Growing up I have always wondered what nature’s true meaning is. Although there are various interpretations of nature, I have always been confused about what nature really is and what its true purpose for human beings are. I recently stumbled across the ted talk “nature is everywhere” by Emma Marris. In the ted talk, Emma Marris clarified that nature is anything that can be multiplied and it is anything that has life, or in broader words nature is not only animals, trees, and flowers, but is can be further defined as us human beings as well. It was shocking to me that all my life I have been searching what nature truly is, but I was so blind to the fact that I am nature myself. Emma Marris then proceeded to successfully …show more content…
In our society today, many things we think are nature in actuality are man made or are “man disturbed” as she said. During her speech, Marris mentioned that environmental writer Bill McKibben stated that because man has been detached from nature, and due to the climate changes everyday, we will eventually forget about nature and nature will perish. Emma Marris proceeded to disagree with Bill McKibben claiming that we are nature because nature is everything and anything that has life within itself. Emma Marris also explained that even the parts of nature that are barely touched such as the Rocky Mountains and Yellow Mountains are deeply impacted by us humans. Emma Marris continued her argument by using logos, logic, by apprising us that although we carry this belief that all these beautiful landscapes of this world were naturally made and are apart of nature, humans have had their influential impact on them by getting rid of ancient animals resulting in the change of landscapes and the altering of various features resulting in their radiant perfect appearance In the ted talk, Emma Marris also stated that if we believe that nature are tonly the untouched parts of the world where people have not influenced it, then we have the incorrect perception on nature. Nature is an assembly of the many species with …show more content…
She also further strengthened her argument by using ethos, emotional appeal, by assuring the audience that what is not touched can never be loved. She explained to the audience that we should allow our children to explore the wonders of nature, even the parts of nature that are perceived to be unappealing. The moment we permit our children to begin playing with touching nature their love of nature will be never ending and they will grow to love and protect it. We can never preserve nature if we do not experience it. I related with Emma Marris’ statement that nature will never be loved if it is not tied to our lives. Growing up I was taught to believe that some parts of nature are disgusting, and shouldn’t be touched, which resulted in my hating some aspects of nature and not being a nature lover. Now as young adult, I taught my younger siblings the same teachings I was raised on, and now we all do not tinker with nature and love it in any type of way, or not as much as we