Preview

Edward Snowden

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
874 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edward Snowden
Whistleblowing is ne of the most controversial labels to have in our current society. You be a whistleblower it can lead you down the path of being someone who will get negative attention or someone who will get great praise. Through this many whistleblowers are brought into the public light. One of the biggest and most recent whistleblower is Edward Snowden. Through him the world was able to see the atrocities the government was doing against the people of the United States. The difference with his case and the Douglas Durand case was Snowden’s motivations were not driven by a monetary value. In the case of Durand, he was driven mostly by money.

Benefits to whistleblowing
There are many benefits to whistleblowing. One of the biggest benefits
…show more content…
Douglas Durand was a man who was setting up the company and working with the government to do so. Through this he was having secret meetings to be able to build a better case against them. He also filled a private law suit against them to ensure he got money when the case got exposed. Through this it displayed a very weak set of ethics from Mr. Durand. His primary goal was to get money not to fix the wrongful practices that were taking place. The ethics of the government is very similar. They are attempting to catch this company, but the way in which they attained that information was in a grey area at best. They were bordering on the part of entrapment. I believe that non of the major players in this case were acting ethically. I feel as though the actions of whistleblowing were justified in this case. I believe them was a problem in which the company wasn’t following the rules and the way to stop that is bring it to the public. I don’t believe that Durand was ethical in his approach to bringing this information to the public. His motivations were based off of a monetary value and not an ethical standpoint. Through this I believe that his actions were justified but his ethics were …show more content…
I was working for a gentleman who was adjusting the book. He was under reporting his sales in order to pay less money in Royalty. Through this he was able to save a percentage of his money. The problem I had was this is he was stealing from the company. I didn’t appreciate this and I didn’t think this was professional and appropriate. The biggest issue I had with this was not only was he under reporting but when I realized that he would report me as being the reason for the under reporting. I decided to report all of the stealing to the company he was stealing from. Through this I lost my job because he eventually found out that it was me and couldn’t trust me anymore. I don’t regret the decision that I made and I don’t blame him for firing me. It was a bad situation and I am happy I am not part of it

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Durand was offered the position as Vice President of Sales with Tap Pharmaceuticals, he had no idea what he was getting involved with. All he saw was a potential for a promotion in an industry where he had already served his time and made a name for himself. Durand has a couple alternatives in this ethical situation. He could have kept his mouth shut and adhered to Tap Pharmaceuticals ' policies and procedures and unethical practices. The outcome to this alternative could have proven to be very poor for Durand. If Durand continued to allow Tap Pharmaceuticals to conduct business in the sales department as they always had in the past, eventually, the federal government would have caught on to the unethical practices and levied fines against Tap Pharmaceuticals and Mr. Durand. He could have even been prosecuted for the practices he witnessed at Tap Pharmaceuticals. When employees are directed to blatantly break the law in order to keep sales up and to give out medicine samples without charging for them, there is a huge ethical problem. Tap Pharmaceuticals instructed the doctors to charge Medicare for the samples even though they never paid for them in the first place. It seemed as if Tap Pharmaceuticals planned to break every law of the trade in order to make the most money in the least amount of time. This alternative would not work…

    • 1920 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA’s Edward Snowden, FBI’s Mark Felt, White House Staffer Linda Tripp, Kerr-McGee’s Karen Silkwood and Sherron Watkins of Enron are all on the same list of famous whistleblowers. All of these people have become famous because they provided information with the sole purpose of revealing wrongdoings by someone or a company. Some believe whistleblowers are traitors and should be punished: while others believe they are heroes and should be honored. Whistleblowers are being acknowledged as a great threat to companies and managers are realizing that they need to know who they are and what they will do if their company is faced with this situation.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 573 Week 1 Homework

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Whistleblowers are the main ones that expose white-collar crimes in contemporary society. Whistleblowers are the ones that let the authorities and the public that another person is being involved in illegal activities occurring in the work place. Illegal activities can include fraud, violations of rules, laws, and or procedures. A whistleblower may tell someone within his or her organization or someone in law enforcement. In order to be a whistleblower according to federal authorities, the…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussion Question 2

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nothing great comes without a price. Although there are number of factors that influence the ethical behaviors of a person, none of these factors were powerful enough to change the unethical behaviors of these people CITATION Cer11 \l 1033 (Cernusca, 2011). If I were a high-level leader in this corporation, my personal ethics would not allow me to become ignorant to the situation that was occurring. Although millions of dollars were being distributed to these executives to essentially keep them quiet, there needed to be boundaries and a sense of empathy for all of the losses that others were suffering at the time. I would have alerted the proper authorities, made sure that all stakeholders were informed of the company’s debts and most importantly I would have sat all of the executives down to enforce the corporation’s code of ethics. If Lay was able to demote executives as quickly as he did for simply disagreeing with him, he had to have a reason and an ethical backing to support his decisions.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Snowden Affair Dbq

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The set of documents I will be reviewing are documents 118, 1, 4, and 26 regarding The Snowden Affair. The Snowden Affair is about a national security controversy that had to do with the National Security Agency (NSA) and its undisclosed surveillance of communications of American citizens under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The information was leaked by Eduard Snowden, a former NSA agent and was published by a British newspaper, The Guardian. The Guardian revealed the NSA’s surveillance operations which included the archiving and tracking of vast amounts of data regarding use of electronic devices of U.S. citizens U.S. citizens and any foreign communications. The data revealed that Internet traffic and…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enron Argument

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities. However, Sharron Watkins only blew the whistle internally and so did not do everything she was morally required do as Vice President of Corporate Development for Enron.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This opens a new range of views, ideas, and problems that people may not otherwise understand. When discussing whistleblower research, Adam Waytz, James Dugan, and Liane Young, (2013) conducted a study on the relationship between fairness and loyalty to a whistleblowers decision making, willingness, and the psychological view of whistleblowers. The purpose of this study was to find out the tradeoff between fairness and loyalty in an individual’s willingness to report. Waytz et. Al (2013, p.1031) found that in divided groups, participants in the fairness condition group engaged in more whistleblowing behavior than the individuals who were placed in the loyalty condition group. This study can contribute to the possible reasons why people decide to blow the whistle. This study shows the problems that whistleblowers have in decision making in regards to deciding between loyalty or fairness. It is important that individuals understand that deciding to blow the whistle is not something as simple as saying yes I will, or no I won’t, but rather it is often a decision between fairness and loyalty. When referencing this to historic problems of whistleblowing, it provides some context as to what can lead someone to blowing the whistle and the potential personality of that…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mike Rich

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The whistleblower poses no single entity, whether it being a single person or a business as a whole, to count itself immune to the dangers of corruption or malfeasance. Those who blow the whistle can neither risk the silencing of themselves for reasons of concrete evidence that question the proper moral and ethical interests of the public eye. According to Sissela Bok, “’Whistleblowing’ is a new label generated by our increased awareness of ethical conflicts encountered at work. Whistleblowers sound an alarm from within the very organization in which they work, aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest.” Take Frank Serpico, for example, a man whom was willing to risk his life, yet alone his career, to sound the alarm on the corruption within the very organization for which he worked for, the New York Police Department. Here in my discussion, we will examine and discuss Serpico’s case in correlation to the points made by Sissela Bok’s discussion on whistleblowing.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden Argument

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Edward Snowden was a hot topic in the news in 2013 after he released classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the media. This leak contained information about global surveillance performed by the United States, which involved monitoring email, tracking cell phones, and logging phone calls. Not only did this action force him into asylum overseas to avoid arrest, but it ultimately caused an uproar in the media and amongst the American public. The controversy surrounding Snowden involves the rights of the public vs. the surveillance programs performed by the U.S. While many condemn Snowden for betraying the national security of his country, many applaud him for exposing the…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the video clip _Incident at Morales_ there were many ethical issues demonstrated by the company. The characters did not show any remorse for safety, health, and environmental regulations. They failed to notify their coworkers and clients about the construction process when ethical decisions had to be made. The procedure of the project was not presented in an honest approach, therefore numerous corrupt actions occurred. Confidential topics were discussed freely among the employers. All employees were not treated equally and acknowledged for contributions.…

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    WHISTLE-BLOWERS have been big news lately — from Chelsea Manning, formerly known as Pfc. Bradley Manning, to Edward J. Snowden. Yet, for most people, the question of whether to expose unethical or illegal activities at work doesn’t make headlines or involve state secrets.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent discussions of Edward Snowden, a controversial issue has been whether or not he was wrong for leaking government information. On the one hand, some argue that he is an American hero. From this perspective, it is a good thing that he exposed the inappropriate surveillance tactics of the American government. On the other hand, however, others argue that he is a traitor. From this perspective, he betrayed his country by leaking information to other countries. In the words of President Barack Obama, “If any individual who objects to government policy can take it into their own hands to publicly disclose classified information, then we will not be able to keep our people safe, or conduct foreign policy” (Mason). In sum, then, the…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Edward Snowden harmed the United States by warning them. He warned them that they were being watch. So everyone was careful now to not get caught. Some people even stopped using technology to avoid trouble. Edward Snowden harmed the United States because he warned people, copied classified information, and made terrorist change their meaning of communication.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consider the technology that defines everyday life in America- texts, email, internet, and phone calls. In performing these constant activities, most never questioned their privacy, that is, until Edward Snowden squealed on the NSA’s less than ethical maneuvers. Without citizens’ consent, the American government was collecting metadata, “all the information surround a call, including the caller’s number, the receiver's number, the time and location of the call, and how long it lasted” (Diamond). The government may have been shooting for just the bad guys, but all American civilians got caught in the crossfire. Nothing would exempt a person from these invasions of privacy, and their data would be scanned and stored just like that of a seasoned…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics