Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Dworkin's Third Conception of the Law and Hart's Criticism

Good Essays
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dworkin's Third Conception of the Law and Hart's Criticism
PART TWO - ESSAY

(1) Dworkin’s “third conception of the law” called Law as Integrity is based in part on the assumption that there is a single author of the law. The community personifies expressing a coherent conception of justice and fairness. According to law as integrity, propositions of law are true if they figure in or follow from the principles of justice, fairness, ad procedural due process that provide the best constructive interpretation of the community’s legal practice. Furthermore, Dworkin would approve and support the judges for creating an opinion and setting a new precedent on this case. Dworkin’s Chain Novel concept fits into this case perfectly by adding new precedent which the lawmakers of the time could not foresee. The lawmakers had not created such a provision dealing with this situation but surely did not intend to protect this defendant just because the language of the law was absent.

(2) Hart might criticize the majority opinion because he will believe that the justices have done a dishonor to the law. Regardless if the defendant attained the land through unmoral means, he did not violate any laws at that time. Social rules should not be taken into consideration with the law since there is no precedent dealing with such issue. A law is separate from morality, and does not in itself guarantee that the primary social rules of a given legal system are just or morally right (Adams 43). The majority opinion relied on judges to go beyond their jurisdiction and make moral judgments when there was no such precedent or law set on that matter. The judges, as Hart may claim, did not follow primary and secondary rules in reaching their majority opinion. Hart may support the dissent of Judge Gray by applauding Grays reasoning on the case. In particular, Hart would support Gray when Gray states, “The question we are dealing with is whether a testamentary disposition can be altered, or a will revoked, after the testators death, through an appeal to the courts, when the legislature has by its enactments prescribed exactly when and how wills may be made, altered, and revoked, and apparently, as it seems to me, when they have been fully complied with, has no left room for the exercise of an equitable jurisdiction by the courts over such matters. (Adams 152).” Hart would support this train of thought by Gray because Gray clearly makes it known to the majority that there are already laws stating how to properly handle wills, and that the courts really have no jurisdiction after a testator has deceased and the will has come into affect. Gray is only following the law and keeping morality separate.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rochin Case Summary

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is hard to tell what the future holds in respect to the justice system since it is not often determined by one’s intentions, but the events people encounter as they purse their goals. Therefore, the decision of this case may affect a criminal justice professional I the sense he or she might want to maintain a strong and focused philosophy. This may involve the consideration of both crime control and due process models when dealing with some cases because the use of the two appears to be the best strategy to deal with crime in the…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian legal system doesn't deliver justice equally for all Australians. In this essay, the issues of the relationship between laws to ethics, morals and values, access to the legal system and issues of fairness in the law will be discussed. There are several relevant examples that have influenced the viewpoint of this essay. The case of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, the case of Amy vs Adam (www.lawcouncil.asn.au) and the case of Brendan Dassey.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals overlook the importance of legal history because the central emphasis is on the current state of law. It is vital to recognize that today’s equitable judicial system was not formed through one rapid notion but rather many unconventional propositions extending over a period of…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trayvon Martin Case Study

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    cast the case in such a light, however, the basis for law itself – which we have already…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Davis Case

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Davis argues generally that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to correct an illegal sentence, we discern from his brief two specific arguments as to why the circuit court should have granted his motion to correct an illegal sentence. First, Davis asserts that “Count 1-Robbery with a Dangerous and Deadly weapon, Count two First Degree Assault, [and] Count 8 Use of a Handgun in the Commission of violence” should merge. Secondly, Davis contends that he was deprived of procedural due process when his motion to correct an illegal sentence was denied without a hearing, without having given Davis the opportunity to respond to the States opposition to Davis’s motion, and without the trial judge having sufficiently articulate…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bonsigmore, J. (2006). Before the Law; An Introduction to the Legal Process. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.</p>…

    • 1489 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crime and Process Model

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Court reform is a topic of constant conversation in legal circles. Do a search on the topic by going to Yahoo: http://www.yahoo.com. Then, under Search, type the phrase court reform. Is court reform needed to protect the values of the crime control model or the values of the due process model?”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When looking at leadership from a trait approach, several solid characteristics exist. One of those characteristics is personality. Personality is important especially in the work place and can set the tone of the environment. For example, if a manager/leader has a positive attitude and approach to employees during a situation then the outcome will be positive. When employees are happy and working in positive atmosphere achievements and goals are accomplished. An additional strength of the trait approach is that the approach provides a deep understanding of what makes an individual successful as a leader. This will help future theorists because he or she will have a list of traits that predict leadership.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 6 Assignment

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Source: Fuller, L. (1975). The morality of law. (p. 159). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.…

    • 834 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is a very rigid side of law that is blind to circumstance and individual cases. Substantive law on the other hand is how the law is actually applied and enforced. Since it cannot be avoided substantive law usually has some discretion of legal actors involved in the process such as police, judges and as discussed this far, juries. Jury nullification perhaps creates the biggest gap between substantive and formal law as it is subverting the rules of formal law in a legal case and so it becomes substantive law. The problem with this is that formal law likes to treat everyone as equals, rule like cases similarly and be as predictable and reliable as possible. With jury nullification law potentially loses many of these aspects in favour of treating cases involving different individuals and circumstances differently with no rule of precedent being set. This paper asserts that substantive law being different from formal law is not a bad thing; rather it makes law less alienating and daunting to an individual. Real justice, as mentioned earlier in the paper is not simply meeting a status quo. Real justice ought to be for the people and community that fund it with their tax dollars and that it was created to serve. Justice is not being done if it is simply used by legal actors to swallow people up into a system that makes it very hard for them to find work and gain trust once they get out. Also although equality is important it does not exist in society regardless so to maintain that justice without nullification is equal is simply false. Leroy Reed’s case was not the same as other cases of a similar nature and should not be treated as such, special circumstances should require the law to acknowledge the differences and treat the case differently. With this leaves quite a large gap in between what law is written down as and how it is practically applied, this could perhaps signal us that…

    • 2637 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Once More to the Lake

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    White says that he seemed to be living "a dual existence" as a father in the present and…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For instance, Dworkin looks towards John Austin's definition of a sovereign. Austin “defined a sovereign as some person or group whose commands are habitually obeyed and who is not in the habit of obeying anyone else.”, but as Dworkin added aspects of this definition have since been disregarded.20 The rule of recognition discussed by HLA Hart in Concepts of Law, argues that Austin's definition it now a two sided coin. On the one hand you have those who are in positions of power and make the law, but they are only empowered with this privelege by the sovereign will of the community at large.21 This duality ensures that judicial power is restrained because citizens would not respect the law if they believed it to be…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The term mechanical jurisprudence was coined by Roscoe pound in his article in 1908. It is the concept that judges apply law rigidly according to precedent and legislation without thought of consequences. In this it is argued that every eventuality that comes before the law is legislated for in advance, it is just for the judges to apply the relevant law. This concept would insinuate that every case that comes before the courts has been legislated for in advance, leaving virtually no room for judicial discretion.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Serial Murder Case Analysis

    • 2809 Words
    • 12 Pages

    How to successfully solve serial murder cases – ideas and discussion – Crimestoppers – key facts report.…

    • 2809 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics