Preview

Edmund Burke's Views On The French Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1005 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edmund Burke's Views On The French Revolution
The French Revolution (1789-1794), worked towards the end of feudalism in France by establishing nationalism and the French nation. The King, Louis XVI established the Estate General which included a lack of representation and un-proportioned Third Estate which included majority of the French Population. With the Enlightenment era at that time, the Third Estate formed the National Assembly and swore the Tennis Court Oath, vowing not to disperse until constitutional reform had been achieved. On August 4, 1789, the National Assembly passed the Declaration of the Rights of Men and Citizen, which resulted in the abolishment of the predominant feudal system in France. With the end of feudalism, there was a rise of liberalism and conservatism. This …show more content…
He was a founder and supporter of conservatism in England and in Europe. All of his views and ideas present in his “Reflections on the Revolution in France” (1790) are based on his conservative reasoning philosophy. He profoundly disagrees with the rationale presented in the Declaration of the Rights of Men and Citizen because he believes that all the rights are based on an abstract notion of Nation, and that common citizen cannot govern a monarchy. Lualdi aptly says, “He argued the case for tradition, continuity, and gradual reform based on practical experience—what he called “a sure principle of conservation.” Conservatism is based on the idea of monarchical tradition , which opposes the abstract idea of the citizens governing the nation. Conservatism emphasizes on the hereditary acquisition of prestige and command, and establishes that those people had the natural right to rule a “Nation”. The main difference, among some other views, between Burke and the French Revolutionaries is the ongoing conflict between liberalism and conservatism in the …show more content…
The declaration absolves the hereditary social distinctions that separated France to present all the citizens of France as equal, only to be distinguished based on the “the general good.” The first and most important article presents an enlightened idea, that it is man’s natural right to be free and man was born free, and that all men are equal under the law. It is followed by the next idea that, “The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man.” This means that the governance of these newly formed rights must be protected by all political entities and it is the government’s duty to look after the put everyone in accordance to it. Burke says, “government is not made in virtue of natural rights, which may and do exist in total independence of it.” He argues that the government is abstractly created on the bases of natural rights set by the respective nation. Thus his argument follows the notion that government should be based on tradition, that is the previous feudal system, as the upper classes, which previously governed under the rule of monarchy, have the means and experience to keep the continuity of the nation over a new inexperienced political class. He says that because he sees the French people destroy themselves as their leadership is filled with liberal and radical ideas, under the leadership of Maximilien

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Edmund Burke was a British statesman, parliamentary orator, and political thinker who played a significant role in all the major political issues of his time. Writing about a year after the French revolutionaries attacked Bastille, the "Reflections on the Revolution in France" by Burke was widely known for its attack on the principles that motivated one of the most remarkable events in western history. He became an important influence on classical conservatism since its creation in the year 1789. He was a firm believer of conservatism, even became an important influence on classical conservatism since its creation, and used this to support his claims in his critical analysis of the French Revolution.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Reflections of the Revolution in France, Edmund Burke intellectually attacks the French for the occurrences that took place in their country during the late 1700s. Burke was strongly opposed to immense political reform. In this book, he voices his belief that it is counteractive to try new types of government because it can lead to the loss of the progress achieved by the past generations. Thus, he argues that all men are subject to a generational contract that embodies beings from the past, present and the future. This is where I begin to have a problem with Burke’s argument because, as stated in Paine’s book The Rights of Man, old forms of government cannot keep up with new elements that come about with changing times; thus, civilians…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    00-Sep-2016 Asma Ahmed Bham Shaping Modernity - Essay Assignment “In what way does Burke’s speeches before Parliament reflect some of the ideas articulated by Rousseau in The Social Contract?” The social contract is about people exchanging their political freedom for protection from their ruling body. Going back to initial idea of the social contract by Thomas Hobbs, who talks about the relationship between the ruler and those they rule, says that there is an exchange between these two parties- freedoms for protection.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burke believed that living in a society, people have an equal opportunity to do anything for their self preservation and happiness as long as it does not interfere with that of others, and ‘‘in this partnership all men have equal rights, but not to equal things''. He also believed, however, that people have no right to that which can hurt them or is beyond reason. This is how he felt about the French revolution because he believed that it wouldn't lead to peace or democracy but to self destruction and anarchy.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perhaps one of the most influential figures during the French Revolution was a man by the name of Maximilien Robespierre. Instrumental especially at the onset of the Revolution, a period referred to as the Reign of Terror, Robespierre drew on the insights of many Enlightenment philosophers and was a strong advocate for the left wing bourgeoisie. However, despite his efficacious leadership and sentiment, much of what he encouraged to the masses is based off the writings and teachings of one Enlightenment thinker in particular: Jean Jacques Rousseau. Rousseau would be the first “modern critic of the bourgeois society.”[1]More specifically, in his text, The Social Contract[2], in which he outlines what he believes to be the necessary ingredients in creating stability in a commercial society that finds itself staring its problems right in the face. These ideas include, “Man is by nature good, but becomes corrupt through unjust institutions and laws; he is born free, but becomes a slave to injustice. Government is literally a contract entered into by people; each individual brings into the larger group a share of its power and authority. Moreover, the contract can be changed at any time the "general will" desires. Sovereignty rests in the general community and any executive power is merely subservient to the sovereign -- the people. The nation's will is expressed in law. But the individual is not to be placed above the state. In such cases where an opponent consistently resists or rejects the general will as expressed in law, Rousseau recommends death: ‘When the entire nation is in danger . . . a thing which is a crime at other times becomes a praiseworthy action. Lenience toward conspirators is treason against the people.’ The state can, at times, exercise tremendous power over the individual members: ‘The state, in regard to its members, is master of all their goods. The sovereign -- that is to say the people -- may legitimately take away the goods of everyone, as was…

    • 6580 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among the incivilities by which nations or individuals provoke and irritate each other, Mr. Burke’s pamphlet on the French Revolution is an extraordinary instance. Neither the People of France, nor the National Assembly, were troubling themselves about the affairs of England, or the English Parliament; and that Mr. Burke should commence an unprovoked attack upon them, both in Parliament and in public, is a conduct that cannot be pardoned on the score of manners, nor justified on that of policy. There is scarcely an epithet of abuse to be found in the English language, with which Mr. Burke has not loaded the French Nation and the National Assembly. Everything which rancour, prejudice, ignorance or knowledge could suggest, is poured forth in…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Paine and Burke

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This essay will examine the philosophical difference between Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine relating to the French and American Revolutions at the late Eighteenth Century. We are going to present a summary of the debate between these two different philosophers in the first part of this essay. The pros and cons of each man will be looked at in the second and third part of the essay and the final part of this essay will explain why Thomas Paine's view was more accepted and legitimate in America than Edmund Burke. In summary this essay will compare and contrast both Paine and Burke views of natural rights, human nature and the government.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The French Revolution became a pivotal moment in the history of governmental rule in the late eighteenth century. Two very educated men, Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine, gave their arguments on whether or not a revolution was necessary or acceptable due to the violation of rights. Burke, who believed in hereditary succession and traditional ways, opposed Paine who wanted citizens to have liberty under a just government. Together they justify their reasons on what they truly believed was the best interest of French citizens and pinpoint their arguments against one another for what they firmly believed would work.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the French Revolution, Jean-Jacques Rousseau had inspired many revolutionists on either side, including one Robespierre, though he may not have entirely agreed with them. Rousseau’s idea of a perfect government centered around the idea that it acted as an intermediary between the people and the sovereign. This paper will discuss what Rousseau may have thought about what Robespierre did with his power as well as the French Revolution.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the French Revolution, two writers created an important controversy: Thomas Paine and Edmund Burke. They represented two opposing ideologies: conservatism (Burke) and radical liberalism (Paine). The main idea of Burke was warning of the dangers of trying to shape society according to abstract concepts and ideals, and as a representative of traditional English Conservatism. For Paine, it was to foreseeing the welfare state.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Burke

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the time of the French Revolution, there was significant political and social turmoil between the Conservatives and Liberals. The controversy between these two opposing sides resulted in an intellectual and analytical war in France. Two citizens in particular, Edmund Burke and Mary Wollstonecraft, used the press as a means of spreading their ideas. Burke decided to write an essay called Reflections on the Revolution in France, which discussed his conservative views. Within a month of Burke’s essay being published, Mary Wollstonecraft decided to fight back and defend her liberalistic position by writing, A Vindication of the Right of Men. Throughout these two essays there are several key points in reference to inheritance of wealth, social class, equal rights, and enlightenment. Burke’s and Wollstonecraft’s pieces of literature refute each others views and beliefs by supporting and opposing France’s traditional conservative customs in its’ society.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socratic Dialogue

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages

    1790’s England, a conservative thinker (Henry) meets a pro-enlightenment thinker (Jean-Pierre)that is extremely supportive of the recent revolution in France. The conservative thinker has recently read Edmund Burkes text ‘Reflections on the Revolution in France’ and in very much in concurrence with it as well as Burke’s principles in general. Edmund Burke’s philosophy is largely a negative response to the French Revolution and disputes almost everything…

    • 2626 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The spirit of innovation thus, was predicted to bring destruction rather than progress as such spirit incited “personal pride and arrogance” (Burke, 46) in individuals, who clearly did not possess the rational capacity to develop political institutions on their own. On the other hand, nature on its own had brought progress to the civilization through natural inventions, which were otherwise unimaginable within the boundaries of human rationality (Burke, 33). Political institutions thus, had to be in “symmetry with the order of the world” (Burke, 34) that evolved in conjunction with nature. Burke perceived nature as an indefinite source of virtue and wisdom, the two essential principles in bringing progress to the civilization.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The French Revolution is arguably the most important event in Western history. It has been said that ‘Never was any such event so inevitable yet so completely unforseen’.” The events prior and during the French Revolution eventuated in the execution of the king and effectively the end of the monarchy as well as radical changes to the French hierarchy and society. Some may reason that King Louis XVI was in fact the most influential personality of the French Revolution. However Louis and his incompetence as a leader was merely the catalyst of the revolution and evidently the Reign of Terror which followed. Louis XVI, the final Bourbon king, and absolute monarch of France reigned from 1765 to 1793, during a time of great discontent in his country. The decision of his forefathers impacted greatly upon the rule of Louis XVI and the opinion of the lower classes. Evidently the people of France revolted against the monarchy which had ruled for over a thousand years and created the French Republic. With the revolution came great cultural, social, political and historical changes; a new national government was developed which stressed the importance of equality and Madame Guillotine was introduced to ensure justice. The revolution also saw a great shift in the hierarchal structure of France; people of the Third Estate, the French commoners and peasants were now highly influential in political decisions. Maximilien Robespierre arose from this Third Estate and effectively became the leader of the Revolution. Robespierre’s influence subsequently has become synonymous with the Reign of Terror and can be seen as the significant influence of French societal change during 1792 to 1795.…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays
    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays