Preview

Elizabeth I Vs Louis Xiv Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
483 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Elizabeth I Vs Louis Xiv Essay
During the 16th and 17th century, there were two major monarchs who ruled England, and France. These two leaders were Elizabeth I, and King Louis XIV. These two historical leaders were known for their ruling and how they dealt with problems. Louis XIV ruled more with an iron fist, While Elizabeth I was wiser and had more thought in how she did things. Although Louis XIV and Elizabeth I Both share the effect of being an influence to and for their country, they are more dissimilar in the way they rule by Louis Being power hungry and Elizabeth being subtle.
Even though Louis XIV and Elizabeth I had their differences, they had similarities as well. For example, both monarchs wanted to spread religion, Louis didn`t like protestants and wanted to
…show more content…
For instance, the way that the two monarchs dealt with problems that came up during their rule. For Louis XIV, it was when he wanted to dispose of the Huguenots. He did this by prohibiting Protestants from settling in New France. Elizabeth was more calm and knowledgeable with problems she faced. Elizabeth wanted to make England Protestant but if she did, there would be a civil war that would break out in England. She solved this with creating a compromise with the Church of England so that the civil war could be evaded. Another difference between the two Monarchs was that Louis XIV was an Absolute Monarch, while Elizabeth was not. Louis XIV could make decisions left and right and not have any restrictions of power, while on the other hand, Elizabeth I has to consult the parliament on every one of her decisions and she had to deal with the government while she was ruling.
Although Louis XIV and Elizabeth were very similar monarchs in many ways, the majority of their comparative qualities were different from each other. This being that Louis took a more firm stand on his power and used it to its full extent, while Elizabeth was more conscientious of her power and dint misuse or abuse it. While it is clear now to see the differences between monarchs during the 16th and 17th centuries, it is clearer to see the similarities and differences between Louis XIV and Elizabeth

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    These monarchs were viewed as a husband or father ruling their household ? essentially not having to answer to anyone about what went on in their household. This became the norm for the sixteenth and seventeenth century which, up to this time, had been filled with destruction and chaos. Louis XIV developed a complex, yet simple, structure of government to rule the 36 generalities that France became divided into. Rulers of the areas were often not born or raised in the area they ruled ?…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One similarity between Tokugawa and Louis XIV is decreasing power of Nobles. What Louis XIV did to decrease the power of the nobles is by breaking down their castles. The reason he broke down the castles was because he didn’t want the nobility to rebel against him. This relates to Tokugawa because he also destroyed the castles of daimyos (The nobles of Japan). Tokugawa had many restrictions for the daimyos. The reason he had restrained them from their property is so they don’t rebel against the shogun, which is Tokugawa. He also restricted who the daimyos should marry and what they should wear. Both Tokugawa and Louis XIV are very similar in decreasing the power of the nobles. They both had the nobles/daimyos live with the king/shogun, and…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XVI’s rule was defiantly not similar to the Rule of Napoleons rule when you get down to the basics. Louis XVI and Napoleon Bonaparte were two of the most significant rulers in French history for many different reasons. Being so young the inexperienced Louis XVI led France into the beginning of a bloody French Revolution. Napoleon on the other hand launched France to the top in Europe shortly after. Louis XVI and Napoleon differed in three main categories including: qualifications, domestic policy, and foreign policy.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elizabeth had inherited the throne of England in 1558 from a Catholic queen Mary who had attempted to re-convert England back to Catholicism and to allow the country to take part in the Catholic reformation of Europe. The accession of Elizabeth was met with anxiety and tension as to discover what she was to do in response to religion and how the Catholic powers of Europe as well as the Catholics within England at the time would treat any changes. The immediate rise to power was met with little hostility as Elizabeth had made very cautious changes to start with as she thought it wise not to provoke hostility from abroad considering the position of England at the time as a small, weak protestant nation. The start of Elizabeth’s reign was fairly peaceful however tensions rose and a Catholic threat seemed more imminent as her reign drew to the end.…

    • 2682 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV believed that one king should have power and control over the country of France. To do this he reorganized the army and was exceptionally…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's suggestion that a ruler should rule like both a lion and a fox is exemplified to very different degrees with the monarchs Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, and Louis XI of France. Isabella and Ferdinand were strong, ferocious leaders who implemented local and state level authority impressively. They also cleverly established a guilded appearance as religious figures connected through diplomatic alliance to the Catholic church. They follow Machiavelli's suggestion to the T. Louis XI of France, tells a different tale. Although he was known as the “Spider King”, infamous of his scheming, he was cleverly created footholds in the capitalistic realm of his country. His greatest downfall was his lack of foresight, and sheepish tendencies toward reclusiveness and isolation.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their countries. Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elizabethan England is different from the United States in many ways, from marriages and religion, to having monarchies and democracy. But we are both alike in some ways. We are both in a relatively peaceful period and we are both prospering, after getting back up from hard times. Our funerals and mourning rituals are still very similar (Elizabeth…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolute Ruler Essay

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Louis XIV, Peter the Great, and Tokugawa Ieyasu all considered their own power and strengthened their states in many different ways but their actions were all similar. They united their states, introduced reforms and assessed their power and the effect that they could have on others. Although their techniques were different, the ways these monarchs ruled their states show great similarities.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason that Queen Elizabeth I is considered influential is because from birth she was faced with struggle. When Elizabeth was born into the Tudor family on September 7th, 1553, her parents thought she was a disappointment. “The son she had hoped so confidently to bear the man child, who would save England from a threatened civil war, this child had somehow withdrawn among the shadows and in his place there emerged this little girl Elizabeth.” Her parents, King Henry VIII and Anne Boleyn wanted a son who could take the throne and rule England but to their dismay they got a daughter. Growing up Elizabeth had to deal with not having a female role model in her life.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter the Great and Charles I have some similarities as well as differences. They both made many impacts for the time after their rulings. They had different monarchs which made lots of there feelings about things different. I believe Peter the Great had more power and was a better ruler then Charles I. They type of monarch they were affected there nation because it made there rulings very…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of divine power is what links Queen Elizabeth and King Louis XIV. Queen Elizabeth I was regin England from November 17,1558 through March 23, 1603 her death. King Louis XIV reign France from 14 May 1643 to his death 1 September 1715. He reign much longer than Queen Elizabeth but they both had different styles in ruling over this country. They did however believe they got their strength and power from God. God was leading them to the right path for their country. Elizabeth I was Protestant while King Louis XIV was Catholic and they both showed different degrees of religious freedom to their people. Their attitude towards how God has given them power is one of the major difference that will be seen between Queen Elizabeth I and King…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diogenes and Alexander

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One is trying to live the simple life while the other is a king; one does not have to worry about anyone but himself, yet the other has to worry about an entire country; one of them basically educated himself, while the other was taught by Aristotle.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “At one time in France, kings and queens ruled. Many people were very angry with the decisions made by the kings and queens.” (Harris) France then under the rule of King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette, was an absolute monarchy. It wasn’t just the king and queen, who got to enjoy the royal desserts. Rich people and others who the king and queen liked were invited to dinner at the royal table, or to stay in the royal residence. While all the mobs starved in the streets.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays