What happened to Enron was just its founder at the time Ken Lay was greedy and unethical right from the beginning, and that was how he steered the boat to that direction. Instead of firing traders who were pocketing profits for themselves, manipulating reports which showed steady financial trends, he managed to keep them, because they were making a lot of money for the company. So he was giving opportunities for this staffs to do underhand works and he only cared if it made profits for the company. Later, when Jeff Skilling joined Enron, he developed what Lay had…
Few business episodes have been the subject of so much debate and despair as the swift descent of once-admired energy trader Enron. The saga of this firm, which rose to prominence as rapidly as it subsequently fell, serves as a kind of morality tale of corporations, regulators, and investors. As we have discussed in class, the tragic effects of Enron’s overreaching arrogance provide a textbook example of both the best and the worst of American business culture and practice. Although the catastrophe’s complete impact may never be completely determined, it seems likely that Enron’s collapse caused more than one major company to cease to exist, several industries experienced radically changed environments, regulators and investors modified their behavior, and all firms are now subjected to greater scrutiny and regulatory oversight. So how did one of the brightest stars of American…
References: Dharan, Bala G.; William R. Bufkins (2004), Enron: Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications, Foundation Press, ISBN 1-58778-578-1…
The Enron debacle created what one public official reported was a “crisis of confidence” on the part of the public in the accounting profession. List the parties who you believe are most responsible for that crisis. Briefly justify each of your choices.…
The affect of the unethical behavior of the profitability of Enron was that the third party “outside” independent auditors was not able to backup and have accounting financial statements, some of those auditors and financial institutions may have been misled by the corporation’s net income.…
Some argue Enron’s record-breaking bankruptcy and eventual demise was the result of a lack of ethical corporate behavior attributed, more generally, to capitalism’s inability to check the unmitigated growth of corporate greed. Others believe Enron’s collapse can be traced back to questionable accounting practices such as mark-to-market accounting and the utilization of Special Purpose Entities (SPE’s) to hide financial debt. In other instances, people point toward Enron’s mismanagement of risk and overextension of capital resources, coupled with the stark philosophical differences in management that existed between company leaders, as the primary reasons why the company went bankrupt. Yet, despite these various analyses of why things went wrong, the story of Enron’s rise and fall continues to mystify the general public as well as generate continued interest in what actually happened.…
In 2001, the world was shocked by the demise of Enron, a multibillion dollar corporation that had thousands of employees and people that had affiliations with the company including The White House itself. Because of the financial chaos and destroyed lives and reputations this catastrophe left in its path, questions arose concerning how exactly it happened, why it occurred, and who was behind it. It is essential to understand how this multibillion dollar corporation rose to power and later imploded. Enron itself was born as the result of Houston’s Natural Gas and InterNorth, a gas based pipeline company from Nebraska in 1985. In the final analysis, the conspiracy of Kenneth Lay, Jeffery Skilling, and others, including the accounting firm of Authur Anderson, led to the collapse of Enron due to fraud, shady accounting practices, false reporting revenue, and general disregard of virtually every principle of business ethics.…
Enron, one of the largest corporations in America and once ranked Fortune magazine’s “Most Admired Companies” went down in 2001 after they were exposed of defrauding their investors in a series of creative ways. Enron was known for being an innovative company in the energy, technology space but much of their innovation seemed to lie in how they managed to hide their debts and cover their losses through unscrupulous means. They would book hypothetical profits on projects and joint ventures that had not yet launched and on the day a deal was signed. They would hide their debts through the use of complex Special Purpose Entities (SPEs). They would solicit support from top tier investment banks by giving them lucrative deals to work on. All this and more was conducted with one clear objective in mind: to make as much money as possible through manipulation. Everyone was happy as long as there was money to be made. Ethics was out the window. Manipulating financial books and records, exploiting deregulated markets became their predominant strategy -all in the name of maximizing profits and pushing up the company’s stock price. When indicted, the chief executives of Enron, Kenneth Lay (former Chairman and CEO) and Jeffrey Skilling (CEO), amongst others, continually denied their involvement.…
Two years after Enron filed for bankruptcy in 2001, Nancy b. Rapoport wrote this essay expressing her unique perspective on the real cause of Enron’s demise. This essay catches the reader’s attention instantly, because unlike abundant other articles written on the biggest corporate scandal in American history, the author here rejects Jeff Skilling’s (former president of Enron) argument1 of what brought about Enron’s downfall. She instead uses another metaphor, arguing that Enron’s downfall was more like Titanic’s- hubris and over reliance on checks and balances that led to its demise rather than a ‘Perfect Storm’ of events. The purpose behind her preference of the metaphor ‘Titanic’ over ‘Perfect storm’ clarifies and warns readers about not being misled into believing that Enron’s downfall was based on factors ‘outside of the company’s control’ rather was caused by a ‘synergetic combination of human errors’. In justifying the Titanic as a more apt analogy to the downfall of Enron, the author offers strong arguments such as how the Enron is in some sense a larger-than-life disaster much like the Titanic. While Titanic’s failure was tied to the unrealistic faith in technology to protect passengers, Enron’s failure was tied to the unrealistic faith that formal and informal checks and balances could always keep the market honest. However, her strongest argument of ‘hubris’ found both in the top executives of Enron as well as the officers of Titanic is not convincing. As much as the greed for money is evident in Enron employees and their arrogant behavior, her equivalent assertion that the Titanic can trace the loss of life directly to human arrogance (pg 209) lacks adequate evidence. Whether her proof of…
The central text for this project is the film Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room by filmmaker Alex Gibney. This film investigates, documents and then exposes the many moves that led to the collapse of Enron. The director focuses on the chief leaders of the corporation as his principal characters in order to develop the story as a human tragedy. Throughout the course of the film, each leading character is revealed. All players were found to be distinct in their strategies and methods. However, all were alike in their attitude and way of thinking. Each one was goal-driven and each found a way, by whatever means possible, to achieve their desired end: making money. Gibney incorporates many strategic moves into this film that contribute…
“Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” shows us how basic human nature does not change, whether it is firing as a means to resolve disputes, or in the ceaseless obsession to gain for profitability sake. This all makes for terrible human actions. According to Bethany McLean, the collapse of Enron is a story of “human failure” that created a culture where profitability is the priority.…
The film Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (2005) demonstrates that Enron, as a company, was managed through patriarchal and authoritarian principles that facilitated, and even encouraged, illegal activity. Enron was a well-respected company that received accolades in the press and was named Fortune Magazine’s most admired company for several years; this created an atmosphere of supremacy and superiority within the business and the top company leaders (Gibney, 2005). Company leaders like Jeffrey Skilling, Lou Pai, and Kenneth Lay fostered an authoritarian environment within the company where whistleblowers or other doubters were humiliated and devalued; at the same time, the company was engaged in illegal and unethical business practices perpetrated against the public (Schwartz, 2002). The authoritarianism within Enron only grew as the company’s financial footing became less secure (Schwartz,…
It is perhaps the most compelling business ethics case in a generation—a textbook version of what can go wrong in an organization that lacks a true culture of ethical compliance. Investors and the media once considered Enron to be the company of the future, but as its demise suggests, it was in reality not a particularly modern business organization, especially in its approach to ethics. On the surface, at least, it appeared to reject progressive innovation in governance and ethics programs and instead sought to circumvent systems that were designed to protect the company and its shareholders. The purpose of this report is not to comment on the legal or political ramifications of the case but rather to focus on the business ethics issues raised by the conduct of the company’s directors and officers, its accountants, and lawyers as it is known to date. It is meant to be a reminder that simply having a detailed code of ethics on the books (as Enron certainly did) is not enough. Organizations need to infuse ethics and integrity throughout their corporate culture as well as into their definition of success.…
This paper will describe the legal environment of business, the sources of American law, and the basis of authority for government to regulate business, differentiate between civil law and criminal law and describe the various classifications of crimes as it relates to Enron and the scandal the caused their downfall by using technology and information resources to research issues in business law.…
ENRON was a multinational energy corporation that was founded in Omaha, Nebraska in 1985. Regardless of ENRON’s vast successes within the natural gas industry - within which it was considered to be one of the foremost natural gas conglomerate companies, the mention of the name ENRON in current times is commonly associated with a financial scandal involving the company. This scandal, also known as the ‘ENRON Scandal’ gained a vast amount of media coverage on both domestic and international levels; in addition, the ENRON scandal resulted in the bankruptcy of the company, the criminal prosecution of a number of executives, and an loss of upwards of $2 billion with regard to investors, employees, and clients.…