Preview

Dysfunctional Lungs

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dysfunctional Lungs
There is a thin line between public health and an individual's freedom. However, the public should be able to do whatever one desires to do because it is part of our freedom. I believe people should not be able to choose and just follow the orders they are given to, for their health and the public's health. It has become a major debate where society speaks what the limit to someone's personal health should be. There are already restrictions which prevents people from having their full on freedom. For example, smoking is restricted in many places already where it can harm people the most, like in schools. It is humane to restrict smoking from school because the children are still developing, therefore; their lungs are still small and weak. This causes their lungs to be more available to any types of issues that come with receiving the smokers secondhand smoke. So, if this wasn’t a restriction that interfered with one's freedom, there would have been many kids right now with dysfunctional lungs because of all the …show more content…
There should be very good reasons for why the government restricts the people’s right to do what they desire. There has been wars over this, for people can gain their rights to do whatever they desire. It is not right to change this if it really does not impact other people,s health. One should be entitled to do whatever they want with their health because it is there body, however, stop when it starts to impact other humans. Whether all of society agrees to public health regulations or not, there will always be someone who will restrict their desires. They are restricted because it will start to cause a negative impact on majority of society and that is an inhumane thing to do. Therefore, it is great how there is now much more public health regulations for many humans can not get a negative impact on negative public

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the healthcare setting many clinicians are curious to know how airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) works. Many modes of ventilation have been developed throughout the years that focus on lung recruitment and allows for patients to breathe at a spontaneous rate. However, APRV is one of the many modes that concentrate on providing partial ventilatory assistance to patients with some form of respiratory failure. First, can APRV protect the lungs and reduce the work of breathing? Second, is APRV an effective mode of ventilation for patients that suffer from decreased lung compliance? These are just some of the questions physicians ask themselves when determining a method to ventilate their patients.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    HCA 415 Week 4 DQ 1

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Individual Rights versus Societal Rights . Prevention is a hallmark of public health. Primary prevention uses interventions such as ...…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By working within standards set out and within our own capacity we will prevent harm from occurring to ourselves, others and the individual. By giving an individual choice and respecting their views/wishes they know that their independence has not been taken from them, giving them more confidence if an issue of safeguarding etc. were to arise.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You may ask, why not force people to wear seatbelts if it saves lives? If we start forcing people to wear seatbelts then we should also start making people stay healthy since obesity is a major cause for dying young. Then after we force people to stay healthy why don't we put a ban on people having unprotected sex, because it can lead to diseases that could cause death. The list goes on and on of things the government can do to that would be good for our health and save our lives, but this country was established on the basis that we are free to endanger ourselves as long as we do not harm anyone else.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meanwhile, other healthcare sectors have more freedom to establish official goals and work within operational goals. The public sector does not allow for this liberty due in large part to public tax funding being allocated for operational public health…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America is recognized for its laws regarding freedom. By allowing smoking in public places, we are taking away the freedom of health from nonsmokers. Through banning areas where smoking is permitted, we limit freedoms of the smoker, but do not eliminate the freedom entirely. The ban would be seen more as a restriction on where these freedoms can be exercised to ensure well being for all people, smokers and nonsmokers. These limitations are for the good of the American people as a whole, which makes the ban an appropriate course of action.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UNIT 4222 304

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages

    By working within standards set out and within our own capacity we will prevent harm from occurring to ourselves, others and the individual. By giving an individual choice and respecting their views/wishes they know that their independence has not been taken from them, giving them more confidence if an issue of safeguarding etc. were to arise.…

    • 519 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government to some extent should protect us from unreasonable and preventable harms. Certain drugs are illegal. There are seatbelt and helmet laws. Gambling is heavily regulated. People cannot always make the most rational decisions and these decisions could have detrimental permanent effects on the lives of one.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the key agendas of the public health sectors in any country is to provide health care interventions that make a positive difference to the people and in a way that respects and values diversity of those people (UK DoH, 2004). The government has a responsibility to ensure that the rights of the different people groups are protected in the law, so that all the citizens in the society, especially the vulnerable groups are protected from discrimination (Woodward, 2010).…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autonomy

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Users of the health care system have the right to be treated with respect for their autonomy and not feel the powerful influence of the doctor over powering…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people think that restricting certain things such as smoking and driving certain cars that can increase pollution for the sake of other people's health is a restriction to our freedom, these people say that is their health and they should be allowed to. However when we analyze this actions we end up realising that said “freedom” is not really worth risking our health or even our lives. We focus so much on the negative that we forget the positive outcome not only to society but for ourselves as well. We overlook that reducing the spaces that allow people to smoke also reduces the victims of secondhand smoke and also keeps people that smoke from smoking more than they should and ending up getting addicted or with lung cancer, or that by regulating car pollution it prevents people from getting toxins in their lungs and die. When not only own own health but also other peoples is at stake, we must think of the greater good and realise that is way better to have less “freedom” than risking death because of the selfish act of…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the government have the right to interfere in people’s private lives? Democracy guarantees freedom. One might then argue that a government should allow people to act according to their own free will. But, there are always two sides to everything. Absolute independence might not lead to anything productive in a society like ours. There needs to be a basic framework of rules and guidelines in which all participants in society should agree to.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Should the government have the right to interfere in our private lives? Democracy guarantees freedom. One might then argue that a government should allow people to act according to their own free will. But there are two sides to every coin. Absolute independence might not lead to anything productive in an interdependent society as ours. There needs to be a basic framework of rules and guidelines to which all participants in that society agree to.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ielts Essay

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most fundamental duties of government is to ensure healthy life for every citizen. Though there are many arguments about whether state ought to spend more money for promoting healthy lifestyle or to treat already diseased people, I think government should determine the most cost effective ways to improve people's health by both promoting healthy lifestyle and treating ill.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    mullen

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages

    specifically on the purchase and consumption of consumer goods made for use on the body. It is…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays