English Debate

Thank you, Mr Chairperson. Ladies and gentlemen, members of the hall, the opponents really remind me of a past time memory. Perhaps the movie John English; he knows no fear, he knows no danger, he knows nothing.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

My dear first opponent of the opposition team keep on stressing over and over again on how much we as a so called “new generation” benefit more from present hobbies than past time hobbies. But to our dismay ladies and gentlemen, she obviously is not being clear to herself regarding our motion today which I will now read it out loud as “Present Hobbies are not as interesting as Past Hobbies”. We are not discussing on what are the positive traits of present hobbies to our convenience but instead we are talking about why, the reasons, why do present hobbies are being regard not as interesting as past hobbies? What is it about past hobbies that have caught our senses into thinking that; “Well, this is interesting. But hey, look. This is way more interesting!”

Regarding to her rebuttals towards the first speaker of the government team arguments; the first opponent stress that past hobbies are not creative enough compared to present hobbies. Now, allow me to ask, to what extent do the opposition team refers creativity as? Because as much as I can remember the game “upih kelapa” were only innovated using the coconut leaves and “baling selipar” were discovered by using a pair of slippers. Isn’t that considered creative enough when we discover something new? Creativity is such subjective matter for us to discuss about that it may costs us another debate with the government and opposition restlessly argue on whose stand are better than other. So, let us do a favour and leave the creativity out of the discussion.

Secondly, the opponent exclaimed that we, the government team are being bias by only discussing past time hobbies that involve traditional games. My dear ladies and gentlemen, we are