Preview

Effectiveness And Efficiency In The War Against Alexande Alexander

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
549 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Effectiveness And Efficiency In The War Against Alexande Alexander
Alexander was both effective and efficient in his war against Darius. Although, low in numbers he utilize what he had as well as strategically planned for the battle he and his men were facing. Systems Approach (2007) defines being effective as getting the job done. While being efficient is the approach in which you get the job done (Systems Approach, 2007). Such as, the time, money and people a person utilizes to get the job done. The less of the resources used the more efficient it one is considered to be.
Alexander decision to have his men align on the side of Darius men was brilliant. This was a strategy that forced Darius men to get in a formation that his men would be able to have view of, given they were out-numbered. Carter McNamara wrote an article in Free Management Library were he discusses Developing Strategies. He states how planners fail to look at things from an external point of view. When doing this they only enhance what the organization is currently doing, verses improving weak areas, avoiding potential threats and taking advantage of new opportunities (managementhelp.org).
…show more content…
He knew his men were out-numbered. Alexander determined that he needed to use a method that would enclose the men of Darius army. Alexander’s soldiers aligning themselves to the side of Darius men forced them to go to their left; which put them in range of his soldiers face to face. Therefore, Alexander eliminated the potential threat of his men automatically been encompassed by Darius men. This not only assisted in an effort to balance out the even hand at battle but it also saved time from a prolong battle, due to them moving

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Alexander came across some of Darius’s scouts and he decided to capture them (“Battle of Gaugamela”). In turn, he learned of any obstacles on the battlefield and most importantly, he learned of Darius’s numbers. Alexander prepared to battle Darius’s large army with his generals overnight, and had came up with many strategies for the fight the next morning. The next day, Alexander’s army set up in their positions and advanced towards the Persians who were waiting for them.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite what we learn of the slow-witted, brash and aggressive young man that the Tsarovich Alexander III was, it seems that in suppressing his opposition in Russia his strong-minded and definitive attitude worked to his advantage. He made his first major statement when he executed the five members of the people’s will responsible for the assassination of his father, publicly hanging them as a warning to others of his policy with regards to those committing treason.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After defeating the Persian army in the battle at Granicus, the army moved south searching for the main force. The main force was led by the ruler of Persia, Darius. The battle happens in a narrow area between the gulf of Issus and mountains on November 5, 333 BC. The macedonian army used its phalanx, and Alexander used his tactics to adapt to the situation. The army had a phalanx in the center, hypaspists on the right, and companion cavalry with Alexander riding with them on the flank. On the left was a mix of heavy and light cavalry, with an infantry in reserve. Far right in the hills, the army had agrarians, elite javelin soldiers, and cavalry. The Macedonian army advances, protecting their flank. Alexander led an attack of the agrarians, and managed to drive off the heavy infantry. Meanwhile the rest of the macedonian cavalry on that flank drove off the persian cavalry. On the opposite flank, the Persian heavy cavalry succeeding in pushing back the weaker cavalry of the Macedonian army. Alexander responded to this by using his infantry. The Macedonians with this infantry put up a defensive line against a possible breakthrough. As the Persian line advanced, placing their flank in the air, they left themselves vulnerable. The Agrarians continued to pursue heavy infantry, while the cavalry turned on the flank of the infantry. Alexander in this moment saw Darius and advanced toward him. He believed that by…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the meantime while Alexander is occupied luring Darius’s cavalry out, the two forces marched towards each other and started a battle. In the midst of the battle it was without a doubt as how Alexander’s general had predicted; Alexander left and center army would be struggling against the Persians and their wagons that had spears pointing out of the wheels. The purpose of the wagons are counter against the phalanx 18 inch spears by having a heavy wagon ramming through the phalanx and sweep any soldiers caught in the spears sticking out of the rims (Yenne 76). While Alexander’s left and center army was struggling against the Persians wagons, Alexander had finally lured Darius’s cavalry long enough and hit a u-turn going forty-five degrees towards the center of the Persian army, where Darius was located in (Yenne 75). And miraculously for Alexander all goes well for him and Darius fell for Alexander same tactic a second time and was faced with Alexander and his cavalry charging toward him after a successful tactic by them.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Tsarist reign of Alexander II (1855 – 1881), Alexander implemented a number of reforms that were destined to change the Russian social system. These reforms were the result of Russia’s humiliating military defeat in the Crimean war, as it awakened Alexander to the need for far reaching reforms in order to bring Russia up-to-date with the rest of Europe. However as these reforms were implemented a number of social and political issues arose which resulted in the death of Alexander before he could accomplish his dream of a modernised Russia. But was modernising Russia really Alexander’s intention? Did he really deserve the title ‘Liberator’?…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great’s ability to maintain effective organizational systems and structure and seamlessly communicate and execute strategies were the catalysts of his defeat of Darius’ larger army (Nassar, n.d.). To begin with, Alexander rigorously trained and prepared his troops to fight prior to an actual battle, which enabled him to maintain a small, agile, highly disciplined, and efficient army (History.com, 2009). Furthermore, Alexander’s appointment of commanders to each unit enhanced real time communication and facilitated coordinated disbanding of phalanxes to allow Darius’ cavalry units to pass through the phalanx, where they were attacked by Alexander’s infantry units (Wasson, 2014). Therefore, attacking Darius’s left flank, in conjunction…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alexander was the eldest son of Tsar Nicholas I and was born in Moscow in 1818. Alexander became Tsar of Russia in 1855 after his father's death. At that time Russia was in the Crimean War but then in 1856 russia signed the Treaty of Paris that put an end to the war. Alexander knew that his military power wasn't strong enough anymore and his advisers informed him that Russia's economy is not even close enough to be competed with industrialized nations such as Great Britain and France. This is when Alexander II considered to abolish serfdom in Russia but the nobility objected and Alexander's reply was "It is better to abolish serfdom from above than to wait for the time when it will begin to abolish itself from below." So Alexander abolished serfdom and all peasants were allowed and able to…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The story of the Battle of Gaugamela was between Darius of Persia and Alexander the Great of Macedon which took place 331 B.C.E. (Nassar, 2007). Darius was well informed about his enemy, chose and prepared the battle ground and outnumbered his opponent four to one. Alexander’s efficient and effective battle plan would overcome his lack of resources (Nassar, 2007). Alexander the Great is knowingly famous for being a great leader and conquering the Persian Empire.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Traditionally it is assumed that he was a reactionary, unlike the reformer his father, Alexander II, had been. However, as so often the case, this interpretation of Alexander III’s rule is undisputed. There is much reason to believe that despite some different policies, ultimately both men wanted to reach the same goals. Alexander III unquestionably did undermine the reforming policies of his father, but the underlying reasons for this are not so obvious.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Efficiency and Effectiveness – can result in a business being more efficient, more organised and more…

    • 2169 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great was the king of Macedonia, conqueror of the Persian Empire, and one of the greatest military geniuses of all times. Even at an early age, Alexander had the promise to become a great leader. Through all his victories and conquests, he has become a great hero and has had a large impact on history. That is why I chose he book Alexander the Great, by J.R. Hamilton for my review. Hamilton does a very good job with the story of Alexander the Great.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How To Attack Gaugamela

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Macedonian plan of attack was an odd one, and had only been used a few times prior to Gaugamela. Alexander began by ordering his sarissa-armed foot companions forward in a phalanx formation towards the center of the enemy line with the wings echeloned back at a forty five degree angle to entice the Persian cavalry to attack. While the phalanxes fought the Persian infantry, Darius sent a large part of his cavalry and a portion of his regular infantry to attack Parmenion's forces on the Macedonian left. Alexander led his Companion Cavalry to near the brink of his right flank. His strategy was to attract as much of the Persian horseman to the wings as possible in order to form a breach within the enemy line where a decisive blow could then be struck at Darius in the center. Alexander would force Darius to attack, though the Persian king was cautious to be the first to attack after fearing what happened at Issus against a similar formation. Darius, faced with a threat no matter his decision, reluctantly he ordered his horsemen to follow Alexander. Eventually, Alexander saw his chance now, covered by auxiliary troops to fend off the remaining Persian cavalry while Alexander’s force charged into ranks of the preoccupied troops. Alexander’s military genius showed with this maneuver, as it caused a full rout of Darius’ army.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There’s no question about Alexander’s military intelligence or even greatness, He’s actually named after it, Alexander the Great. However, he was stuck down at a young age by malaria. It wouldn’t be hard to wonder what would have happened if he had lived longer. In order to come to a conclusion, Alexander’s life must be researched and truly focus on the last few years of it. This would pinpoint how things were unraveling for him.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Returning to Tyre, Alexander prepared for his battle with Darius III and his Persian Army. Heading toward Babylon, he found a Persian army near the plains of Gaugamela. “According to the exaggerated accounts of antiquity was said to number a million men. The Macedonians spotted the lights from the Persian campfires and encouraged Alexander to lead his attack under cover of darkness” (Alexander the Great Alexander…

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander the Great came up with affective alternatives to help achieve his plan of winning the Battle of Gaugamela. Effective alternatives stimulate efficiency (Hultman, 2016). Alexander appeared to have more insight on how to make the most of his team. He knew that affective alternatives would be necessary to gain the victory because Darius of Persia had an advantage in the battle. Darius of Persia started the battle with a larger amount of soldiers, as well as, first choice of the battleground. Alexander the Great knew that Darius having this advantage would warrant him to consider all resources and strategies to gain the victory over the skirmish. Alexander organized a methodical game plan for his troops (Nassar, 2007). The writer feels…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays