. When adding new people to an existing group or changing team could possibly prolong the project because now that team has to reacquaint themselves with each other as well…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary threat to sound decision making and problem solving with a group that experiences extreme cohesiveness is a phenomenon called groupthink.…

    • 961 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order for this team to increase group cohesion, there would actually have to be a group discussion. This team needs to start communicating and discussing what needs to be discussed. Because of the other members not actively participating in this discussion it made it hard to do this assignment. I will hope for a better team discussion next week.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ratzburg, Wilf H.. (n.d.). Group Cohesiveness. In Organizational Behavior. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www.geocities.com/athens/forum/1650/htmlgroups18.html.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of a group is “two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 277). As a group, you can either work together well, or poorly. Groups can appoint individual members to certain parts of assignments, or individual tasks and then collaborate later together in a group discussion. This can cause functional or dysfunctional conflict. Functional conflict can be worked through even when individuals have different points of view (conflict). Dysfunctional conflict however, can ruin the integrity of the group and cause extreme conflicts. “One researcher says that the problems of brainstorming demonstrate the problems of groups. If you leave groups to their own devices, he says, they’re going to do a very miserable job” (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 278).…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For group cohesiveness there are four strategies: Composition, Individual Benefits, Task Effectiveness and communication. I believe our group can effectively use these four strategies to help our group.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Childcare Level 3 Unit 5

    • 3831 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The norms of working in a group are that you have shared values and shared behaviours, and if everyone shared these norms in a working environment it would make your job a lot easier. Working…

    • 3831 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Group Roles

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Follows orders carefully and does assigned tasks or routine chores no one else wants to do; goes along with group consensus…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Office Space Leaders

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Office Space" is a movie filled with bad leaders. Most of the characters put in leadership roles got there probably through a college degree. The best leader in the movie is a man who rarely shows up for work and masterminds a plot to steal the company's money.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Office Space is a great example of irrational management and bizarre human behavior. The staring character is Peter Gibbon. He is a computer programmer who is trying to find meaning to his life. He is completely dissatisfied with his job and wishes a greater meaning to his life. He almost always arrives late to work and is very annoyed by his co-workers. He has two friends in the office: Zamir and Michael. Zamir an Islamic immigrant takes great pride in his work and is very proud to about the opportunities that the United States has given him. Michael is extremely skeptical, cynical, and lacking pride in his work and in himself. Everyone in the office struggles to find job satisfaction in their air-conditioned cubicles (Judge).…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Team That Wasn't

    • 3337 Words
    • 14 Pages

    the tension level becoming unbearable. Six of the top-level managers involved seemed determined to turn the company around, but the seventh seemed equally determined to sabotage the process. Forget camaraderie. There had been duee mcet~ iogs so far, and Eric hadn't even been able to get everyone on the same side of an issue. Eric stepped inside his apartment and checked tbe clock: only three more hours before he had to watch as Randy Louderback, FireArt's charismatic director of sales and marketing, either dominated the group's discussion or withdrew en· tirely, tapping his pen on the table to indicate his boredom. Sometimes he withheld information vital to the group's debate; otber times be coolly denigrated people's comments. Still, Eric realized, Randy held the group in such thrall because of his dynamic personality, his…

    • 3337 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    relationship of cohesion or antagonism: even though you are located at different sectors (levels) within the organization individuals create personal relationships of sympathy or antipathy whose duration or intensity may vary.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay on Peer Pressure

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I was a long time meeting and in this the full office staffs were involve all the staffs were equally divided according to there interest and work.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays