At first blush, the statement seems compelling. One great purpose of education is instilling in students with experiences of elder generations after all. Young people, passionate, brave and innovative as they are, their naivety and lack of experience often make them mistakenly put too much energy on areas they’re unlikely to achieve success in the first place, waste the golden years and end up all the great talents and efforts in vain. Usually, it is hard for people to estimate their talents and abilities objectively at their juvenile ages when their minds are full of confidence and hearts desperate for success. Every year, thousands of hundreds of young people flock to Hollywood hoping to get auditions to show their talent and dream about overnight fame; likewise, the number of students joining the fierce competition of entering acting school continues to rise in recent years. However, most commonly, these passionate young people who are eager to pursuit a career of acting end up doing odd jobs in restaurants for a living. Supposing when receiving education, these young people have been carefully assessed and informed not having the qualities of becoming an actor; they would not be so keen at investing precious time and efforts on pursuing a career they’re not suitable with and may turn to other area which they show more capabilities on. Another common circumstance is that some fields of study themselves are not easy to make a difference or not worth working on; such as alchemy, inventing perpetual-motion machine and studying the origin of the universe in developing countries. At this time, young people need helps from instructors and schools to understand the situation clearly and avoid those areas which have reached to a dead end, so as not to waste their valuable youth times.
Beyond this concession, however, I disagree with the statement mainly because it actually implies that educational institutions should make choices relating students’ future career for them instead of letting them make their own choices. First, this policy would require that a society of parents make choices that they surely will never agree upon to begin with—for example, how and on what basis each student’s talents and abilities should be assessed, and which field of study is promising and most worth the society’s time and efforts. While society’s parents would never reach a reasonable consensus on these issues, it would be totally irresponsible to leave these choices to a handful of institutions and bureaucrats. After all, they are unlikely to have the best interests of the students in mind, and their choices would be tainted by their own quirky, biased and profit-oriented notions of how the student can be successful. Chances are these institutions will make the majority of its students into fields of study which are most popular currently in order to enhance the institutions’ reputation. If so, the policy will dwindle into tool for educational institutions to sacrifice its students’ interests in order to enlarge the institutions’ profits.
Even assuming both the institutions and bureaucrats puts students’ interests at first instead of being driven by its own profit when helping students choose their future career, I still disagree with the statement. One important reason is that whether people’s talent or society’s situation are both complicated things hard to be estimated; which means even the instructors are equipped with more experience and information, it is still unjustified that they will outsmart the students when concerning the students’ future. Great minds are always ahead of the times; genius artists and scientists usually cannot be recognized at a very young age—especially by their teachers. Einstein was considered dull and unpromising by his primary school teacher; Van Gogh’s painting was considered to be of no value in most of his lifetimes. Educational institutions evaluating students’ talent from a mundane piece of view may be counterproductive and at last leave students talent killed in the cradle. Similarly, people’s estimation on field of study worth putting efforts on can be of no accuracy as well. It is very much common that many researchers and projects which shows little value and hope at times turn out to be crucial foundations of great discovery and inventions in the future. Letting educational institutions choosing fields of study which its students are more easily to achieve success may cause the whole society turn to areas which can be achievement in a very short term and nobody will engage on studies such as art, history and theoretical science whose fruits are hard to gain immediately. Obviously this will eventually break the balance and threat the whole society.
Another reason I oppose to the statement is that the definition of success itself is vague and controversial. While some people reckon successful career as those who can bring them wealth and reputation, some may prefer occupation which can make them feel accomplished and fulfilled. Also a great amount of people like me expect jobs which are not so busy that can leave us free time to attend our families. Since people’s opinion on “successful career” is such complex and diversity, letting educational institutions make choice for young people’s future career based on their understanding of success does not make any sense. Moreover, people’s talents and abilities usually stretch out into various fields. Einstein the famous scientist is also an outstanding violinist; Da Vinci shows talents both on arts and autonomy. But at last people tend to choose the field which they have the most passion on as their lifelong career because usually people behave better on areas they’re most interested in. Supposing regardless of people’s will, we put Albert Einstein into a symphony for a living and let Da Vinci go to medical school in which he will not be distracted by all about painting; those people may as well be well-known or even richer, but will the world and the genius themselves be more pleasant?
In the final analysis, when we are helping young people plan their future career with experience and information brought by elder generations we’re all better off, only if we stick to the principle that the right to make choices about future career is held in the young people themselves’ hands. Through education we provide students with a value system and a set of logic to serve as compass, skills as well as knowledge to serve as ballast. But the ultimate purpose is to enable young people themselves holding the rudder of their life ship and sailing the way they wish.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Throughout almost everyone’s life, there is a focus on the future, more specifically in a future career. As young children, we have the hopes of being doctors, police officers, fairies, and princess. When we grow older we learn about the realities and the limits of our futures. We understand that we cannot be fairies or the Flash. However, the pressure to decide what to do in life is always there. A pressure which is the most prevalent in the first years of college. In “Major Decisions” by James Tunstead Burtchaell he explores the ways that picking a major in college is less of a pathway to a certain career, but more to wider possibilities in the future. The importance in not in the career that can be the final goal but rather the knowledge about…
- 461 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During the college years of a person’s life, some of the biggest and life changing decisions are made. The decision of choosing a college, picking a major, and then the pursuit of a career affect the rest of an individual’s life. College students often receive a great deal of advice, from many different people, concerning their career. There are many people that give the advice, “Do what you love,” while, in contrast, other people will give the advice, “Do what makes money.” These two pieces of advice are very conflicting and it brings up the argument - should you do what you love or what makes the money? For both sides of the argument, there is support and reasoning that is very valid and persuasive. By looking at the argument subjectively, it is difficult to choose a side; each argument has its pros and cons. I believe that there should be a balance of both. Everyone has passions and if an individual has the opportunity to turn his…
- 989 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
All children are required to graduate high school, but pursuing higher education is only recommended. While high school curriculum is designed to prepare students for higher education, students learn essential career readiness skills while enrolling in higher education classes. Since students are not obliged to pursue higher education, many students who decide not to continue their education lack the skills necessary for future careers. While some schools hope to implement career readiness for either all their students or for only the students who do not wish to pursue college, other schools do not want to offer career readiness programs as they believe that it offers incentives for students not to attend college. Schools should require all students to take career readiness classes as…
- 835 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Most students graduate from high school knowing what they want to persuade in life and accomplish, many other students don’t have a clue about anything they want to do nor persuade so for example, in the article The Pink Floyd Night School by Mark Edmundson, he as many other students after graduating high school didn’t know what he was going to do or study as a career, basically he had no clue of what he wanted. Life experience brought him the knowledge of knowing what he wanted to do in his career life. Edmundson uses many life experiences, as well as vivid examples to expand his argument of why he thinks students should take time off of school and about a year to just relax and figure out what career exactly do they want.…
- 911 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In “we are not created equal in every way”, Joan Rayn (2000) upholds the right of institutions in setting admission standards, however she presents a pressing concern for current students. Firstly the author asserts that we are not created equal, therefore institutions need standards of admission to increase their chances of success. Moreover she discusses a major problem that might occur to ‘young adults’. Since certain institutions require a young age to admit students, parents have to decide for their children. Several parents have the tendency to be living their dreams through their children.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Recently, universities give students more and more privilege to select their courses, aiming to raise their interests in studying. Driven by the trend, some people suggest that every course should be selected by the students. However, in my opinion, students shouldn’t have complete freedom to select their own course.…
- 312 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Secondly, older children should follow their own opinions simply because they may have personal ideas and perspectives that contrast from their parents’. In other words, they are the ones who know what suit them more than anyone can. For example, before graduating from high school, teenagers may have already picked the desired college that they would like to pursue their study further. In addition, choices should be made in accordance with individuals’ hobbies and interests, as well. This will surely cut down the remorse feeling that could possibly happen if the decisions are not properly chosen.…
- 437 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Should teenagers be given the opportunity to make their own decisions? Every parent wants his child to succeed in life. According to most parents nowadays, success means being powerful and rich. But it does not necessarily mean that being powerful and rich can make a persons life joyful. Adolescents are not given the opportunity to choose the career paths they wish to follow to build up their future. In some cases, adolescents have an agreement with their parents regarding their future career path. However, in other cases, there is a significant dissent. Parental pressure on children to follow a certain career path takes away their desire for learning. Thus, it is reasonable to revolt against parental pressure to follow a career path because you should have the freedom to choose the field that you are good in, and have interest in, which guarantees your better achievement in goals and, promising future workplace to be more satisfying and enjoyable. While on the other hand, brings individualism in the person.…
- 755 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Education is arguably the best gift a parent can give to their child. In today’s society, there has been an epidemic which is becoming more rampant throughout the world. Parents have taken the initiative to choose the life they think their child should live. Although the parent should be the most supportive on a child’s team, this support can negatively impact the child as they mature into adulthood. Allowing parents to choose their child’s career can cause draconian consequences such as the following: a high possibility of depression, prohibition of the child’s rights regarding freedom of choice, and also limitations on the child’s advancement in adulthood.…
- 1055 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
JULY 26 — The truth is, most students don’t know much about the world after secondary education. They simply assume that the best career options are to be either a doctor, lawyer, engineer or accountant. And if they are good academically, they automatically get pigeonholed into these career paths.…
- 2031 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One of the problems faced by students is that usually they are not free to choose study programmes of their own choice. Parents normally impose upon them a field of study which may not be suitable for the child or which he doesn’t feel comfortable with to study. This is a very common problem of our society. A student may want to be a journalist or a photographer but his parents may select engineering for him. So when he gets admission to the engineering college, he does not perform well. He then starts to feel that he is not fit for the field.…
- 344 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Parents know best – do they really? Deborah Y. Pratt YOUTH ISSUES Just as I thought, this captioned topic immediately made you as a parent begin to read, curious as to exactly what I would have to say in today's article. Well, as a parent, of course I would like to think that we really know best when it comes to our children. After all we are older than they are, should be more matured, have more life experiences and we are the ones admonished by God to train up our children in the way they should go. Many parents feel that because they have experienced life it is their responsibility to continue to direct their child's life straight through young adult and even into adulthood. Some say that they want to spare their children from making some of the mistakes they made while some, be it consciously or subconsciously, are trying to live their lives through their children. For others they may feel that they have a certain reputation to maintain and therefore their children must attend a certain college, pursue a certain career and live the dream life they visualized for them. I have heard far too many times children, teenagers preparing to graduate high school and go off to college, complain about being forced to pursue a certain career that they have no desire to. People usually work harder and perform better when it is something they really want to do. "If I'm the one paying to send you to college, you are studying to become a doctor or I won't be paying at all." Believe it or not some parents actually make similar statements to their children. Is this a good thing to do? Parents, what about choosing your child's mates? The last time I checked we were not living in one of those countries such as India, where this practice may be customary. Again as a parent, I reiterate that I understand parents wanting the best for their children, but you must know when to let go. In most cases a young man may not be a criminal or even a bum, but because he does not have…
- 465 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
pursue in life. As students try to make career choice while in secondary school, they face problem of matching…
- 308 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Choosing a career and getting a job are two of the most important things any person does in his life. Before young people finish school all of them think that they will choose a profession they want. But later all of them understand that choosing a profession or a career is a very serious problem. So when young people leave school, they face that problem. If pupils want to achieve their purpose, they should use the opportunity for promotion in the early age. The young people have to know that if they don’t think about their future life earlier, it will be too difficult to think about it later. It is an advantage to choose a future career while being at school because it gives a goal in your studies and enables to choose a right, suitable course of study.…
- 499 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Most of the time, the graduating high school students find it hard to select the course that is really fitted for their individual talents, strengths and intelligences. In addition, some don’t have the freedom to choose their courses because these have been predetermined already by their immediate set of influences. They also tend to choose a course based on popular choice. They follow what the trend is and forget what suits and what really brings out the best in them.…
- 538 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays