Preview

end of an era

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
871 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
end of an era
End of and Era

Queen Victoria reigned from 1837-1901 although the initial date of the “Victorian Age” dates back to 1832. A landowning elite dominated this era of politics. The last decades of the 19th century for Britain was an era that began to transition away from the traditional Victorian ideals. . It was a period that had many changes in political beliefs regarding the role of government and also a period of economic change.

The Reform Bill of 1832 that was written by Lord Palmerston, the prime minister, had achieved a prestige that allowed the bill to be known as “…near-perfect a constitution as humanly possible…” that it was able to discourage any meddling with the English political system until the reform act of 1867. It wasn’t until 1865 when Lord Palmerston passed away, along with the 1865 Union victory of the American Civil War that allowed the flood gates of reform to finally open.

In 1866 William Gladstone proposed a bill that would give the franchise to residents that paid more than seven pounds a year in rent which would in turn give the right to vote to over 300,000 skilled workers. The bill divided the parties because people were afraid not of aristocracy losing its influence for conservatives both Whigs and Torries, but that non-educated people would swamp the educated and thus not allow the government to function properly. The Whigs also feared democracy, Gladstone ensured them his purpose was not to establish democracy, but to entitle a certain element of the population. The bill barely passed the House of Commons and was immediately bogged down by the committee. In 1867, a bill proposed by Deby, the prime minister, and Disraeli, the Chancellor of the Exchequer and leader of the House of Commons was presented.

In order to influence those conservatives that were appalled to the idea of being submerged in a democratic world, Derby and Disraeli had to compose a more complex scheme. In order for the urban rate payers to obtain a vote,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    They wasnted the Lords to never again block a measure passed by the House of Commons. Therefore in 1990 they drew up a bill to curb the power of the House of Lords by taking away the power to veto. Reform of the Lords was vital as the Conservatives were strongly opposed to Home Rule for Ireland, and would vote against any Home Rule Bill in the Lords. This was necessary as the Liberals had promised Home Rule to the Irish Nationalists, in return for their support, so reform of the Lords had to take place before Home Rule could be brought in. The 1910 Parliament Bill proposed that the House of Lords was to have the power to amend or reject those bills the speaker of the Commons certifies to be true money Bills. The Lords veto was abolished, but could delay it for no longer than two years. Also the maximum period between general elections was to be reduced from seven years to five to make parliament more accountable to electors. Although the Bill was not as radical as it could have been because it did not alter the composition of the Lord. The Bill would easily pass through the House of Commons but to curb the Lords’ power would have to be passed by the Lords themselves. Asquith planned to ask King Edward Vll to create 570 new peers, who would be willing to outvote the Conservative Lords and therefore ensure the parliament bill…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is evidence of early political reformers dating back to the 1740's, all wanting universal male suffrage and many of them agreed with parts of the charter. But, due to the French revolution in 1789 and the ongoing war between France and Britain, political change was resisted in case any of these events were repeated. The war had left Britain facing harsh economic circumstances and deep political divides.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 1870s-1900s was a great era for the government and as well as the people. The…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Liberals claimed that the Lords were the selfish rich who weren’t willing to help the country, whereas the Conservatives tried to appeal to the wealthy stating that this would lead to social revolution and that is was the duty of the House of Lords to block controversial policy that the public hadn’t voted on. The Liberals won with a 2 seat majority and the support of the Irish Nationalists who were hoping to obtain Home Rule through the Liberal government which led to the tax being passed. This Liberal win led to the second constitutional crisis where the Liberals pushed a bill which sought to remove the power of the House of Lords to veto bills and replace it with a power of suspensory veto, to delay a bill for 2 years – yet remove their power entirely to alter ‘money bills’. The Lords rejected this again which led to Asquith going to King Edward VII asking him to create more Liberal peers which he agreed to but died before he could bring this reality. His son King George V preferred a more consensual agreement between the two parties and this led to the 1910 constitutional conference where the conservatives offered to reform Lords powers, yet the Liberals rejected this and the conference ended in November which led to the second 1910 general…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you agree with the view that Disraeli’s support for the 1867 Reform Act was motivated mainly by personal ambition? (Written in timed conditions)…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the early twentieth century the Liberal Government was worried that Britain’s military capability and general military power was not as strong and it once was. Therefore, the Government’s concern over national security definitely influenced the decision for the reforms. However, there are three main factors that also need to be taken into account when deciding if concern over national security was the real reason for the reforms: the Social reasons, concerns for Britain’s Empire and the Political motive. The Social reasons played a large part in persuading the Liberals to reform. The detailed reports of Booth and Rowntree, and the evidence which was brought to light, highlighted that nearly a 1/3 of Britain’s population lived in poverty. This needed to be addressed by the Government. In addition, criticisms of the Poor Law effectively put pressure on the Liberals. The Boer War shone light on the ineffective and malnourished British Army. Britain’s embarrassing performance and recruitment in the War raised concerns over Britain’s overall military capability and the general health of Britain’s populace. In addition to this, the Liberal Government was concerned that Britain was losing its status as a major industrial power. Political motives for reform include the changing attitudes within the party, New Liberalism, the fear of the ever increasing popularity of the Labour Party and the party advantage which the Liberals would have received from introducing reform.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tory government from 1819 to 1829 introduced a lot of social and economic reforms, which had both positive and negative effects and varied in success. The cabinet shuffle in 1822 gave the Tories a ‘liberal’ reputation as many of the successful reforms came after this; however it can be questioned whether or not they were as liberal as they seemed as a lot of their reforms had already been in production beforehand and were not actually thought of by the ‘liberal’ Tory government.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This question focuses on the importance of the Second Reform Act in Disraeli’s rise to the top of the Conservative Party and his emergence as the leader. In order to decide on the relative importance of the Send Reform Act, I will also consider other factors, which impacted on Disraeli’s emergence, including the 1846 split of the Conservative party and the death of George Bentinck, Derby’s ineffective leadership, Palmerston’s death in 1865 and Disraeli’s determination and political skill.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The electoral system in the early nineteenth century was radically different from the parliamentary democracy we have today. The system was not representative of the population in terms of wealth or region, and elections were open to corruption. Before 1832, just ten per cent of British adult males were eligible to vote – and this portion of the population was the richest.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially, the Whigs had won the political battle over the 1832 Reform Act as a result of nationwide confrontation with the Tories and the House of Lords. However, Earl Grey's successor, Lord Melbourne relaxed the aggression of the reformation programme and towards their last few years as the ruling government, the Whigs lost many opportunities to improve social conditions in towns and working conditions in factories and had no further resolved the issue of Free Trade until 1841. So this points towards the fact that the Whigs were simply not willing to…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both men, who served as Prime Ministers, reformed many institutions with many of them effecting the working class like education (bringing up the working class), trade union (helping the working class fight for work wrights), public health (living conditions affecting the working class) and licensing (the way many working class people passed the time), along with the electoral institution (workers being able to vote on the matters which the work upon, such as factory conditions and education). Many historians, such as William Kuhn, argue that William Gladstone, the Liberal Prime Minister, passed many other reforms as well to help the working class, including the Ballot Act of 1872. However, some historians, such as Monypenny and Buckle, say that Benjamin Disraeli, the Conservative Prime Minister, did more to help the working class, including passing the Second Great Reform Act of 1867.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gladstone's Ministry

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To what extent does Gladstone's ministry of 1868-74 deserve its reputation as a great reforming one?…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The title, “great” is reserved for a select few characters and documents in history. Alfred earned his through establishing stable change, peace and improvement. So too the Magna Carta, which brought about greater justice and freedom for the common man and limited royal influence. In the same ways, the reform act of 1832 warranted the title. It was by no means a revolutionary measure, nor “the final solution of a great constitutional question” as Russell had put it, but both symbolically and physically, it spelt change for Britain. This in itself showed its greatness – despite Pitt having attempted reform in the 1780s, and the issue having repeatedly returned to parliament, no reform had been achieved. The fact that finally after so much time and so much fight, a reform measure had been brought in, it did not so much matter what was contained in the act, or if it benefited anyone. The symbolic victory and relief that ‘reform had begun’ was enough for most people to perceive it as “great”. The symbolic victory would not have been enough for long though; for the reform act to be considered “great”, it would have to be a step towards a fairer, more democratic government. In addition to this, it would have been imperative for it not to worsen the common man’s situation. Some historians have argued that reform was brought in by the Whigs purely as a political move to secure more seats; if this was the primary motivation it would detract from the “greatness” of the act. In essence, the reform act was “great”. In the short term, it avoided bloody revolution, strengthened and stabilised the current social and political situation and granted a fairer and more democratic system. In the long term, it did open Peel’s feared “door” of reform that the Tories were unable to close (reform continued and advanced), but it did so in a measured, safe and gradual way so as to preserve tradition, maintain peace, and ensure the continued development of a secure, fair and benevolent…

    • 2586 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under her, there was a tremendous growth in wealth and poverty; major cities such as Manchester and Birmingham grew; literacy rates skyrocketed; and civil work projects were accomplished. The period of revitalization and growth in Great Britain was called the Victorian Era which was coined after Queen Victoria.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Disraeli had actually voiced support for reform on several occasions, even when opposing to the previous liberal bill, he criticised the details rather than the principle. Unlike other conservatives, he felt that reform was inevitable; therefore, he believed that the conservatives could harness the support of this increased electorate. Not only this, but also the fact that he wanted to educate his party. This meant that introducing parliamentary reform himself would encourage his party to embrace the policy of…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays